You have to continually make these snide remarks. What TF is wrong with you? I can see it from the daft wee 'blood and soil' Natters but you acting like an ignorant boor is, surely, beneath you. Maybe not. Bit pathetic anyway.
The entire point is, "This was, very clearly, a recognition that there was a constitutional justification for a referendum, albeit one that had to be agreed through a clear framework that included Westminster legislation."
The bit you got wrong was "constitution recognition". There was no such thing. It was entirely pragmatic. The bit you got right was, "Through...Westminster legislation". Why? Because we're a unitary nation state - which is where we started the discussion.
If you reply then stop being a child and try and play nicely - though I know you'll struggle with it.