Jump to content

repeat_offender

Gold Members
  • Posts

    245
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

23 Excellent

Profile Information

  • My Team
    Scotland

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Anything could happen, we could score 3 away from home or concede 4 in the 1st half, must be a nightmare for the lads setting the odds.
  2. No excuses, took a cuffing, well done Crawley.
  3. They'd won five out of six by that stage the season before though, so it's not much of an indication that they wouldn't collapse. We're kind of going down the if "my Aunt had b*lls she'd be my Uncle" route here. If your logic prevails there wouldn't be much point in playing future seasons games, we should just accept what ever happened in the previous season will happen again the following season. LUFC's form was great pre lockdown & great post lockdown. Not sure if you watched the games on the run into the lockdown but they weren't showing signs of flagging / fatigue, on the contrary I felt they were on fire imo (played, 5, won 5, conceded 0). For me the games couldn't come fast enough & I'd say the pretty universally feeling was let's crack on while the going is good amongst the Leeds fans I know.
  4. I have some sympathy with that comment, maybe it's a generational thing but I just don't see the need for the club to get involved in a public twitter row. I'm not on twitter myself but have seen a few posts from the club which I think shouldn't have been made. I'd suggest that who ever is in charge of the social media account needs taking to task but I'm aware others would view me as a digital dinosaur. Leeds have long been on the receiving end when it comes to negative comments, some warranted, some unwarranted, if anybody involved with the club isn't able to tolerate the inevitable slings and arrows that will be incoming then Leeds isn't the club for them
  5. I've been watching Leeds since the 80's, I'd have to think very hard to try and come up with Leeds sides that are more pleasing on the eye.
  6. I realise this makes me a football dinasaur but I'd say a case of something and nothing. Bamford's 3rd there looked pretty decent so he seems to have recovered ok.
  7. 100% agree BWV, blatent power grab.
  8. Yes, there is a bit about that in the link below. https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/sport/football/manchester-city-star-aymeric-laporte-hails-influence-leeds-united-boss-marcelo-bielsa-214393
  9. I think "woosh" was accurate, still grasping here Guv, back home was the show's theme tune. You might have to draw me a picture
  10. Okay, make it simple for me. Re your comment below which leagues do you feel are important and what criteria do you use to determine they are? If that question demonstrates I'm having a "woosh" episode feel free to explain why, don't be frightened you'll embarrass me, I've got a pretty thick skin.
  11. It has been a competitve, entertaining league. What criteria applies for leagues to be considered important in your opinion? Is it the case that this league is unimportant to you for no other reason than you have no affiliation to any of the teams that play in it?
  12. Their credability with me evaporated the moment they elected to give Shaun Harvey the top job.
  13. I'm pretty sure @RandomGuy has hit the nail on the head here, I really don't think he'd see success at Real Madrid, Juventus, Barcelona etc as a worthy enterprise, I doubt he sees winning something with those clubs as a real achievment. As othesr have said here he isn't renowned for long spells in club management and we should just enjoy him whilst he's here. I do question how practical it is for him to sustain the level of work he puts in long term, inevitably he'll move on and we''ll beome Bielsa widows
×
×
  • Create New...