Jump to content

MK Col

Gold Members
  • Posts

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

15 Good

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • My Team
    Scotland
  1. So after all that, the verdict is GUILTY, but with a slap on the wrists as punishment for it? At least they died.
  2. Debt = £ owed to HMRC for non-payment of tax Liabilities = The billions of bigot fans NewGers inherited from OldGers
  3. With stadium naming, isn't it just another revenue stream? I'm not old enough to remember, but was there a fuss when company sponsors first appeared on shirts?
  4. To be fair, the last time something needed saving down Ibrox, they all sat on their hands and did nothing.
  5. I'm more of a lurker than a poster, so this may be stating the bleeding obvious. Surely these investor types must know that they are being wholly inaccurate when describe as Rangers having been in administration, when they have been liquidated. They must also surely know that they are reporting about a new company, so references to the old company returning is not correct. They also talk about investing in the club, when surely they mean investing in the holding company. The holding company owns the club, but can sell bits and pieces of their assets if they want to. You might as well say you're investing in Ally McCoist's syrup. You could go on about the whole "demoted" stuff, but thats also false. Is there not some kind of city watchdog that is responsible for ensuring the information being disseminated by the company being floated is accurate?
  6. Serious question. If "Rangers died for nothing" and an early decision could have saved them.... Why did the club withhold and conceal documents that might have made this whole process complete a long time ago? Seems to my uninitiated eyes that they thought they were bang to rights and were trying to cover it up. It will be interesting to see what happens when the tax man asks for the tax on the loans (not the repayments). For the rest of us, does this whole "loan that doesn't ever need to be paid back" give a whole new way to transfer money around without having to pay things like Capital Gains Tax or Inheritance Tax? Just give it as a loan and save yourself a bundle!
  7. <br /><br /><br />Rangers and Celtic are two cheeks of the same arse. It might have been helpful to explain why on their press release. However, just cos one of the cheeks has shit all over it doesn't mean the other does.
  8. As the debate on sport sound is proving, chuckie green should not be allowed to call his new club 'rangers', 'the rangers' or any similar variation. If its that difficult to tell the difference between the dead and brand new parrot, surely that's why there are rules on company names?
  9. I can confirm that. Barely registered as a blip in the news even on a no news day. Here's a novel idea. If these fans are so sure of rangers ability to pay their way, maybe they should sign up as guarantors along with their season tickets. Not so sure now I suppose.
  10. So McMoist is complaining about having £1.3m of prize money withheld. Now, I'm no expert and have had a few beers....but, wouldn't the prize money for last season be due to the oldco? So Sally has no right to complain about it. The liquidators can chase it if they want. In addition, every time someone from sevco brings up money it completely invalidates their entire argument....how much money did they owe and 'walk away' from?
×
×
  • Create New...