Jump to content

Yellow Feet

Gold Members
  • Content Count

    2,117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

404 Excellent

About Yellow Feet

  • Rank
    First Division Sub

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • My Team
    Berwick Rangers

Recent Profile Visitors

5,169 profile views
  1. Craig Hume first to confirm he’s been released.
  2. I cannot understand for the life of me why anyone supports JB. I know i’m criticised for talking about myself but I can only relate to my experiences. JB will do what JB wants and not listen to anyone else, regardless of whether or not they know better. I practically begged him to reconsider £12 admission prices before he made it public, he ignored me and then it got widely slated. Shock. I know my suggestion to investigate was ignored as i’ve since been asked to supply any information I had collected on LL prices. The arrogance to do f**k all research before making a decision like that is mind-blowing and emphasises how little thought goes into anything else he does. You’ve said yourself Stuart you’d only pay it for a season, and i’ve seen many other loyal fans say they’d not even pay it for one. If this is any indication of the rest of his plan, we are well and truly fucked.
  3. Bingo. Cut down the post to highlight the key parts but this is spot on. I was fighting with the board, and the board before that, to try and get anything done. Not the way to progress, as most people will eventually ask themselves what the point is. I’m not the most liked and I suppose one of the reasons is my stubbornness to do what I feel is best for the club, even is others (John) disagreed. An example: John Bell kept overlapping posts on Facebook and fucking up the content. I said I was happy to share whatever he wanted shared, but asked politely that he emailed it to me so it could go out at the right time. He ignored me and kept doing it. Next I asked Len, as Chairman, to speak to him. Either that conversation never happened or John chose to ignore him and kept doing it. I asked him a third time, being careful to explain that I was trying to keep a consistent tone of voice and style. He ignored me again and kept posting. So what did I do? Deleted him from all social media to stop him. He threw a hissy fit, demanded to get put back on “because i’m the vice chairman” and then tried to get me sacked. It wasn’t the best way to go about it, but as Dale said I had to force the change as I was being ingored whilst trying to do what was right. That complete lack of willingness to accept the youngsters is a large part of the downfall of the club.
  4. At least my ego would’ve slashed admission prices and hyped up the importance of the game on Saturday to try and do everything humanly possible to support the players, despite the fact we’re all but fucked. but hey, at least we know not to try and buy three programmes.
  5. So, we're without a goal in 629 minutes and it looks like we'll be facing a Cove side that conceded 12 goals in 30 league games. To put that in perspective, we've conceded 17 in the last four. RIP in peace BRFC
  6. I don't think he had a bad attidude. I was told, from within the club, that he was sent back because Johnny thought he had a bad attitude.
  7. Fair enough if that is true, data is harder to find at that level. Doesn't change my opinion on the situation though, should never unretire a coach over a fit and able player imo.
  8. Wasn't particularly helpful alongside my attempt to be serious in here really was it.
  9. Yes. Hello. It's quite clear from going through all these posts that you don't like me, but i'll try my best to answer your questions anyway. I spent two hours before a board meeting, on the day this was first announced, researching any possible loophole we could explore to get the Albion points reversed. I presented all of these (Peterhead, Hearts, Dundee Utd to name a few) at the board meeting and said that as we expect the players to give 100% on the pitch, we should be giving 100% off the pitch. I asked that we at least put out a statement, as soon as possible, acknowledging that the club were aware of the situation and would be doing all they could do question it. I said that fans weren't happy with it and that we needed to be seen to be trying our hardest. I was shut down as "Edinburgh and Peterhead aren't questioning it" (A terrible point given they were ADVANTAGED by it) and because it was "Nothing to do with us". Furthermore, Mr Harvey said he "didn't want us to look desperate" and was probably offended by my reply that we kind of were desperate. Now i'm fully aware you were a director and will have contacts that may be telling you different things but my words on the subject were based on what i'd seen that day in that board meeting. You have since said that they wanted nothing to do with it - proving I was in fact correct. I couldn't make the talk in but from what i've heard and seen both before it and after, this is way off the mark. Take the admission prices debate as an example. Looking at it from a general business perspective, not just football, how can anyone expect to charge the same price for a significantly poorer product and simultaneously increase customers? That's madness, as i have said. More to come on this. This is a huge blow for the club, and to pre-answer a point coming up, the club taking NINE DAYS to announce this was part of my reasoning to suggest the social side is in the dark ages. Of course it's obvious that was done to try and make it look like they left and the end of the season and not with 3 games to go, as then people would want an explanation as to why they walked out. I don't know, but having worked with the man myself i'll guess it was JOHNNY HARVEY. I know your opinions on my blog where I mentioned this but I was trying to highlight this is a wider issue than just me. Yourself, Dale, Kieran, Martin and others all did a lot of good work on that side of the club. I don't know the full details of the deal Dale worked to secure with Newcastle Airport but with it running out this summer I can't see it being replaced. The reality is, it should be getting built and improved upon. There was a real lack of willingness to listen, especially from John. This has now left the club in a position where no one internally has any idea about how to do these things. This is something that annoys me. He knew what he was walking into so he can't use it as an excuse. The number of transfers shows that the board have backed him and he has made several wrong decisions. He has also made the claim that the players he wanted were not available. Why waste the money the board have offered then? It's already been well covered on here but the best performances i've seen this season were our 4-2 win at Elgin and our Scottish Cup game v East Fife. Both of those, particularly Fife in the cup, were games with Robbie's squad. There was enough there to see us over until next season where he could've used that money more effectively imo. Again, everyone has already offered their opinion on this, but for me in theory it wasn't a bad idea. To do it straight after a 6-0 pumping and then publicly announce it however was a bad idea. Just highlighting this, one of a few similar posts from different users in this thread, as I have been criticised for saying it. Another point I have been criticised for saying. Spot on - Paul Willis point blank refused to play for him again. Yet another example of him being hard to work with. I'm actually going to defend half of this statement - Harvey sent Dabrowski back to Hibs as he felt it would be better to have two fully signed 'keepers at the club. You can't argue with that and he brought in a 'keeper he trusted. Dispite being a bit of a loud-mouthed dick (i'll point out the hypocrisy to save you all the hassle) I thought Allison was a good player. He had a presence at the back and was vocal - something we had lacked. Nothing could be done about him dislocating his knee and by that point I imagine loan options were extremely limited. The second part though is spot on and a complete joke. The sub goalie is there as nothing more than cover and to put the goalie coach (who from a google search doesn't appear to have played since 14/15) ahead of the reserve 'keeper is a joke. I'd have walked if I had been overlooked like that, and I find it very disrespectful to the coaching staff at the reserves too as it shafted them. Seems to have been well known before we appointed him. A point i've already touched on but going back into it with more detail. John told me of his plans to maintain £12 admission if we end up in the Lowland. I questioned this as the strapline of the Lowland League is "affordable football" and admission is no more than £7 or maybe £8 elsewhere. I argued that a loss of away fans and more casual supporters would have a heavier financial dent than reducing prices, and admission decline can be seen by Shire's example. I then suggested, off the top of my head, that we could do some form of loyalty season ticket for supporters who understood why we looked at keeping it at £12 to continue offering the same level of financial support. This way the general admission would be best suited to keep attendances as high as possible but we'd also have the potential to gain that little extra from the core, loyal fanbase. I'm sure I read Redcar say he'd be willing to pay £12 for a season - so that's the kind of point I was making. For this to have all been ignored and then see the original plans widely criticised is massively frustrating. the club hasn't shared the admission prices online yet for fear of a backlash - kind of proving that they know it's wrong. I've seen a lot of comments about my bitterness. Think what you want but any ill-feelings I have are from frustration at being denied the chance to help and improve the club in areas that I can. All anyone can do is their best and if people are willing to help they should be encouraged to. I had to fight, and I mean really fight, to introduce a lot of things that have been widely applauded (Robbie Horn even had to step in on occasion to tell JB to go with my ideas). I feel I could have done more to help this situation if i'd been trusted, but everyone who knows the club knows John Bell doesn't like me and now he's in charge he was looking for any old excuse to get rid. The first one was to help make sure the picture was going to be framed correctly - we were using chairs for the first time to ensure the photos were more consistent and of a higher standard. The second one was for a laugh due to the reaction to the first one. Second point - I wanted that range to be used as our primary training range and was told I couldn't as it was going to be introduced as a retro range. That was in February 2017 and you were sat beside me in the meeting. I had originally planned to have Eric model it, a player who wore the original kit it was replicating, but Football Nation fucked up as per usual. I then planned to have a current player model it, but FN still hadn't delivered the sample. Despite have 9 months to produce a sample, FN delivered it two hours before it went on sale. I had no choice but to model it or we'd have been releasing a product range with no images. Hope this helps x Blimey, this is a big one. Here goes, hope this helps: 1. I was simply trying to highlight the fact that their arrival has made it harder for us to recruit from the Edinburgh area. I used Blair Henderson as an example as we would have had a better chance of getting him back if it wasn't for Edinburgh being in the same league. Robbie said at his talk-in that there was several players chose them over us. It is something that has affected us. I wasn't claiming Edinburgh were more ambitious than us, although clearly by the reaction it's obvious they are. 2. Has Craig heard of companies house? Decrease of amount in Cash at Bank and in hand over the last 3 years - 60%. Combined loss from May 2015 to May 2018 - £221,159. If all is well, why is the finances card played at every opportunity? 3. I've made my opinion based on what i've seen in the boardroom over the last 18 months or so that I was in there, combined with how i've watched the club fall. We are all entitled to our own opinions and that's mine. 4. I don't know who was or wasn't interviewed, so I can't pass comment on them. You clearly do, so feel free to enlighten us all? What i'm saying (and I couldn't say publicaly at the time as part of the club) is that Johnny's CV is the exact same as Robbie's and he had just failed. Take the team names off and they read almost identical. It would have been nice to see a more experienced head come in (Arbroath with Campbell, Clyde with Lennon, Cowden with Bollan) but of course your opinion on my words is guided by inside knowledge. 5. There are some players worth taking a risk on for a bad attitude in my opinion. Cedwyn had a brilliant goalscoring record and that carried over to us. Murrell is an example of a player with a terrible attitude that seemed to have given up and I wasn't sad to see him go. 6. I'm glad we agree it was a poor signing. I didn't mention where he came from as it's irrelevant. As others have pointed out, he's never scored a goal. He could've came from Real Madrid and it would've still been a blindingly obvious mistake. 7. We've not scored since I said that. over 5.5 games without a goal. Stats don't lie. 8. A bit of Arrogance would've been fine if accompanied by any decent results. It hasn't been though which makes it a lot worse. I haven't mentioned it for fear of further bitterness accusations, but that interview should never have gone live. After Coff's famous interview, I sat in on every single one to ensure nothing like that was shared again, as no one else seemed to have a functioning filter. Worth noting here that Johnny made us all stand in Dennis' office for about half an hour every week, something Coff and Robbie never did. Yesterday's was equally bad. The number of views over the last few weeks shows just how big a laughing stock they have become and the plug needs pulled. John Bell is in charge and has been since at least the start of the year. I think it's terrible and a sign of the weakness at board level that after refusing to comment on the situation at the time we do so after the decision and the appeal has all been done and dusted. Rangers get a lot of stick in Scottish football but at least they know how to make decent statements - we should've taken a similar attitude. Just highlighting this since you mauled me for saying it a month ago. I think a lot of people would've been up for this if they hadn't already been forced out. This whole post is spot on but i'm going to add comment on this one paragraph. I was told yesterday by a director that match updates weren't posted as they would only fuel the keyboard warriors. This emphasises my dinosaur and dark ages comments. It is appalling that frustrations of fans, many of whom have been season ticket holders since before I was born, are being viewed simply as keyboard warriors. Now I know full well that comments can be taken too far on social media (after all, i've been the one on the receiving end of them via the club accounts for the last few years) but social media is also a valuable tool in monitoring and understanding the feeling of your supporters. For the club to turn a blind eye to that is a massive mistake. There's confirmation of the answer to the "who is in charge" questions. At least we can agree on one thing. Apologies for talking about myself again, I know you all don't like it, but I have been saying for years (directly to the board) that we need to be fully analysing our audiences, both online and offline, and specifically targeting the companies who are chasing similar audiences and asking them how we can work together. Graham Bell previously advertised the shirt sponsorship to companies as "be seen on our shirts from Elgin in the North to Annan in the South". What use is that to anyone? John Bell has now been sat firing from the hip sending emails to everyone and anyone asking for money. It doesn't take a lot of work to do this in my opinion and yet it would have a great impact on securing commercial deals, particularly smaller ones. This is an area where commercially the club could benefit from our digital presence and I really hope they realise this and bring someone in to do that. This again was to avoid the loyal supporters having an opinion on winning one game in 23. Sorry I mean this was to avoid feeding trolls and keyboard warriors. John Bell, as i've highlighted above. I also think a massive, massive issue though is the willingness of directors to openly discuss everything and anything to do with the club in public. Anything that has to come from the boardroom should be coming through the club's official channels in a timely and precise manner. Johnny, since you're probably reading this, your new chairman is your leak and has been for several years. Spot on again. This is where my dislike of the man comes from. I thought I could change it and was booted out. We're fucked. I know we've shaken hands on this and moved on, but the very fact you went to him on the issue - going over my head instead of simply apologising - highlights the fact you are clearly good friends. I'm fully aware i'm not a popular man right now but all i've done is say it as it is from what i've seen over the last few years. I'm massively frustrated, as we all are, and it's heartbreaking to now be helpless as we're plunged further than we've ever been into this shambles. I've decided to come back on here to try and offer a bit more on why i've said what I said as it has been questioned a lot. It's still my opinion that we need to roll the dice for the playoffs, but all optimism I had has been gone a while and simply being told to "#backtheblackandgold" isn't enough. Actions speak louder than words.
  10. The way I view this is £10 x 250 covers a balance between £12 adult tickets and £7 concession tickets. When you look around at Shielfield you’d estimate at least 30-40% are concessions so it’s probably fair: 4 x £7 = £28 & 6 x £12 = £72 so £100 10 x £10 = £100
  11. I’m switching to in general here, but imagine that with the big team are away to Ross County and the Colts are away to Clyde. I think there could be a “f**k it lets just all go” situation happen and it could be a riot. In the case of Rangers the fans know how fun the smaller away days can be.
  12. I’ve tried to summarise the financial pros/cons of these Colt teams to Berwick as an example of what we’re looking at, please bear with my post if it waffles a bit. The average attendance of Irn Bru Cup round one games was 232. If you work out a rough income per head from Berwick’s statement and attendance figures, gate receipts before the Colt Boost would be roughly £4300. Add the colt boost of £15,000 and assume all sponsor packages and hospitality sells out (prices from Berwick site) that’s another rough £9300. Total income £28600. Here we’ll add £2000 saving of travel costs (I assume £500 a bus for four games). Total benefit to club £30600. At present, using the same maths, four league games would bring in £12200. If you add two more home games, say if Cove and Spartans were promoted, the figure is £18300. So on the face of it the benefit of a 12 team league including colts not HL/LL team is £12300. Now all that money is subject to VAT. Now it’s £10250. Now there are additional costs/losses associated purely with the six games v colt teams. I’ve estimated here but if you say £1500 for extra policing/stewards (probably be more), loss of sales of other stuff (in the event colts fans don’t fill tickets) of say £250, you piss of half a dozen season ticket holders that’s £700 odd, you lose half a dozen fans from every other away game who are also pissed off… goodbye another £1300. Whilst you’re at it a couple of season ticket holders were also sponsors in one way or another, common at this level, that’s another £500. Costs/losses associated with colts = £4250 So you’re looking at a total profit of £6000 for having those colts. But hang on, what if the Colt system means you lose out on cheap loan players and need an extra £150 a week over a 40 week season for wages? Ladies and Gentlemen we arrive at £0.
  13. I've all but given up on this website but i've a few points i'd like to make on this so i'm attempting a sensible post. Firstly, we used to have our own team in EOS and the best it produced was Josh Morris. What you're suggesting is pretty much turning Tweedmouth into BRFC 20s. The whole point of loan deals is to get the boys mixed in with adults and learn from it. If they're all in the same team that's not going to work so well so one or two max at each club is probably much better. By that logic we'd be as well not sending anyone to Tweedmouth and playing friendlies on Saturdays. That leads me on to point two. We're not a charity. The whole point is to develop the players and get them (hopefully) ready for SPFL football. The 20s don't exist to prop up our neighbours. Which leads on nicely to point three. Local football is absolutely fucked. I've nothing against any clubs but they're having a real struggle to attract players etc. I watched Tweedmouth v Eyemouth fairly recently and Eyemouth won 5-0. The same Eyemouth were boasting on Twitter about having 12 players at training. Why should we be sending all of our prospects to play in teams full of folk who can't be arsed? they're going to achieve nothing. I assume you'll have watched plenty this season so you'll know fine well. With Kelty pumping everyone in sight and Dalkeith applying to join the party sadly I don't see the likes of Eyemouth and Tweedmouth lasting long. Now i'll admit at this stage I don't know a huge amount about football at this level but it appears to me that most of the 20s have been loaned out to teams at a better level (or certainly a better team) than Tweedmouth. This kind of links to point two here but surely they should be sent to the best possible level. The age old saying train with people better than you etc etc etc. I'll finish with location as my final point. Tweedmouth play at Shielfield, same as the first team. We struggle to attract players to the first team due to being so far away and that is with wages. I can't think of any reason why players from Edinburgh and the central belt would come to the 20s if we then told them they'd be travelling that far week in week out. Especially to get pumped every week. I've absolutely no problem with sending a couple to Tweedmouth. As i've just said with location they're probably ideal for the local youngsters but hopefully you realise that what you are suggesting really isn't a win win situation at all. Edited to add: I wouldn't want them to go to Tweedmouth purely to guarentee game time either. Yes they need to play but it's important to have them fighting for places too. The competitive aspect is needed.
×
×
  • Create New...