Jump to content


Gold Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

557 Excellent


About Jamie_Beatson

Profile Information

  • My Team

Recent Profile Visitors

10,485 profile views
  1. Partick Thistle's big issue was that they were shite at the back and, as much as they played some nice passing football, they didn't really control the flow of the game. Teams like Saints were happy just to watch them knock the ball about in front of the defence safe in the knowledge they were likely to score at the other end. The same was true in the early part of Dundee's relegation season when their fans were sure they just needed a better striker than Moussa to turn things around. But they had clownshoes like Darren O'Dea at the back so you knew you were going to get chances. Saints probably were the better team in terms of controlling the game yesterday. I don't think we gave away much of anything at the back again and certainly in the second half didn't look like we'd concede. The Motherwell goal was a nice bit of football but Kerr does brilliantly to block the initial chance - only for it to pop up beautifully for O'Hara to smash into the net. That's the kind of thing that's happened quite a lot this season - where we've conceded from a rebound (yesterday, Hamilton's goal from the shot that came back off the bar) or from a non-chance (Vigurs v County) - is that bad luck or is there something we're not doing right? The difference between yesterday's game and the likes of the County/Dundee United games is that we didn't turn the superiority in the middle and comfort at the back into real, clear cut chances. Kane needs to do better with his at the end but even then the defender may well have stopped it if he'd kept it down. Plenty of crosses put in yet again - and I actually felt the delivery was better yesterday than it has been - but there's nobody really attacking it. That's where you want a Callum Hendry, but we know how his form has been. If we had last season's Callum Hendry firing at that rate we'd be in the top four. I don't think I can fault the structure, how well drilled the players are or how they're applying the system. The high press we employ leaves the opposition either likely to make a mistake - see our goal yesterday - or having to launch it long, which we are more than happy to deal with. The balance across the team is great and we look so comfortable most of the time. But the decision making at the top end is the big issue. There was a point in the first half yesterday when May turned on the ball and basically had a three on two - with a tricky reverse pass for Wotherspoon or an easy ball into Conway the options. He tried to reverse it to Wotherspoon and hit the defender. He couldn't have missed the pass to Conway. As the second half wore on Wotherspoon's crossing absolutely deserted him and everybody in a blue shirt lost the ability to play a 5/10 yard pass with any confidence. I think when Motherwell brought on Lamie and basically gave up on any thought of winning the match we should have brought on Hendry for May and either Kane or Melamed for Wotherspoon. Hendry's job would have been just to stand between the posts and attack every cross that comes in, and the rest of the team would have been trying to feed McNamara or Tanser to get the ball into the box. Instead we spent our time overplaying it, losing possession in dangerous areas or - when we did get the cross in - ballooning it out of the park. I'm a believer in this system - it is obviously working in terms of giving us the upper hand in virtually every game we play - or at least neutralising the threat of our opponents - but the end product has to improve drastically.
  2. I felt like we should have brought on any two of Kane, Hendry and Melamed for Spoony and May when Motherwell brought Lamie on. We left it too late to do much when Kane did come on. He did well outside the box and worked it wide but who was there to hit? I’d rather have had Hendry on at the same time to offer that option or alternatively Melamed to see if he could offer something different. May was done and Wotherspoon had become ineffective by that point.
  3. Ali McCann’s reading of the game is exceptional. Glad we’ve got back level here. Much the same as so many games this season-very comfortable and not giving up much of anything at the back but not creating enough clear chances in the final third, and when we do not taking them. That Wotherspoon opportunity was a gift.
  4. I see we’re doing this making shit decisions in front of goal thing again. Come on to f**k.
  5. As always, I’m praying this is the week we actually start scoring. Or maybe even just get a massive slice of luck with the opposition keeper chucking one in or something. Suspect we’ll be back to a familiar line up (barring injuries) with Conway/Spoony alongside May, McCann and Davidson centrally and the usual back five in front of Clark. Interested to see Melamed at some point hopefully. He had some decent touches against Peterhead albeit in horrendous conditions to make any real judgement on him.
  6. So is it just me that thought MOH was really ineffective yesterday? Lots of driving runs with the ball but too easily dispossessed and nothing really came from any of it? Melamed had some really nice touches. Will be interesting to see him on a pitch that’s not so heavy and not in a driving wind...
  7. They’re definitely there in person. Peterhead’s goal was completely missed by the camera - which was on the centre circle - but they knew it was in and commentated on it as normal. The issue is that the audio is gubbed on this and has been intermittent at best from the start!
  8. I assume this company provide all the gear and take the subs etc and provide the online platform. But do they have to insist on the AI camera? Surely that can be overridden? 3-0 - not that we knew because the camera missed the ball going past the keeper and the audio cut out again!
  9. Camera and sound have turned to absolute shit as the game has progressed.
  10. You heard me. He’s only 28, and has 250+ appearances at Championship/EPL level and 30 Scotland caps. That’s not an accident. He’s not an incredible player by any stretch but he’d be excellent at Scottish Premiership level. Beside Kerr obvs, not replacing him. For what it’s worth, from that list I’d definitely say Kerr is the best ball player out of them by a comfortable margin.
  11. I’d gotten the wrong end of the stick there as well VB. Of your list I’d take Cooper, McKenna and Hanley for CB. McCrorie is a good player but a midfielder first and foremost. The rest are not better than Kerr. Porteous is a disaster zone and I can’t believe how often he’s been called up. Even Declan Gallacher has been well off form in the league until the last week or two-though you can’t argue with his Scotland performances. Kerr will leave us next summer and probably get a call up by this time next year.
  12. If it gets much worse I don’t think there'll be much option about that.
  13. Fog is getting worse and worse. Playing fine but shot selection - Conway in particular - has been poor.
  • Create New...