accietilleyedye

You seem to be desperately trying to distance yourself from your club chairman, whilst inveigling your way on to Douglas Park's bus why is that

So you speculate that Park and the board feels there is a benefit , and are happy with your own speculation, no wonder your club died

In my case it is hatred that wants title , stripping , hatred for cheats. That oldco Rangers are the cheats, surely is only coincidental and any other cheats who are found, should also have any tainted titles/cups stripped, Rangers have had too much kid gloves treatment, treat them like all cheats not a special one

You had to edit that and still got it wrong Glasshouses, people, living in, stones throwing and all that

30 million rand is about 1.4 million quid so maybe he was glib and shameless but he may not have lied

Don't buy from Jumblesale.com , Someone from Sports Direct needs to buy that domain quick and get it pointed to their online store

Maybe he did nae buy it , perhaps he shoplifted it

I am good, enjoying this new batch of hilarity , how about you

Yep 99.5% of other people are thinking yep what a fucking tosser the_kincardine is . Must be good knowing you got one right today

Copied you by doing something different , I obviously copied the content of this post word for word from something you said then

Dad why did you feel you had to pretend to be a little Viking boy when mum kicked you out

That you don't care is obvious, you abuse the facts in an attempt to pervert them to your way of thinking yet never addressing issues that undermine your way of life , I will let you get back to saving for your kids university educations , just don't be too upset that once they have received that hard fought for higher education when they look back at history and ask you Dad, why you support a club that died and why do you cling to an argument about another dead club that doesn't prove your point in any way shape or fashion

I didn't ask if they(HMRC) agreed to the sale in principle, the administrators did though, as you are obviously well aware, the sale then went on to succeed with the tacit agreement of HMRC "Taxman pulls out of Leeds United court challenge". So either address the questions asked or do a bennett and disappear when you are asked a difficult question you don't want to answer as it doesn't suit your argument or you genuinely don't know how to answer

In which case was the sale of the club and it's assets agreed(in principle) before the failure of the CVA ? In which case did the HMRC agree to the sale after the failure of the CVA and receive monies owed by the 'failed' company?

Where's the solace in all that