Bestsinceslicebread

Don't fix it, have the balls to tell the truth if your for or again putting a Talbots fan face on the supporter website for buying mercn, pies or using Darvels facilities or not?

Just been reading about the boycott But the part I've put in bold, is this true?, honestly that is just a new low. I hear the comments of criticism, jealousy and hatred for past few years and the guy Gall hasn't helped himself at times and don't blame the criticism they get but for Talbot to share some Talbot supporters face on the Talbot supporters website for buying, (a pie), ffs that is low, sickening and is actually dangerous and there's even talbot supporters on here supporting this. The only gain you get from this is the possibility of some backwater fan taking action against the person photographed, guys not good, its a football game ffs ffs some poor talbot fan will be crapping himself to use the toilet if he's busting for a No 1, never mind a No 2

St Cadocs, do not have and where near 800 kids in their academy If they are paying £50 a month, the math is, this money goes towards two home games a month, think the park costs, £140/£150 per game so expected to be £280/£300 and paying 2 training sessions a week, unsure what is left over but to be fair, its not too much. Also, not every kid is paying £50 a month. Theres also paying for traning kit, training materials and tools, match and training balls and the football strips. If they have a small sponser that helps then brill but not much money left, and that money would not go towards the first team Is it true that St Cadocs met the league requirements and were voted in by all the members clubs? I'm unsure of that, sure someone cant let us all know. it looks like St Cadocs have a major sponsor, so if the team run their finances well then god luck to them and have a backdrop incase the money leaves when the sponsor finishes with the team. (You could question any club that is reliant on just one major sponsor, it has happened for years at various clubs often with same outcome, financial ruin for many years after the funder pulls out. ) Well Hurlford United did exactly this and they came out well and have been an established premier team for many years, even after the money man/men left

to be honest, your the one, people usually rip the pish out of. you keep coming out with this name and that isnt me, but dumb shits can't be changed over night

yip agreed, lol, supposed I've gave more information to prove he was right in what he said lool, my bad

lololol, Honestly the crap people talk on here. No he wasn't. Gormley was sacked with about 16 games to go or something like that to stay up, sure it was the Cumnock 5.2 defeat was the final straw and think it was January he was gone. The new guy had plenty of time as Kilwinning had games in hand when he took over, but the new manager brought back players who were out on loan who were not deemed good enough but Gormley and the coaching staff for that level and so it proved as fans were moaning about the players not good enough either. Don't think Gormley can hold his head high with Kilwinning but he should have been allowed to stay longer and try and get out fo the slump. It was the committee, and new chairman, who got rid of him to early and chose the guy who did put Kilwinning Down

I suppose this was always going to happen, when the east moved over, there was a cpl of years of teams moving over and even the West Lothian section moving over later when the new EOSFL was looking settled, the thing now is that there is no ceiling and there's a clear objective if desired now for teams, although slow, if a team is good enough they can reach a higher level and if they are not good enough they will go to a lower level but some teams maybe at a lower level due to being, well lets just say, 'run not too well for past couple of years, committee wise etc..' but you do expect teams to come back, thus reaching what we expect to be their level. it definitely was better that the whole west moved over together and if i remember correctly there was a lot of teams complaining about the structure regarding pervious teams standings/positions and where they should be in the new structure but now both WOSFL and EOSFL are nearly all but stable. (Would need to check but below the Highland league, they didn't have that much of a problem as I'm sure everyone moved over at the same time to form 3 associations under tier 5) Even in the premier divisions both in the East and latterly the West, in its new formation when joining the pyramid, would have taken a while to become stable and you can see this, especially in the East as well known clubs eventually leaving the East to move up to the LL and teams now moving down to the East. I personally think the West is stronger than the East having bene to many games on both sides but facts are for past few seasons East teams have won promotion to the LL and West have not, no matter what I or anyone else thinks, in a few years time when people look back to now and past few years they will see that the East was stronger as always promoted, no matter what any excuse we use from the West side. I do think that once we have one WOSFL team win promotion then we will see more doing the same to gain promotion but the East still have a few strong teams the now with everything going well on all fronts, team, structure, committee etc... are, my view, Broxburn Athletic and Jeanfield Swifts.

because as like the deliverance, your dumb as feck and there was a few of you saying that omg, he replied just like a muppet

No I typed it as defiantly, you blind ya muppet whose ripping the pish out of who Well you are known for railroading posts,

There you go with that name again, another ffs wur you not one of the idiots who said i was Mick kennedy? it all stopped once he started his own profile, you defiantly accused me of being someone else about a year ago. But then you and the moppet who thinks of me a lot, are we cliques, feels like a little bit of deliverance, you support the same team or from the same area?

And the muppt put a picture us like he usually does lolol go on, think of me tomorrow

No lol rant from me oh and I'm one of a kind. I've not been posting for a while but its good to know that I'm on your mind, I don't know how many times I've made you look like a muppet on here and this time i didn't even post and you still think of me, that's so nice

To be fair, even if Clydebank win the league or another licensed club, I don't think they will win the playoff as I've watched Broxburn Athletic who are way out in front of the EOSFL and think they will win the payoff. So correct me if I'm wrong, this would mean only 3 are promoted if a WOSFL team don't win the playoff? I believe the only way a 4th can be promoted from the first division is that the WOSFL champions are licensed and they win the playoff, (thus leaving the WOSFL to join the Lowland) and no WOSFL location team is relegated from the Lowland league. Sure someone can confirm this is correct or not?

Bellshill 1 Arthurlie 2

This should be a cracker of a match Anyone know the odds for this match result?

Suppose it is what it is and we are hear now. We are headed in the right direction, it is very slow and not the way most would have wanted but look back 5, 6, 10 years ago, never thought back then we would be at the stage we are now which is great but knowing what we all know, it should have progressed a lot earlier

Whatever anyone says JG has been good for Darvel ! on the condition that the club are not in debt and the facilities they have are all theirs and that they have money in the bank to fulfil the players and staffs contracts, if so then Id say well done.. Anyone who comes in with money for any club will eventually finish with the club, money wise but clubs with money men aren't always successful, they need the right management, committee, staff etc.. to all come together and push the club on. Has Darvel been successful? Majority on here will say defiantly not, I however will say yeah, they are considered a premier league team now, (for how long though, haven't clue) and they have given, what i term is the biggest shock in Scottish Football with the Scottish cup win over Aberdeen. I still remember Darvel as being one of those Ayrshire teams that you'd expect to get an easy 3 points from but changed days, will they go back to that level, don't know but I can't see them going any higher from where they are now so eventually as the fan base isn't that big, they could teeter in the future with relegation but they have sponsorship in place for the next 5 season so they have to be in a good place

The disrespect is from where, individuals on this forum, your gonna get that but not from clubs, all clubs just want a fair crack and level playing field regarding relegation and promotion . I am west orientated and think of the West but decisions that are made that affect the West, positive or negative quite rightly apply to the East as they are at the same tier, the same goes for the SOSFL, (yes i do not think this association should be at tier 6 due to the low standard of football but they are here and entitled to be at tier 6 as that was their entry level as an association) (Personally - Way off in the future if it will ever happen but I would also like to see it changed amicably by whatever method but as long as it works out just East and West at tier 6, will make everything a whole lot easier, East champions play West champions or Both East and West champions promoted with two down from the LL). There is no entitlement of teams of leagues should be higher than what they are or lower what they are, every team is equal as an entity and no matter what division they are in. The problem we have with certain higher divisions make decisions that affect lower down teams who cannot do anything about it. i.e Spfl2 teams and above can make decisions on relegation that effect LL and the LL cant do that much about it. LL make decisions about relegation and the leagues below WOSFL, EOSFL and SOSFL cannot do much about it. I say my peace on here why, because I actually go and been to games in the WOSFL, SOSFL, EOSFL, LL, HL, NL and ML or watched teams from those leagues play after covid, most areas listed before covid. I will say, lots of supporters , especially in the Highland and Lowland have that attitude, (and this is from chatting with a lot), about the upstarts from below and I think to myself, WTF have they been reading or who they been listening too. I think there should be a fair promotion and relegation throughout ALL divisions in our Scottish Pyramid to make it one of the most competitive Pyramid systems out there but it is not fair and anyone who is objective I would expect the same answer anyone else who says differently has alternative or ulterior views. One final thing, In regards to this thread and what the OP is saying, I would say is totally wrong and go as far as saying a silly view, if totally meant. ffs we could get a teams from the Lowland league offering kick backs to clubs to resign to help their own club or clubs lower down offering kickback to higher league clubs so they can benefit. The way its structured just now will suffice to see who goes down, if any goes down so play out the season as normal

Agreed with your assessment here Yes I think its ridiculous what the Op is asking or stating. Your comment that I have put in bold is that its been a few years for these two in the relegation end but it should be by the normal conventional way of relegation that they are demoted. We are in a situation in this competitive league which is wrong, (no automatic relegation), the bottom team, actually the bottom two should be relegated, you finish last your moved out but both could be saved this season. Think everyone is agreed that the bottom performing teams which everyone expected again is Edinburgh Uni and Gretna and I cant see any changes until they are both relegated over a few seasons One thing is we have to remember, everything could change for a team who are in despair, any team, a major sponsor, a new chairman, committee, a new manager, players etc.. Just let it run its course and see who is relegated over the next few years as most that I expect to be relegated over the next 5 years from the Lowland league I don't expect them to be back anytime soon

I'm totally lost, its defiantly not theirs to throw away, in facts its other teams league to throw away, so haven't got a clue what you are on about If St Cadocs win their games in hand which they are capable of then they go one point ahead of Clydebank and if Beith win their games n hand which they are capable of then they go a cpl of points ahead of St Cadocs, so to me the league is wide open

Vale of Leven 5 West Park 1

Errm sorry, but you continually said my facts were wrong and you have even elaborated, the two little dittos, it was George Frazer instead of Tom brown who made final deciding vote but that is nothing to do with the corruption of Tom Brown going on the official catch up podcast and saying that no matter what Highland league and Lowland league vote, the conference league is coming. He is either delusional or he has been told to do so for benefits but he is the chairman of the Lowland league and still is and should not be in charge of the Lowland league, makes it look so corrupt and putting down Neil as the SFA instead of the SPFL a type mistake but both governing bodies joined together to push it through. These people should not be in power as they are not interested in the benefit of all of Scottish football but guys like you are just brushing it under the carpet and making comments personable and I believe i haven't made it personal, I've tired not too and if i have I'm sorry but I am right. I was actually listening to the recorded audio of gm of the WOSFL, 23rd of April, (sure that's the date, will confirm later) when Maxwell made his speech and its mental, how he is in power you just couldn't write it. There are assholes on here, some at clubs, some even in positions and think they know it all, its a forum, people put points across, views etc.. and I didn't start it, was someone else when i read back who was wrong and I emphasized and that's how this section discussion went and low and behold, i was right all along about the points and you as well as the others who have personally attacked haven't admitted that the facts I presented were right and at the end of the day, Guys like Neil Doncaster, Ian Maxwell and Tom Brown who have made, at the very least, dishonest decisions and of cohersion to say the least, are still in their positions of trust ffs

What are you talking about? who am I slagging off, go on, let us all know, this will be good

Who says I'm part of a club, ffs Just bring things that are dishonest or corruption, (whatever way you think it is) to the front as they have been ignored and shouldn't be ignored as it will happen again with the same people in power