DeeTillEhDeh

If the Bute House agreement collapses he might just be.

Lee Miller with a "things that didn't happen" story. Dundee - BBC Sport The pitch was perfectly fine the first game of the season.

You think it would be over the next few days. Any longer and it's bound to start the conspiracy theorists on both sides.

I personally thought Oppenheimer was dreadful. Overbloated, and, dare I say it, verging on the turgid.

36 years without being in the top flight.

36 years.

You couldn't fight sleep.

Imagine having Lundstrom, Scales and Tavernier in that team. Utter nonsense.

Watching Baldemort's interview again - utterly delusional.

Joined: 1 hour ago. Heads straight to Politics forum.

It's the sort of phrase you use when couples live together but are no longer in a relationship. Make of that what you will.

It's a UK Act with subsections for Scotland and NI.

I would think it would go to trial. If it didn't there would be accusations of a cover-up etc. If there were a not guilty verdict then another can of worms will be opened - it would be like Salmond Mk2.

No actually - see the example below from 2014. https://hsfnotes.com/asiadisputes/2014/08/22/uk-court-of-appeal-confirms-extra-territorial-reach-of-contempt-proceedings/

The relevance is that a policy can be supported by a sizeable majority of MSPS and still be a shite policy. Ownership of shite policies is not the preserve of the SNP.

And where did I say it was? More the point that it's not just an SNP policy.

Binning the Greens and Yousaf is the only way to go.

I'm no fan of MUP but this is a policy supported by every political party at Holyrood bar the Scottish Tories.

Apart from the usual "it's an MI5 conspiracy" tinfoil hatters most Nats are, quite rightly, rather subdued on the matter.

I thought it might be worth sharing this - it explains what is and what isn't CoC in terms of social media (including website forums and blogs) - it is in relation to a Sarah Everard but goes on to mske general points about CoC. https://theconversation.com/sarah-everard-social-media-and-the-very-real-danger-of-contempt-of-court-157068 In short, you can report on actual facts of the case but are not allowed to discuss the trial itself. You are allowed to have a wider discussion, for example, we can discuss wider issues such as political party funding and financial accountability within political parties. Hope this helps.

Some folk on X are sailing very close to the wind regards CoC.

Called it. There was definitely a hint in the reporting online by the BBC - had the feel of a report that did not want to prejudice any prospective trial.