DeeTillEhDeh

It's the sort of phrase you use when couples live together but are no longer in a relationship. Make of that what you will.

It's a UK Act with subsections for Scotland and NI.

I would think it would go to trial. If it didn't there would be accusations of a cover-up etc. If there were a not guilty verdict then another can of worms will be opened - it would be like Salmond Mk2.

No actually - see the example below from 2014. https://hsfnotes.com/asiadisputes/2014/08/22/uk-court-of-appeal-confirms-extra-territorial-reach-of-contempt-proceedings/

The relevance is that a policy can be supported by a sizeable majority of MSPS and still be a shite policy. Ownership of shite policies is not the preserve of the SNP.

And where did I say it was? More the point that it's not just an SNP policy.

Binning the Greens and Yousaf is the only way to go.

I'm no fan of MUP but this is a policy supported by every political party at Holyrood bar the Scottish Tories.

Apart from the usual "it's an MI5 conspiracy" tinfoil hatters most Nats are, quite rightly, rather subdued on the matter.

I thought it might be worth sharing this - it explains what is and what isn't CoC in terms of social media (including website forums and blogs) - it is in relation to a Sarah Everard but goes on to mske general points about CoC. https://theconversation.com/sarah-everard-social-media-and-the-very-real-danger-of-contempt-of-court-157068 In short, you can report on actual facts of the case but are not allowed to discuss the trial itself. You are allowed to have a wider discussion, for example, we can discuss wider issues such as political party funding and financial accountability within political parties. Hope this helps.

Some folk on X are sailing very close to the wind regards CoC.

Called it. There was definitely a hint in the reporting online by the BBC - had the feel of a report that did not want to prejudice any prospective trial.

I'm saying that they can't keep arresting him without charge - you would think they would charge this time. The way this is being reported on the BBC is emphasising very much the issue of contempt of court. I wonder which fool will be the first to fall foul? PS I've consistently said the police should be left to investigate and if evidence found then appropriate charges made.

You would think there would have to be charges now or the case just fizzles out. Arrest him again and it will look like a fishing trip by the police.

Another sock puppet heading straight for the Politics forum. Just bin the racist little fucker.

Where's Rangers fine for the pyrotechnics in the previous match?

Another case of c**t FC whinging and these wankers getting their way. Should take this further.

Motherwell were only given a suspended fine - Dundee will be consulting their lawyers I suspect.

Same starting team vs Celtic?

Completely agree - he was tremendous last night.

He's gone full Pedro. 1. It's the pitch. 2 They man-marked us. 3. It was a moral victory. And I could go on.

Citeh out.

At the end we looked more likely to score than Rangers.