haufdaft

We shouldn't base our future signings on their performances against Clyde. Karim Belmokhtar being the perfect example.

Don't forget Maryhill and Hamilton [emoji16] We should shrink the size of the ship to make room for all the locations.

We've been in Cumbernauld for over two decades. We've tried multiple things to snare new support, most recently, free child entry and still we have no substantial increase in attendance. Changing the badge will have absolutely no effect. Leave Cumbernauld Colts with the town name. We'll take the tradition and the fame.

It does matter to many Clyde fans. Having the town name on the badge means absolutely nothing to anyone except existing Clyde fans. The general population of Cumbernauld won't give a f**k. Most won't even see the badge. It doesn't lead to engagement in any meaningful way. I've no objection to Cumbernauld being in the shirt replacing or in addition to a sponsors name. Then the Cumbernaulders would see it in newspapers etc.

I think you mean founded [emoji16] What other clubs not named after a town have the home town on the badge? It seems to me it's a pointless exercise that only antagonises many of the support.

After the meeting last night I did wonder if there had been expressions of interest in investing in the club re. CIC Ltd. I'm not keen on any change to the badge. I support the team not the town. An interesting AGM.

My mum says I'm not fat. Just big boned.

I've no problem with the "shrieker". This lady gets excited watching Clyde and shows it. Nothing wrong with that at all. I'd much rather listen to her than some of the grumpy buggers that sit near me. In fact, there are a couple of Clyde supporters who regularly attend away games that would make your ears bleed. Only foul mouthed vitriol comes from them (usually towards Clyde players). Little humour. I tend not to sit near them if I can.

A couple of posters have stated that Currie is a good/decent shot stopper. I can't agree. Rarely does he pull off a save you wouldn't expect him to. He plays as we have no better alternative. I'm sorry but McStay is not "exceptionally talented". League two is his level. Like Currie, he plays as we have no better alternative.

True. I do have a theory that Clyde teams in over the last decade only play well for one half in any game * It was a cracking match in which Clyde created many chances in both halves and were defensively poor in both halves. I was on the edge of my seat whenever the ball was near any goalmouth. That's why i enjoyed it so much. The excitement made my auld heart beat like a drum and made me feel young and virile again. ** * No doubt easily disproven. **Very easily disproven.

Looking at the highlights, I think Berwick's first two goals look offside. The first looks like the cross hits the Berwick player on its way through to the goal scorer who's standing in an offside position. The second, I think the scorer who comes in outside of the back post looks marginally offside too when the ball is played. I'm happy to be corrected by folk who were in better positions at the match.

Best game for a few seasons. End to end with almost every attack ending in a shot.

Deleted (duplicate post)

Yet no left or right back cover of quality other than converted midfielders. Why re-sign Duffie and Millar and sign Gorman. None are close to being regulars or putting pressure on others to perform. Wasted money Jury is still out on Belmokhtar .

Are we now saying that Hughes is not good enough to be an alternative to Currie?