rhliston
-
Posts
2,012 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by rhliston
-
-
1 hour ago, WC Boggs said:
Nope. you just aren't worth it.
VICTORY
0 -
2 minutes ago, WC Boggs said:
The only point you made to Binogals is what a patronizing clown you are.
Your resolution was binned from the AGM agenda, because it was not appropriate to go ahead with it during a mediation process
The comment I just made regarding your resolution, was that the part requesting the removal of John Daly was valid given the circumstances. You even have an issue with that, which is insanity beyond belief.
I won't question anybody's intelligence over how they choose to vote. People have a right to differing opinions without their intelligence being called into question. I'll leave that sort of patronising shit to you. Keep going. You're doing a fantastic job of attacking yourself.
Ah your back again it did not take you long to respond.
Regarding your rant, I`ve not going to respond and keep repeating the same things over and over again to you as its waste of time Club Board Stooge. No doubt you will come back to me with another rant.
0 -
3 minutes ago, BinoBalls said:
You keep saying that. It’s just people who have a different opinion to you. It doesn’t mean they are being controlled by someone else behind the scenes.
Remember several people accused you of being a puppet for the Trust board? That was clearly nonsense and you told people that you were your own man with your own opinions. You’re now doing exactly the same thing back to them.
Only difference is their appears to be Truth to what I am saying.
0 -
1 minute ago, BinosGal said:
You are the only stooge I'm afraid. I do my own talking and thinking. The members don't need you reminding them. As you have said - ALOT - they can make up their own minds. The fact you have now gone to check how many times I've posted on here is ridiculous. With regards to being under the control of the CB, feel free to contact the club and take your accusations directly to them.
Also feel free to confirm whether or not you support bullying and aggressive behaviour? A question you have failed to answer everytime it's posed to you.
Your Back
well that was quick retirement. Me a Stooge NO way. I am an independent person with a mind of my own. Unlike you who suddenly appear and the majority of the 6 posts you have posted on here are about me. Its very simple to see how many posts you have posted just look under your name it tells you.
Didn`t you notice that. ?
With regard to your question I have made it very clear what my response is its a Witch Hunt brought about by members of the gang of 74.
0 -
3 minutes ago, BinoBalls said:
I wish you’d quit as well. You’ve talked this whole thing to death and it’s the same stuff over and over. Ironically all it does is turn people like me (who are relatively neutral) against your point of view.
I do apologise for repeating the same things over and over again but when you have Club Board stooges on here that don`t UNDERSTAND what I am saying or trying to get across then its very hard not to repeat it.
0 -
8 minutes ago, BinosGal said:
How condescending of you. I got up fresh as a daisy thank you. I've been on here for a while, just chose not to comment until now. How do you think the volunteer feels having her name put on here by you and practically dragged through the mud. No one is attacking you. You give it out but spit the dummy out when it's handed back to you. I'll say no more because quite frankly you are not worth anymore of my time.
Really you have been on here a while but chose not to comment.
Do you think that I am a fool ? Admit it your a Club Board stooge on here to attack me, following the orders of your master, go on admit it, it does you no favours by denying it.
Regarding the volunteer, you are having a laugh are you not by suggesting that I am dragging her practically through the mud. The fact is and I forget how many times I have said this that the members of the Trust have the right to make an informed choice of who they wish to see elected onto the Trust Board. I am only giving them the facts into this volunteer`s background and where she is coming from. If members chose to ignore my comments and vote for her, fine. Its called Democracy , at the end of the day as I have repeated many times on here and on Facebook the members will make the choice, not me or anyone else for that matter.
Your not going to say anymore on the matter
, well that`s a surprise after only 5 posts on here you decide to quit.
0 -
1 hour ago, WC Boggs said:
You did not explain it, I did. What you did, was call a resolution to remove that member based on a pattern of aggressive behaviour, a witch hunt. Utter hypocrisy from the man who launched a resolution to remove John Daly for the lesser sin of inappropriate comment. Both resolutions were valid given the circumstances. Both men set themselves up for removal. Innocence or guilt is not based on factional loyalties. It is based on the provable actions of the individuals concerned.
John Daly was right to bite the bullet and resign. The membership secretary should spare the Trust board further embarrassment and follow suit.
See my post to BinoGals that expresses it very clearly. Clearly you are a stooge put up by the Club Board to attack me.
Do you think any intelligent person reading your posts of which they have been many on here would not come to the same conclusion. ?
You go on about my resolution from a previous AGM which was cancelled by the Trust Board after well how can I put it simply Dodgy voting by the gang of 74 which includes you as a signatory to the resolution to remove the ENTIRE Trust Board without giving a reason.No doubt you will come back to me with another one of your rants on here.
0 -
14 minutes ago, BinosGal said:
I don't recall you explaining it at all. I do recall you picking fault with everything and anything that goes against your resolutions(s) or that show any kind of support to the current CB. Having read the resolution regarding the removal of the current TB member I see no issue in why the volunteer would second it. Why would she want to work alongside them or be associated with that kind of behaviour. Your refusal to indicate any wrong doing by the individual in question would indicate to some that you see no issue with it? That in itself speaks volumes.
My my we do seem to have come out of the wrong side of bed this morning
As I said in my post in my opinion it’s nothing more than a Witch Hunt. That’s my opinion of the situation. At the end of the day it’s up to the members of the Trust to say Yes or No to this resolution.
In regard to the 2 candidates that I mentioned in my statement, again as I have explained many times, I was merely giving members some background information as to the candidates suitability to be elected into the Trust Board.
Again it’s up to the members to decide whether to vote Yes or Not on whether they get elected to the Trust Board or not.
Finally I will say and it’s clear to any intelligent person reading your post and by others on here that I am being attacked by supporters of the Club Board for standing up and speaking out against what I see is going on here.
The mere fact that you have just joined P&B clearly indicates that’s your purpose is it not. ?
as
0 -
1 hour ago, BinosGal said:
Do you want to share the reason why there is a motion in place to remove a trust board member? Or are you happy to continue to make out that she is seconded it just to be awkward? I'm pretty sure that it would add some clarity and make your argument pointless.
Welcome to Pie and Bovril BinosGal.
why don’t you explain the resolution to remove the Trust Board member I have already done so and can’t be arsed telling it again.
0 -
1 hour ago, dave_binos said:
It's all getting a bit boring and pathetic. I'm not totally against one of the two rhilston mentioned going onto the Trust board and there is absolutely nothing wrong with a volunteer who gets on well with the Club board putting themselves forward. If it makes a difference and helps the club moving forward I'm all for it. I actually encourage it if she can offer something. I do find it a bit bizarre why a club doctor would want on the Trust board though. He is a paid employee by the club (I'm assuming) but it is a bit weird why an employee would want to get involved behind the scenes - unless he grew up a Stirling Albion fan which I'm assuming he didn't. Completely bizarre move in trying to vote out the entire Trust board. I'd maybe understand 1 or 2 individuals but the whole lot of them? and replace with who? More fans who inevitably get nowhere and end up resigning? Sounds great.
I'm not on Facers but a bit pathetic if another Trust chairman has stepped down. There is clearly an issue at the top of the club which needs addressed. Otherwise we will continue to be a League 2 club/float towards the Lowland League.
It's a real shame adults continue to argue on Facers and on here. I enjoyed the Stenny game last Saturday but everything else going on is slowly making me lose that passion for Stirling Albion.
I was a Trust member but unfortunately not able to renew my membership or vote due to the actions of others.
You make some good points dave_binos regarding the doctor. Regarding the volunteer in question she has also seconded the resolution to remove a member of the Trust Board. Clearly if that happens and she is elected to the Board, its going to be interesting to say the least how the other Trust Board members react.
0 -
8 minutes ago, TheWestStand said:
Oh i'm ready for this
who's 'their master'?
Dearie me you don`t know, have a think about it.
0 -
3 hours ago, WC Boggs said:
At least he knows better than to tell everybody that he gets his jollies from irritating his own club's supporters online. What a self demeaning admission to make.
The people I was referring to are the clowns like you or as I call them the Usual suspects who start posting on the orders of their Master.
0 -
7 minutes ago, BB_Bino said:
My vote has been cast, I look forward to hearing the results.
So has mine may the best candidates man or woman win.
0 -
11 hours ago, Silverton End said:
Can you swap "mediation" for "medication" in your well constructed post please.
Thank You
I`m in full agreement with you on that, did express in a post on Page 36 of this thread my concerns about this man after attending a Trust Meeting which he was at.
0 -
42 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said:
Now Now we don`t want any more dodgy voting Please.
0 -
1 hour ago, WC Boggs said:
Well I know a lot more about what is going on than Flybhoy it seems.
0 -
Message to all Trust Members just received the e mail from the Trust outlining details for voting.
Anyone who cannot make the AGM can vote online, just follow the instructions.
Its your chance to have your say, make sure you use it.
0 -
43 minutes ago, WC Boggs said:
Flybhoy is clearly aware of your resolution to remove the chairman and amalgamate the boards, but not aware that resolution is now binned. You know damned well what resolution he is referring to, so cut the evasive crap.
Evasive crap Flybhoy needs to get up to speed if he is coming on here posting comments pretending to know what is going on.. Maybe it’s best to keep his trap shut until he knows the full facts of what is happening at the AGM.
0 -
35 minutes ago, Cosmic Joe said:
Have you considered taking this to Brussels?
No
0 -
2 minutes ago, Flybhoy said:
If me pointing out how vindictive, petty and embarrassing some of the skewed comments you are stating here, the twisting of facts to suit your agenda and your gripe with certain individuals being the motive behind a lot of what you are coming out with is me spouting nonsense so be it but, it's clear others on here and on the social media channels you are also pushing this stuff on are forming the same viewpoint, I think that speaks volumes
Your entitled to your opinion I mine and if they differ then so what.
0 -
6 minutes ago, BinoBalls said:
You’re presenting a very selective bunch of “facts” that happen to fit your preferred narrative. We all have an opinion here but you’re the only one canvassing on Pie and Bovril to try and get people to see things your way. Ironically all you’ve done is persuaded me to vote for the complete opposite of what you’re saying, because your whole attitude stinks.
A very selective bunch of "facts" is it, the fact is its the Truth is it not. As regards your vote I don`t think I would have had much chance of getting you to change your mind anyway.
0 -
2 minutes ago, WC Boggs said:
The fact is that the Trust board cited insufficient reason given in the view of council, not no reason at all. I suggest you check with them if you can't accept that.
You clearly do not understand do you, that insufficient reason the Counsel was referring too was NO reason was given for wanting to remove the ENTIRE TRUST BOARD in the resolution. That`s why it was rejected by the Trust Board. If a reason had been given then the Trust Board would have had to put it in front of the membership for consideration.
0 -
4 minutes ago, BinoBalls said:
A few weeks ago the key people on both sides came together and agreed to try and work together to move this whole situation forward. Nearly everyone felt relieved and hopeful progress could be made despite the obvious personal friction.
Posting stuff about who people who volunteer behind the scenes and saying why they mustn’t be allowed on the Trust, and saying how enjoyable it is to irritate people on Facebook, is the antithesis of the spirit of cooperation. We are all trying to get away from petty warfare. Well, everyone except you it seems.
Yes we are trying to get away from Petty warfare but the facts remain that members of the Trust deserve the right to know the facts and once given those facts can make a choice of whether to vote for or against a candidate. Thats all I am doing is letting members make up their own minds according to the facts. That`s Democracy
0 -
1 minute ago, WC Boggs said:
Actually no it isn't. To be fair to the Trust board, they did not say no reason was given. What they did say was that "insufficient" reason was given in the view of council.
Yes it is the facts NO reasons were give as to why they wanted to remove the Entire Trust Board. When I submitted my resolution to remove Stuart Brown as Chairman and Club Director, I gave members the reasons why I wanted to remove him is that not the case. ? Indeed if I had not then the Trust Board would have refused to accept my resolution is that not the fact. ?
0
A Message to All Stirling Albion Trust Members
in Scottish League 2 General Chatter
Posted
Lets hope you keep to your word now. Regarding the mediation lets hope it works and the changes to the Articles of Association proposed to be voted on by members are put in place. If they had been changed years ago then none of this might not have happened. Out of Chaos comes Order.