It would be interesting to know who on here had actually heard or read the speech in its entirety before they commented on it. I'm not condoning the speech at all but I have a feeling there are a few on here who are talking about it because of what they have been told about it rather than what they think about it. For my part, his speech was a viewpoint then and is now. He was shouted down at the time (That's why it's infamous) and would be again today. Giving his speech exposure is just the same as broadcasting one of Hitler's speeches - you get to see the context and the passion but you also get to rip the shit out of the ridiculous pish they are coming out with!