Jump to content

Killiepiyo

Gold Members
  • Posts

    3,459
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Killiepiyo

  1. Would imagine so pal, the case for me is the facts that everything was done using the correct and identified channels. Only reason for official checks is to avoid things like this happening imo. Mistakes can happen but ejecting the club for seemingly someone else’s mistake is rightly being challenged as I see it.
  2. Yes I can play? Wasn’t as if he was signing for a season and didn’t know what game he would be appearing in. He certainly looked surprised when EK were celebrating
  3. I think you can read? The player was asked, his club was asked and finally, the cup who all said he could play.
  4. Hopefully it’s pretty straightforward to show the paperwork. Anyone know if these cup committee meetings are minuted and if fans or clubs can look at them?
  5. Aye three page ranting letter to the club and programme about my poor elocution
  6. Cheers for saying, still some marbles in the mouth but will hopefully be more fluid more I do it.
  7. ..Anyway back to Talbot NOT BAD. Think Arthurlie poster is correct in their opinion
  8. Me grow up? How many accounts have u had since Hertha?. Your team are top of league, flying! Not since Millar have u had as much form but you’re on here with Jr being tribal eeyore’s TALBOT BADing it together. I get you’re a little obsessed with me, that’s fine takes all sorts but if ‘real fan’ Piyo metal break down stuff has not worked or had an impact in 8 years now it’s not likely to. Jeeso Mahn
  9. Think suggesting that would be my response is ridiculous, I do mess around on here but if you’re taking that from what I said that’s more reflective of you. Said earlier based on the statement it’s likely been a mistake by the cup and then by Talbot by not picking up on the mistake. I wonder that as three out of the four times for the SAME GAME the process worked as it presumably has every game/season prior. Rather than the likes of the cup saying it’s a mistake we’ve made, (suggested the double barrel surname not flagging as it’s likely an honest mistake like that) these things happen, instead no one is holding their hands up aside from Talbot who are paying the full price. TALBOT BAD! That draws more attention imo and can see it played out across social medias for what could have been resolved in 2 minutes. Do we end up with proof of communications in the press? Video conferences clips being investigated by the SFA/independent member? Someone other than Talbot owning up likely wont change the outcome but at least promote some trust for us fans and may help prevent it happening again in my own unhinged/crazy opinion.
  10. But not with the other three of the four checked? Away and stop pretending
  11. Does anyone honestly think that the player wasn’t asked? It wasn’t as if he down the park between jumpers and thrown into a Talbot jersey
  12. No, paperwork aside should always be a last resort over turning a result never mind removing someone from a cup.
  13. Some may hold the opinion it’s easier to boot someone out the cup
  14. So the point of having a club secretary checking with cup Secretary for eligibility is…
  15. They’ve literally a paper trail saying they didn’t
  16. Did the Buff’s get it in writing from the league he could play?
  17. Indeed fella, had it not been an emergency loan the media team may have had the chance to look at the player and perhaps could have spotted it as trolllad points out. However going by the statement, if you’ve seemingly documented checks you conduct for all signings, in this example 4! Which appears to have got at three of them correct it’s hard to justify then going on to cross examine them. It’s apparently the cup themselves, no a random on google. If it’s an honest mistake by someone due to the double barrel surname for example, then that should be said. Not boot a team out of a cup, The loss of earnings and drawing endless attention to the matter in what? An effort to protect a possible mistake? Hope Talbot appeal
  18. Statement says the process has been followed, it came back he could play from the competition Secretary, not sure who else you can officially check with? Seems like they managed to get the other three players right in the exact same process so makes you wonder…
  19. Can’t believe there is as little attention on this as there presently is. At worst a complete lock out at best yet another barrier in the way which we can seemingly do nothing about
  20. Yup processes are there for reasons, important details are looked at, doesn’t satisfy the TALBOT BAD crowd but sure a few folk interested to find out how it occurred and how it could be avoided in future likely.
×
×
  • Create New...