pandarilla

That's a weak comparison though. These are entirely different contexts.

I'd take Armstrong over mcginn, and I'd definitely leave mctominay for a more defensive role (against the big teams). We've got so many good options in midfield positions, and hopefully that will be enough to get the job done tomorrow.

I genuinely don't think there was an alternative to this. Brexit as a concept is so fucking devisive. May is absolutely mental. Surely there can't ever have been a more stubborn leader? Corbyn has a very difficult fence to try and sit on. He can't come down on one side or the other (as his party and their voters are as divided as the Tories) - but he's fucking up the pr. It was always going to be this depressing.

It's not many of us, to be fair.

Armstrong has to play. I really don't understand why that's up for debate. He's been outstanding for Scotland in the last couple of years, and is playing and doing well for Southampton.

Arses are literally not other parts of the body though. They are the open crevices where your shite meets the outside world. I'm absolutely astounded (not to mention a little disappointed) by the lack of anal sex references on this thread.

Rik Astley?

Any word on when the queens rearranged game will be? It's very frustrating that we don't have a game for over 10 days. Understandable, but very frustrating.

That's an outstanding article.

Guinness marketing.

Yeah that's what I was thinking [emoji53]

I feel bad for him. Not for Millwall, but for him.

We never deserved to take the lead at Hampden though, that was jammy as f**k. Yesterday in the second half we tore those yuppy b*****ds a new arsehole, and they couldn't stop us.

Apologies. So is anyone (not just p&b, but wider reaction) actually happy with the outcome of this inquiry? It's a bit like May's Brexit deal. Those who campaigned for so long feel like this is a pitiful outcome, and then there's the supporters of the British army who are appalled that anyone will face trial. I personally feel that this is the worst outcome. Like I said earlier, I understand the argument about letting this whole thing lie because of the complicated context of the troubles. I don't know if I agree with it, but I certainly understand it. There's a huge amount of hatred on both sides, and lines have to be drawn somewhere. But my instinct is that anyone who put the paras in that day, and anyone who gave them orders should be up in court. Not just one individual soldier.

So is there proof that such an order was given?