-
Posts
1,296 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Mad Capsule
-
I might be being a bit thick here, but would there be any chance of the following happening after this evidence has been found - Sale to Green overturned, so assets (Ibrox etc) still belong to Whyte. Rangers still belong to Whyte, Sevco belongs to Green. Because Whyte owns Rangers and Ibrox, Sevco will no longer be allowed to play there and have no ground. But most importantly, that money grabbing p***k Sandaza is made redundant!
-
Ooooft! Really? Why don't these people wake up? All they are doing is ploughing cash in, which will be used to cover wages to push for promotion to the SPL. (We all know they want to be readmitted to get back into Europe.) I reckon another call for money will be asked for in a couple of years time in Division 1, but I reckon SevCo will still be kicking around then. I don't think Green will be off anytime soon, no matter how badly we all want it to happen.
-
Thanks for that. Reading that, it doesn't seem like he's in it for the buck, more like he wants to control a football club that will achieve greatness simply for his own ego. I'm not sure how many people will call me out on this - and disagree - but maybe he is here to win trophies, despite the fact Scottish cups and league titles mean nothing outside of Scotland? Surely he would have learn last time? It just sounds like his managerial style is poor. Maybe he is butting into team talks with Sally and this is why the away form is so dire. It does sound like he's a wind up merchant and trying to make money, and Rangers fans are pumping a stupid amount of cash into the company, but I don't think he is going to desert them unwillingly looking at that article. But, most likely, he's just too stupid to realise how much he is paying in wages and creating another financial black hole...
-
Money is the reason we didn't have a larger SPL when everyone wanted it. It was because there would be fewer Old Firm games! Which meant less Sky money. This is the reason punters are staying away. Quoted to death, but true - if you look after the sport the money will follow you, if you look after the money, you'll kill the sport. But why should Doncaster, Ogilvie care about the sport being killed? They have already made shitloads of money from it! They are here for the here and now, not the future! Which enrages me!
-
I don't think I'm coming across clearly, but the reason they pay to see these teams is that they might not ever see a Celtic vs Barcelona game again at Parkhead. Europeans draws are much less common than going to see the same team four times. All the SPL teams play each other too many times, but that's another discussion in its-self. St Johnstone played EsEs recently, their full back DeDe made more money than the entire team, but everyone went because it was a big game against a new team, with a different environment. They drew a massive crowd, despite going into the draw 2-0 down already. Sorry, I think I didn't put my point across correctly here. I mean the finance that it brings to the higher ups, like Doncaster etc. They must get a share of the TV profits, and they get bigger money. They devour our money and have no respect for us. They realise if Rangers go, they earn less. But if they got rid of them and Celtic went too (no disrespect to their supporters or team) they SPL would be so competitive and would attract many more fans back through the doors. I am sure of this, as anyone could win any game.
-
I have to believe and agree with this. No wonder Scottish football is in such a terrible shape. If Manchester United, the most well supported and popular club in the EPL went bust and was got rid of, everyone would still watch it. No-one would try and get them back in as the business model down there, unlike here, doesn't revolve around two clubs. Even if Chelsea, Spurs, Liverpool, Arsenal went broke and only left Manchester City, it still wouldn't be as bad. You would expect someone like Everton to give them a run for their money. The big teams down there are not expected to win every game. They do go in as favourites, but anything can happen. Celtic and Rangers were - for use of a better word - overpowered compared to all the other teams. You don't ever expect to win against these two, so no-one bother to attend these games. Rangers will never be gone. I wish they would as it would probably inspire Celtic to move on and would create a very competitive league. I mean, there are only 3 points between us and the leaders, and we are seventh! Everyone could take points off of everyone! I really wish they would go, but due to the powers that be and the finance they bring, they will always be back in some shape or form.
-
More (possible) evidence of players being lied to and behind the scene talks of Rangers jumping up a few leagues Link - http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/189133-sandaza-i-dont-care-what-critics-say-im-at-the-best-club-in-scotland/ Francisco Sandaza has shrugged off criticism of his move to the Third Division to play for Rangers, insisting he is at the best club in the country. The former St Johnstone striker was one of a number of players to drop down from Scottish Premier League level to join Ally McCoist’s team, after they were admitted into the Scottish Football League after failure to regain a place in the top tier. Critics have accused Sandaza and others of making the step down for financial reasons but the Spaniard insists his motivation is for sporting reasons. “I don't care,” Sandaza said of those who criticised his decision to move. “I am at the best club in Scotland. Since I arrived in Scotland I wanted to play for this team. “We are in the Third Division this year but I bet in a maximum of two years we will be in the top division again.” Sandaza also believes that, despite Rangers’ league status, they have as good a chance as before of success in the country’s top two cup competitions. He said: “This year we are going to try and achieve the Scottish Cup and League Cup. Maybe people think we will not achieve it but I have confidence. “I think the club have done a great job signing good players. To be honest, this is my club now and even in the Third Division, it is the best one.”
-
I'm sure there's a picture going round somewhere about SevCo being the company name currently, but doing business under the name Rangers. Again, I could be wrong. I don't claim to know much about business, but I know that there is a football club called Rangers which is about to investigated and probably going to liquidated and another football club also called Rangers playing football in the SFL3. Two companies CAN have the same name, but not in the same industry sector e.g. I could start a Graphic Design company called Microsoft, but not in the Computing sector. Hence why people are referring to them as SevCo. The only attachment these two Rangers companies have is that one used to play at Ibrox with a manager called Ally McCoist, as does the new one.