-
Posts
5,955 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by No8.
-
Not missing any point. There was a football club there and they were put into the lowest tier of league football... And before you say it Spartans went on record as saying there was no point standing against them as the club from Govan had far more to offer and they could not compete so wouldn't waster their money trying. Now feel free to answer the questions I asked
-
Ok...I know your hatred of all things clouds your judgement.... I am feeling generous today. I ll ask you...Do you think these 'punishments' were put in place to help or hinder Rangers? You believe Rangers are a new club so if Rangers are a new club why were they being punished for the crimes of s completely different entity?
-
You are either at it or are not quite up with why the SFA went against the UEFA directive to shut the window on the Monday and not the Saturday. Leaving the window open would have allowed Rangers 24 hours to register players. Rangers never volunteered anything ffs. They were forced to accept these conditions...conditions with the sole purpose of hampering their progress.
-
The reason the Scottish game is treated as inferior is because it is inferior. The record low viewing figures for live Sky games are Spl games. I believe the lowest was a St Mirren v Ross County game from last season. That may have been outdone this season. If you take the TV Money then you can't really complain.
-
You mean like making the 'new club' pay the 'old clubs' footballing debt while withholding the money owed to the 'old club'? You mean like when the SFA went against a UEFA directive and closed a transfer window early ensuring Rangers didn't have 24hours to sign players? Like the way they withheld Rangers licence until 24 hours before their first game against Brechin so they couldn't play warm up games? You mean the help they gave Rangers by forcing a registration embargo on them so they couldn't register players. Aye we should be forever thankful to the footballing authorities. They made sure we did it all on our own and owe them absolutely nothing.
-
So it is Ok for a public funded company to employ a failed football hooligan who is a raging bigot? Chris Graham was taking the piss out of a terrorist. Chris Graham was there to represent the Rsngers fans and the vast majority fully supported him. I am sorry but your opinion or the opinion of any other hater means absolutely nothing to me regarding this. Very similar to when one of the countries top lawyers was forced out of our club for singing a folk song.
- 202,080 replies
-
-10
-
I believe Chris Graham did the right thing. He knew the MSM were never going to let this go and for the good of the club he resigned. The thing that sticks in my throat is people like MT who will condemn CG out of hand as he is connected to a football club he openly admits to didliking verging on hating. I dont remember MT being so openly critical of raging bigot Stuart Cosgrove. Maybe you were and i missed it. If i did then here is your opportunity to castigate the raging bigot and demand he is sacked by the publicly funded BBC