A Believer

"At least now the Lowland League are get that all important social media plug." I'm sure we are, I think; maybe....eh?

Fair point about learning variations of styles and tactics; but I don't think part time coaches have player by player physical and nutritional development plans they review every week.

1. Shows what you know 2. Didn't say they didn't, the words were consistency and quality. So you think a Utd loanee would benefit from coaching from a part time coach over a full time one?

Except that development of young players has more chance of success when:- - young players play regularly (loan players tend to be on the bench) - they receive consistent high quality coaching messages (not saying loan clubs give bad coaching, just different)

Great stuff [emoji106] Regretfully some won't let factual trend analysis get in the way of good old fashioned deep-seated opinion based on anecdote.

Does this herald this thread now being devoid of any salient point. So Croatia lose 1-0 away to the 2nd favourites for the Euros [emoji848]

I agree. Not about me being a troll mind.

Gie it yer best shot [emoji23][emoji1022]󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

An understandable concern, however this was covered at SLFL meeting, and the highest placed SLFL club will be champions notwithstanding where the colts finish [emoji106]

What makes you so sure they didn't.

'Foot in the door'...[emoji85][emoji23] Naw, it's just not. The rest also has absolutely nothing to do with, what is, a ONE YEAR, no strings attached deal. One and gone. And how's the play off agreement relevant when there was no play off from the tier below. More baying at the moon(ster)...

Have they, have they really. No, beyond unsubstantiated anti old firm whataboutery, I've not seen one. Go on, humour me. But remember:- 1. It's a year. 2. There are no clauses linking it to any other initiatives. 3. There were no promotions, so it's not getting in the way of progress from the tier below. Without liberal use of 'likely', 'probably' and sticking to actual fact, tell me why this is bad for anyone?

1. It's a year. 2. There are no clauses linking it to any other initiatives. 3. There were no promotions, so it's not getting in the way of progress from the tier below. Without liberal use of 'likely', 'probably' and sticking to actual fact, tell me why this is bad for anyone else? Fire on with 'disgrace', 'rancid' and 'hope your club dies' I can hear your knuckles dragging from here...

Yahoorsir, it's a campaign o guff fi Fife....[emoji23]

Can't believe this thread is still running. The fact that it is, and largely populated with general anti old firm rhetoric, tells me that this was the basis for most 'concerns' rather than the unsubstantiated guff about pyramids or integrity. It's happening, get over it; but feel free to rant on, it's your right.