Jump to content

Busta Nut

Platinum Members
  • Posts

    9,268
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Busta Nut

  1. 35 minutes ago, welldaft said:

     

    The Board made it clear that we need outside investment if we are to continue to compete with the majority of clubs in the top flight who do benefit from substantial outside / owner investment on an ongoing basis. That I think we can all agree with.

    I am not comfortable with this view. 
    Firstly on what "competing" actually means. Secondly on who said it and how it was put across at a time when they were pushing their agenda they'd been backed into. 

    Again I know nothing really other than what I see and read myself. I'm not very well versed in these things but I have my doubts.
     

  2. On 22/04/2024 at 14:29, johnoswald2712 said:

    I asked this question on Twitter as I honestly don’t know the answer. In games when VAR isn’t used, is level onside? Does the advantage go to the attacker? The answer to these questions used to be yes but now I honestly don’t know. If the rules have been changed do these changes only apply in games using VAR? Seems to me that different rules apply in different games. Surely that can’t be right 

    I seem to remember a Hu-ns goal given against Motherwell where the rangers player was slightly ahead "but the lines were touching" or some shite like that.

  3. Quote


    Investor meeting

    0ac98a4b-85fb-d0b0-b39d-4c73d5faff6f.jpeg

    The Well Society board met with Erik Barmack last Sunday, during his visit to discuss potential investment in Motherwell Football Club with the Club Board and attend games at Fir Park.

    The meeting allowed him to share a high-level outline of his vision and offer and gave us the opportunity to impress our thoughts on him over issues such as governance, finances, the valuation of the Club and the proposed level of shareholding.

    We now await developments between the Club and Erik Barmack. Should discussions between those two parties lead to a formal proposal, we will formulate our position on whether we, as the elected representatives of The Well Society, believe an agreement would be beneficial to the Club.

    We understand that there is a lot of uncertainty around the current situation as discussions continue. However, we would like to assure Well Society members, again, that if and when we have further information to share, we will do so. And, again, we stress that no change will happen to the Society's shareholding in the football club without approval from members.

    For background, see the initial Club statement and a previous statement from The Well Society Board's response.

    Not seen the newsletter mentioned on here since Friday so while I've got 10 mins I thought I'd highlight it.

    Seems like a heavily edited way of saying "Raise massive concerns". I'm not surprised.I know not much can be said about valuations and amounts of shares involved but if what ye hear is anywhere near, get it in the sea

     

  4. 3 hours ago, thisGRAEME said:

    Also can we stop hooking Davor as a standard option, we go to pieces every fucking time.

     

    2 hours ago, wellboy1991 said:

    Yip, taking Davor and Vale off every time is getting frustrating.
     

    Vale is being played too wide and too deep. Needs to be right up beside Bair with Spittal in the 10 role behind them. We are taking any Vale goal scoring threat right out the team essentially playing as a second right back.
     

    I mean Vale would have buried that Shaw chance that’s for sure. 

     

    It's amazing how people can see this yet SK insists on his weird 5-2-3 but with two wide players (Vale & Spittal). As you said tuck Spittal in behind and move Vale up front.

    Also glad you two appreciate Davor, there's two or three other people who don't seem to.






    In addition, Andy Halliday not very good? Quelle surprise!

     

     

     

     

  5. Hope the [End section] have big banners telling these plums to chase themselves.


     

    1 hour ago, StAndrew7 said:

     

    Also, Elizabeth Banks has been an all timer for me ever since her appearances in Scrubs 😍

    Agree here, I love Elizabeth Banks, She's an all time great yer right.


    Someone on here (a well fan) used to love Scrubs (along with a few of us) but I can't mind who, sure they had Scrubs themed usernames 

×
×
  • Create New...