-
Posts
6,538 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Reynard
-
-
How convenient.
How did Christianity and Judaism get here? What happened to our native, indigenous paganism? Why were nine million women killed by the Catholic Church?
Islam like Christianity and Judaism all stem from the same source - all are Semite Abrahamic religions from the same place. All are 'foreign'. Maybe Christianity came here first - doesn't make it less foreign.
As to immigrantion and multi-culturalism....
My kids are half-German. Are they inferior or a threat because of this? In school, there are classmates who are either fully or 'half' French, Italian, Polish, English, Bulgarian, American and Irish. Most of them are bilingual. Is this really a problem? Is this a threat to our 'native' pure culture/ race - whatever that may be?
What was the muslim popilation of the uk say in 1965?
And what is it now?
Do the same across Europe. How many are "converts",?
Islam is a cancer in our society.
0 -
If that was half white half blue I reckon thats your permanent expression.
0 -
So Mr S is misleading us then when he says its available to Scotland. Talking of doing better is this under spend still a deliberate fund? Or bad management by councils?
Yes. He was wheeled out yesterday to unzip and give the clown collective something to suck on.
I wonder what the underspend is for referendum year. I bet its horrible.
0 -
Who did?
THe SNP apparently.
Havent heard a single thing from them pressing the government for this all the same. I reckon its just a figment of Strickens fevered imagination.
Still waiting for Parp and Wizbit to explain how 11% of the Scottish economy is a "bonus".
0 -
Its £95 actually. And thats only for onshore.
Whats solar?
Hinckley will be 92.50 and this drops under 90 once sizewell goes ahead.
Unlucky as they say.
Did you find out that coals the cheapest way to generate electricity yet as you frantically howked through google?
0 -
I am pretty sure that they wanted to cut taxes for all companies.
I don't hear them pressing the government on this. I only hear them bitch whining about the oil and gas sector.
Why?
0 -
Coal is not the cheapest way to generate electricity. If you believe otherwise, then I would be interested to see the source of the data.
It is. By far
0 -
Areshole.
Whats the strike price on wind falling to?
0 -
OK. So do you dispute that nuclear will be more expensive than wind when the new Hinckley is operational?
Yep.
The strike price has already been agreed for Hinckley and its cheaper than Wind is NOW. Both on and offshore. Didn't you know that?
0 -
Would we have been independent at this time if it was a yes vote? No. That would have been Spring 2016.
Until we know the prices at that time, then this thread is pointless
The one year projection is currently $52 a barrel.
The old Swinney tactic.
We dont have to worry about it because we have the protection of the utterly huge UK economy
0 -
This has no relevance to the post you responded to. Profit based tax = tax paid on profits. If the industry is in such a bad way with the current oil price, surely there will be no profit to tax?
And what relevance has yours got? Its pretty basic stuff that you get taxed on profit.
I was just wondering why supposed socialists are calling for tax breaks etc for a particular industry?
0 -
Expensive energy fucks the economy over. We will see that low oil prices is a boost for the economy in the next year or so or however long it lasts.
We should be doing all we can to make electricity as cheap as possible. Bin the green targets completely. No need for them anyway.
0 -
If you want to go back even further, we also imported christianity. An argument on the beliefs of each religion is still not relevant to politics or immigration.
No lets just keep it to the past thirty of forty years.
We've imported Islam. And Islam is causing a problem because elements wont integrate which has led to the likes of Merkel admitting that the multicultural experiment has "utterly failed". Even muslims themselves admitted this on Panorama on Monday night.
0 -
Currently or in the future? Perhaps providing some figures......oops sorry.
Currently
0 -
That's as mis-leading a statement as you could make. The current strike price for wind is irrelevant when comparing to nuclear until the nuclear plants are up and running. At this point nuclear will be more heavily subsidised than onshore wind.
For someone on here telling us how cheap nuclear is, perhaps you can explain why EDF even need a guaranteed price. I would like to see someone as right wing as yourself tell us why market forces appear to not work in a de-regulated business.
Its not deregulated.
The government sets energy policy. The cheapest way to produce energy is to use coal. If it was a totally free market then we'd be using coal. Simple as that.
Why are we not using coal? Ask yourself that and once you come up with the answer you'll maybe begin to understand... then again
0 -
That's as mis-leading a statement as you could make. The current strike price for wind is irrelevant when comparing to nuclear until the nuclear plants are up and running. At this point nuclear will be more heavily subsidised than onshore wind.
For someone on here telling us how cheap nuclear is, perhaps you can explain why EDF even need a guaranteed price. I would like to see someone as right wing as yourself tell us why market forces appear to not work in a de-regulated business.
Nuclear is cheaper than renewables.
Renewables are the most expensive and unreliable method we have of producing energy.
0 -
I didn't see the interview. So can't comment on what went on between the pair.
Perhaps you can comment on Salmond being exposed as a liar by Neil. Were you seething at your hero ?
I'm going to guess at No.
The reaction from committed nationalists at the time when Salmond was exposed as a liar by Neil was to rally round him. He is held to much lower standards than any other politician by the NCC.
0 -
The oil was an extra, so no mess.
The same applies to you.
Oil is over 11% of the Scottish economy.
Explain in great detail why this is described as "extra". Thanks.
0 -
You can tell them that until you're blue in the face, they won't take any notice.
Oil, according to the Scottish governments own GERS figures is over 11% of the Scottish economy.
Can you explain to us in great detail why this is being described as "extra". Thanks.
And can you pony up some numbers run through the same economic model Salmond was using prior to the referendum to show just exactly what low oil prices will do to the scottish economy? Thanks.
0 -
So their supporters are 'practically all' in England and Wales ?
True. Well apart from all their Scottish supporters.
Im absolutely LOVING the way the nat clown collective are so incredibly ruffled by a party thats about as relevant as the greens. All kinds of searching for reasons how the likes of Scotland could ever manage to elect a thoroughly English problem like Ukip.
Fucking tremendous.
Having that utter dipshit Ennoni traipsing around the forum after me whining about it since the Europeans has been hilarious too. The SNP, definitely NOT bothered about Ukip
0 -
Salmond - £113-£150 a barrel
Reality - $46.59 a barrel
Has ANY nationalist managed to work out what sort of mess this would have left an independent Scotland in? Maybe the fantastic BfS has run the numbers? Or the loopy Rev down in Somerset? No? Nothing?
Silencccccce!!
0 -
I found it rather funny that Oil & Gas UK were calling for the abolition of the Supplementary Charge. A tax that is payable on profits.
If things are a bad as they are saying then surely 32% of 0 = 0% of 0.
I found it rather funny that a binch of "socialists" realise that cutting tax actually allows business to increase investment and therefore the tax yield down the line. But ONLY for one sector of the economy.
Do you think the "socialist" SNP are operating huge double standards or anything like that? Or are you just going to brainlessly join in the calls for tax cuts even though its against all you stand for ideologically?
0 -
Unusual for the forum's resident psephologist to deny us another Mittens-esque prediction. Is it because you already know that UKIP will receive their ritual shoeing at the hands of the Scottish electorate in May, and again 12 months later?
How many seats do you think the SNP are going to win in May?
I think Ukip will win none in te GE they might get one via the list at Holyroo, who knows.
And when do you think the SNP will start to approve applications to start fracking
As we are asking questions for no reason at all...Maybe tiny tears can have a shot as those.
0 -
Is there not a dedicated forum for debating the merits of different religions. Not really anything to do with either politics or immigration.
We've imported Islam via the immigration system.
0
British Xmas TV
in The Politics Forum
Posted
No