QUOTE (SavotheGreat @ Nov 10 2008, 08:40)

Yeah but they will still pedal the same old tired points. When the team wins it is all to do with the players. When they lose it has everything to do with the manager. The classic case of a support waging a vendetta against their manager; not too unlike Morton, IMHO (not a dig at Morton).
There is a blame culture in football and more often than not, and often incorrectly, the manager is first on the list of targets. There could be ANY number of reasons why it is not working out. IMO, and this reflects historical fact, success is easier to achieve when supporters are willing to give the manager TIME and SPACE to adjust, to settle and to build up a squad. I do not define time as a mere few months but at least a year. Stark, Clark, Connolly, Coyle and Sturrock, all were given over a year (almost in Connolly's case) and significantly longer in most cases. Three witnessed SPL duty, one took us on two phenomenal cup runs and the other was a wash out.
Alex Ferguson, Rafa Benitez, Arsene Wenger. All have gone through seasons where they have witnessed their teams playing testimony to what it's like to be a lump of shite. But all have achieved success at their club in the long run. These days however it seems like clubs believe the best way to acheive success is by shipping them in and shipping them out - enjoy the momentary boost a new guy brings to the squad and then six months down the line, when he experiences a bad run of form, chuck him. Newcastle and Tottenham are prime examples of big clubs that have failed to fulfill their potential in recent years - both are wheelers and dealers in the managerial transfer market.
When you take on a manager you have to be thinking in terms of years, not months. If you are going to set yourself aside from the competition then you need to be prepared to stick by him and the the team through the bad spells. You can't just cry slaughter whenever you experience a 4-0 humping at the hands of Partick Thistle.
I more or less agree 100% Savo. I doubt many saints fans were overjoyed when either coyle or mcinnes were appointed, but both got time and both (are looking like) being successes. The only time i dont think time will be given is when whats delivered is miles below what is expected e.g. the threat of relegation under Connolly......espically when that manager has brought in over 20 of his own players!
One thing i would argue though is that Stark got too much time, it was clear way before he left we weren't heading anywhere under him. And would add him to the "washout" pile!
In general though, you can really assess a manger too much first season, espcially when he doesn't have his own players in. Once he has his own team, however, if the players arent performing you start to look at the manager.