Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/09/14 in all areas
-
In simple terms it means that you can bet 72p on Hearts and buy the naming rights for Ibrox with the profit.16 points
-
Working the 18th then only a half day on the 19th so no doubt i'll be up until all hours waiting for the result. If it's a Yes vote then i'll be spend the weekend lifting weights, running up hills and doing sit ups so i'm physically ready for the Russians attacking on the Monday.7 points
-
I hear that you have no vote, and on the 18th you plan to spend the day standing at the border, shaking your fist with an angry look on your face and mumbling, "independence I'll give you bloody independence"...5 points
-
Imagine The Rangers going bust and Scotland voting YES. It would be like Christmas and my birthday rolled into one.5 points
-
5 points
-
5 points
-
4 points
-
4 points
-
4 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
Came back to bite NDD on the arse. We didn't get relegated but NDD did. RIP.3 points
-
3 points
-
I've long compared this referendum to Motherwell getting into a Cup Final. My gut instinct is that good stuff doesn't happen for the wee team and it'll go tits up. Though I can't help but get excited that it just might happen, that we're in a position to make it happen, that maybe - just maybe - we'll get the result we need on the day... and what a glorious day that would be. Here's hoping that the metaphorical Stevie Kirk pops up in extra time to nod this home. Dare to dream.3 points
-
You're speaking to the 7th best poster in the history of Pie & Bovril. Show some respect.3 points
-
3 points
-
Some of these are great. You can make your own here....... http://giferator.easports.com/create/team2 points
-
This is a question I've asked the few people I know who are No voters, but haven't (by their own admission) received a reasonable response. I'm not having a go, I'm just genuinely interested in the answer. I'm going to lift my question almost word-for-word from a post I made the other day. I can fully understand that people are concerned, however rationally / irrationally you want to look at it, about finances after independence if the Yes movement wins - pensions, savings accounts, interest rates, welfare, etc.. I can fully understand that people believe finances in an independent Scotland will be a risk. My question is thus: what is it about an independent Scotland that you believe is more risky than staying in the union, which is currently one-and-a-half trillion pounds in debt (and this debt is rising by over a hundred billion pounds a year) and has a basket-case of a failed economy based largely on financial speculators and the London property market, and an upcoming pensions crisis caused by a refusal to admit that immigration is the solution? What is it about this financial situation the union is in that makes you believe your finances are safer than in an independent Scotland? As I've said, not having a go - I just haven't had a No voter give me a satisfactory (again, by their own admission) answer. Over to you.2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
You'll be one of the few folk who will be able to put their signature on the ballot without it being classed as a spoilt paper.2 points
-
As if the average knuckledragging Rangers fans could last five minutes without multi-packs of white sports socks and their unique range in Kappa tracksuit bottoms anyway.2 points
-
No. Like a bunch of men mainly in it for what they can get out personally irrespective of what happens to the club. Its serious deja vu time here. Things are happening at your club, yet its the fans of the other clubs asking questions and hypothesising whats going on that no-one knows about. All the while, the Rangers fans sit with their fingers in their ears going "la la la la" Baffling.2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
I'd rather get the Ebola virus than ever suffer the shame of going into a newsagents to buy a Record or Sun.2 points
-
2 points
-
What a car crash of a thread. I enjoyed Magee's absolute zinger earlier on though: 0 dots.2 points
-
I was a reluctant no for a while. Now I am a definite Yes. I'm also being payed to deliver yes leaflets next week, which is a bonus2 points
-
This is like Jihadi John apologising for using a blunt knife.2 points
-
2 points
-
I'd ban you purely for this attrocious "Bradford" patter.2 points
-
2 points
-
NDD was thick as pigshit and anyone who is trying to defend him is quite clearly as thick as pigshit. So many tears for such an awful poster.2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
On a more serious note. f**k them, they desrve everthing they get. Dignity my arse.2 points
-
2 points
-
Hi all, I was just having a read to see whether any Derby players were fancied to start the match and was intrigued by your left-back argument, and the fact no one had put forward our left-back Craig Forsyth. Now, I don't suppose many of you will know too much about him at left-back, other than he used to be a midfielder that was converted into left-back, or left wing-back, which is often the case. I don't expect you to take my word for it, but as a statistician, I like crunching the numbers of our performances post-match in order to compare and moan about what we should be doing better. Craig Forsyth, in terms of the numbers, is easily - and I mean easily - the most influential left back in the division, and since the turn of 2014, he has been one of our better players in what is a top 3 Championship side. Last season, he was statistically the best left-back in the division and comfortably finished in whoscored's TOTS, and the opening day of this season saw him make 131 touches, 20 more than the closest to him in the division (Scott Parker) - so you get that from him too. I don't know much about the other lads, but since there is a discussion I decided to sign up and offer some information on him. He has the potential to play in the Premier League regularly and if we had been promoted, I'm guessing he would have been first choice. He is also the best crosser of a ball I have seen too, much better than Commons (just an example). Although, I would warn that these crosses aren't consistent. Martin and Bryson are our best players, no Derby fan will argue with that, Martin really is an exceptional footballer, incredible technically and brings others into play - he doesn't move a lot though, he plays intelligently rather than chasing lost causes. Bryson is exceptionally fit and incredibly neat - if you play with a midfield three then he's a gem, if you play with two in the centre then you effectively kill everything that's good about his game. For what it's worth, Martin links up exceptionally with both Forsyth and Bryson. Forsyth often finds the feet of Martin from the left-back position, and then Martin often moves it into the path of Bryson to start our counter attacks. It's simple and effective. I'm not too surprised that Russell has been left out, he is a very good footballer but blows hot and cold. If he was consistent then I think he'd be worth a place in the squad/team, but until he can match the consistency of Forsyth, Bryson and Martin then he shouldn't be called up.2 points
-
2 points
-
Honest to f**k. I know I go on but are all Rangers fans absolute fucking idiots??? I mean surely surely surely they can see that a guy who's been playing in the lower leagues of Scotland for the past 3 seasons and has looked pretty average in the SCOTTISH CHAMPIONSHIP should not be playing against the fucking World Champions of football? Come on tae f**k QOTS one week to Thomas Muller the next are they fucking stupid??? Genuinely canna even be arsed, what did Scotland do to deserve these muppets? Apologies to any sane Rangers fan reading this. (If they exist)2 points
-
2 points