Jump to content

sophia

Gold Members
  • Posts

    5,907
  • Joined

Posts posted by sophia

  1. 7 minutes ago, sparky88 said:

    I don't know much  about this, as not a teacher and left school in 2005. Is disruption worse with phones than it was was before them?

    I'm told that there's been a marked improvement in attainment, especially in English and in spelling in particular. 

  2.  

    Tom English and his semi final report... 

     

    That was down the Rangers end and they let him have it. Not fury, but a lot of angst. A plaintive cry of the masses.

     

    Silva didn't score, though. In collapsing to the floor, Silva looked like an octopus falling out of a tree. Somewhere out there, Peter van Vossen was celebrating. No longer the holder of the greatest missed sitter award.

     

  3. 1 hour ago, alta-pete said:

    I have seen this phraseology used regularly but it seems rather clunky and full of subliminal meaning:

    The former first minister emerged from the home near Glasgow she shares with Peter Murrell”

    Why isn’t it her home? Their home? The marital home? But it’s described as the ‘home she shares? Surely all spouses share their home with their significant other? 

    The BBC have used it for the duration of this farrago and it has puzzled me on each hearing. 

    The obvious reading is that they are no longer biblical in their relationship but if that were to be so, why would such a powerful woman be hinging about in such an environment? 

    People have to know. 

  4. On 17/04/2024 at 21:22, scottsdad said:

    The tories supported it first time around, but not now as they a) haven't seen any benefits and b)are concerned that MUP exacerbates harms to the hardcore alcoholics (missing meals etc).

    I am no fan of the tories but here they are the only ones asking questions rather than just voting through this pointless measure.

    Never a good look with that or indeed being associated with the company that are positively engaging with you and your misunderstanding of the policy. 

  5. 11 minutes ago, scottsdad said:

    Voted through.

    Listened to the minister on the radio and she was awful.

     "Does this policy actually work?"

     " i met nursing students who were graduating last week, very excited to start work"

    I also listened to the interview and I thought she did well in expressing that the policy is part of a strategy that is supported by a wide range of objective experts.

    The only significant opposition is coming from the loud mouth and simplistic tories. 

  6. 11 hours ago, scottsdad said:

    PFI/PPP isn't privatisation.

    It is a form of contract where a private consortium will design, build and manage a building (school or hospital). The government pays no big capital costs up front but rather pays a fixed cost over, say, 25 years.

    Labour coming into power in the 90s saw that they needed a huge building programme, as the tories had run everything down. The capital cost to build everything that was needed was high, so they went down the PFI route. Hey presto, loads of shiny new buildings.

    The problems with PFI contracts arrived about 10 years later. They had signed so many, that by the late 2000s the taxpayer was paying huge sums to these contracts. Other issues came up also: there are various PFI types (BOO, BOOT, etc) and folk signing a contract in, say, 1999 weren't too fussed about what would happen 25 years later. So when the PFI contracts end, some buildings become government property, but others stay with private companies meaning new negotiations, or buying a now-oldish building.

    Also, there isn't much flexibility in them. A PFI school in Newcastle closed in 2010 or thereabouts due to lack of pupils, but the council must keep paying for the upkeep of an empty school. If changes to the building are needed (as will often happen) then this is hugely difficult and expensive. 

    In the UK we no longer use PFI but these are still very common for infrastructure projects (civil engineering and power plants) across the world.

    Facilities management is a scam of an industry serving idiot entities who have no appreciation of risk, whose middle managers have no incentive to do anything other than dole out contracts to chancer companies that have diversified from old rope. 

  7. 2 hours ago, PB1994 said:

    Big Dunc Ferguson producing the goods when it really matters. What a man.

    I agree and whilst some have been shrilling and wanting him ejected, that was typically premature.

    I've been endeavouring towards the objective with Duncan and I can accept that those brought up with the redolent cry of get it up the park might be fooled by the immediacy of that tactic but I rather think football has moved on and despite the frustration of this season, at least we have a philosophical sporting base to build upon. 

    Yet again the vocal and dreary doomsters are proved better at being performative than predicting and fifth is a finishing position that is eminently achievable. 

×
×
  • Create New...