Jump to content

sophia

Gold Members
  • Posts

    5,907
  • Joined

Posts posted by sophia

  1. 9 hours ago, Zetterlund said:

    I have no idea who someone called Sydney Sweeney is, but in the last few days Twitter/X is absolutely determined to convince me that she's very important and that I need to pay attention to everything she says & does. Literally every 4th or 5th post is her.

    Presumably there's some kind of 'show man boobs, man click on ads' algorithm going on.

    Don't get angry

     

    NYPICHPDPICT000030394680.jpg

  2. 18 hours ago, scottbamby said:

    I’ll have some of whatever medication you’re on Sophia.

    Missed the nail by about a kilometre as usual.

    I'm not at all sure what you are getting at. 

    We finished yesterday better off with respect to all of our nearest rivals and no worse as compared to the bottom club. If that is repeated every game day from now until the end of the season I'd be satisfied. 

  3. 6 hours ago, Supercaleyman94 said:

    I think we can all agree though that Scott Gardiner is a absolute charlatan con man & a lot of the issues lie with him. 

    You can think all you like and to be fair critical thought is a novel concept that is not carried lightly in some quarters. 

    In my experience, both in a personal capacity in the context of a sme and more broadly, those that are hired and aren't able get moved on, mostly within two years. In extremis it's more like two months.

    Scot, that'll be just the one t, will shortly be presented with an award for five years of service so it appears that your view is indeed not universal. 

    It's true that there is a cohort on here, including deeply unserious Dundee contributors, that take a repetitive, some might say asinine position on this matter but that should never be confused with real world actualité

  4. Whilst appreciating the performative nature of these declarations of voting intention, there's a great danger of repeating the @Granny Danger level of ludicrous vote leave justifications.

    I say this in the firm knowledge that each vote not cast for the only show in town is a +1 impetus to the nasty party and an invitation to others to riff on their nonsense. 

     

  5. 1 hour ago, Sergeant Wilson said:

    He's being paid to comment on the game in front of him. Once he'd heard Hoilett had signed and was likely to play, a glance at Wikipedia would've stopped him sounding like an ill-informed buffoon.

    Eminent scientists funded by large hadron collider finances would struggle with such a mission. 

  6. 17 hours ago, ICTChris said:

    Polling analysis shows middle to upper income Scottish voters moving away from the SNP and toward Labour.

    https://archive.ph/wQ12F
     

    Think that should skip the paywall?

    The pay wall was indeed breached and thanks for sharing. I have to say though, such was the imbalance in the shallow article, all it served to do was remind me why I no longer purchase newspapers. 

  7. 5 hours ago, Zetterlund said:

     

    Some kind of poisonings obviously happened, but the novichok in underpants script is laughable. Firstly because we're told any contact with a tiny amount of the stuff would kill hundreds of people, but (nearly) everyone who touches it ends up fine. Then, in his pants, really? There are easier ways which are less fun in the news.

    Nothing makes sense about the official Salisbury story. The only thing I'm pretty confident of is that version didn't happen. The 2 shady Russians were probably up to no good, but there are so many gaping holes in the story that plenty of others have covered.

    Thanks for the reply. I'm genuinely interested in what your take on Salisbury is as I've heard nothing other than what was shared via mainstream media. Are you able to appraise and share an alternative take on the matter? 

×
×
  • Create New...