falkirktv
-
Posts
146 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by falkirktv
-
-
2 minutes ago, FairWeatherFan said:
Then how is it any different if they have a rental agreement with a company to provide the changing rooms and a deal with a contractor for the fencing they may or may not require?
You’d need planning for that, they don’t have it, and they don’t have a n agreement either, reliable source from inside syngenta
0 -
4 minutes ago, FairWeatherFan said:
Let's say the were renting out Falkirk Stadium. They have an agreement in principle, but no money's changed hands as its only a match by match basis.
Would that be acceptable to you?
No problem as long as they have a venue that meets criteria
0 -
3 minutes ago, FairWeatherFan said:
Yup. they've went through all that and forgot about the bloody ground!
Shocking oversight on their part
That’s my point if the ground is complaint in you come, if it’s not and you’ve known for a year then sorry but no.
running about telling people everyone will be on £40 a week, do you think that’s fair on the teams who like say swifts who spent the money on their ground. Is like 30k a year for playing staff, if you’ve that kind of cash you have enough to get your house in order.
0 -
3 minutes ago, Jason King said:
unless people in Camelon have their own opprobrium against certain teams.
I wonder, have Syngenta been looking to take the Camelon Under 20's?
Think they might be getting ahead of themselves if they think that
0 -
Just now, FairWeatherFan said:
Publicly announcing their intention a year in advance even though they never had to. Hiring a manager, asst manager & u20s coach. Plus continuing statements over a full pathway to senior football.
Yet to see one about their ground, if I recall swifts had at least a plan. This lot don’t, and to be honest I hope they get told to do one, will be encouraging people to vote against them, it’s not like there won’t be space in the juniors for them once the rest of east moves, except they won’t get in their either with the ground
-1 -
1 minute ago, FairWeatherFan said:
How do you know they don't have a plan?
Let's say they plan to hire out changing rooms. You want them to start paying rent on a facility now that won't be used till July.
Just now, falkirktv said:Why should they get any special treatment, get your ground ready then in you come
How do you know they do?
0 -
1 minute ago, Pyramidic said:
From recent posts I am forming the opinion that Syngenta are "not the flavour of the month" in your part of Falkirk!
When I used to be involved in youth football some clubs (managers) were a real turn off that we really disliked. Just wondering if there are any similar issues buried beneath your posts. Apologies if I am wrong.
From what I have read Syngenta would be a real credit to the EoSL. Personally I think that the EoSL management should be going that extra mile to help "incubate" progressive teams like Syngenta.Why should they get any special treatment, get your ground ready then in you come
0 -
4 minutes ago, FairWeatherFan said:
Doesn't really matter.
SFA/EOS "Are you going to spend x to meet our requirements to use LK?"
Bo'ness = nope, we're only their temporarily
Syngenta = yes, here's our plan/funding and the timescale we'll work to do that it's done in time for the 2019-20 season
Yeah if they had a plan that would be a start but they don’t do should get told to bolt!
0 -
Or the sfa never said anything to them at all.
0 -
3 minutes ago, FairWeatherFan said:
Going by the statement on here it was the SFA that said that. Not the EoS.
Why would it be the sfa? They will only be away from Bo’ness till end of season
0 -
Eosl already said Bo’ness can’t use that ground as it don’t meet criteria, I’d be amazed if they got in tbh
0 -
14 minutes ago, Kemlin Dan said:
This above probably says it all, word is they have been told already that they have been accepted.
Still has to be voted on, if the grounds not done has to be a no
0 -
12 minutes ago, FairWeatherFan said:
The only things they might have to resolve are changing rooms & adequate fencing around one of the pitches.
Fencing can be done up in the 3 months between Acceptance and start of the season. Changing rooms by hiring or purchasing modular units. Which again can be done between acceptance and start of the season.
Criteria 26 allows for them to be accepted without having those aspects in place.
Then they’ve had months to meet criteria, if you don’t meet it by agm. Should be no thanks, come back next year, the juniors already refused pennies from same ground as it don’t meet criteria
0 -
27 minutes ago, gaz5 said:
They applied last year, before the start of the season, before the criteria 'moved on'. Should they get derrogation against those changes, as they applied in good faith, or should they have to meet them all before being accepted given they have changed before they become EoS members.
And yes, I have worded that to draw parallels with the current arguments being made around licenses as it seems there are people who think different logic should be applied in each case.If they’d applied last year they’d be in already....
0 -
8 hours ago, GordonS said:
I don't know about pitch 2, but pitch one does have a fence round it in classic 3G cage style. There's space for changing rooms behind the north goal, but to create room for spectators they'd probably need to move the fence out on one side and put up a rail.
Criteria have moved on now compared to last year
0 -
I’d heard that they’re not applying now, costs scared them off. Not sure how accurate the source is
0 -
Just now, FairWeatherFan said:
Why would they when they haven't been accepted?
Cause without a ground you can’t be accepted
0 -
2 hours ago, FairWeatherFan said:
They did that last year as well telling an amateur to withdraw their application & try again the following year. Despite what some people seem to think they didn't just let everyone in.
Syngenta have had nearly a year to plan for this if they're still applying. If their intention is still to use Little Kerse I'm sure they've had discussions with the EoS and have prepared for additional work that might be required from acceptance to the start of the season.
Not done anything to make it complaint including planning to make it so.
0 -
18 minutes ago, Marten said:
Syngenta would join tier 7 if accepted. There is a decent chance they will be tier 8 in 2020. Imo, it makes sense for requirements to gradually go down as you get lower down the pyramid. I do agree that on tier 6 clubs should at least be working towards a license, but at tier 7 or 8 that makes no sense. These teams would need 2/3 promotions to get to the LL and nearly all of them are unlikely to ever get there. Ideally, I'd like not just all current juniors, but also the amateurs included in the pyramid. If tier 8 isn't very strict, amateurs at least have a chance of getting in there.
They should have a ground that meets the current crieria or be refused.
1 -
22 minutes ago, Burnie_man said:
Why would the SFA be inspecting Little Kerse? as for Camelon, you sure the pitch would stand upto it, there are sanded areas already on it.
Only because we had an issue with a fox.
0 -
49 minutes ago, TheLad said:18 hours ago, Kemlin Dan said:Pretty much why Syngenta put their application in as well, they had no path way and with the real Clubs around them moving to 20s they jumped onboard, Little Kerse and its suitability for EOS will come to light over the next couple of weeks.
What is it about Little Kerse that concerns people?
It don’t meet the criteria
0 -
6 minutes ago, AlanCamelonfan said:
I think for you guys Talbot the west is straight forward wrsjfa slots straight in. East is just a major headache
See if the west all joined the SOS, and they did conferences in first year like the east did, within a couple of seasons the south teams would filter downwards and you'd not need a PWG or anything else as it would be job done.
2 -
2 hours ago, Ginaro said:
The office bearers/board can offer a period of grace for clubs to meet the entry criteria. Tweedmouth is a club that has been mentioned as having had some time to improve their facilities. And who is "the rest of us" and "our grounds" you're referring to?
Anyone who has a ground who meets criteria, was not having a go at any current club, however why would you take a new club who clearly can’t meet the criteria.
1 -
The only thing holding up a West league is the sjfa...
0
New clubs in the East of Scotland
in East of Scotland Football League
Posted
You’d need to ask the shire about that, suspect they want to be at Falkirk stadium because it’s a big ground and I. Falkirk