Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Bigotry Getting Worse On Here........
The Pie Shop > SPL and SFL Football > Rangers v Celtic, Celtic v Rangers
The Hun's Ghost
I have just had a good read at some of the threads displayed on here for the first time in a while and I have to admit that quite a few comments and arguments are embarrassing and it is no wonder that some supporters from the provincial clubs keep posting their FTOF thread.

The same bigoted arguments over and over is discussed with humour only fit for an imbecile.

Look at what you write and think to yourself.

If you are religious and following the catholic or protestant faith then you should know you are all Christians together. If you are not religious then why even give time to the religious comments at all unless of course, you are mocking the idiots trying to divide each other by faith!

Football wise, a number of my fellow Rangers supporters are embarrassing with this silly song about a famine where people died.

Plus we have the usual suspects on the green and white side bleating about the pride of terrorism.

It really is embarrassing and how some of you can then switch off your computer and go and step out your door while pretending your credible people is beyond me!

Is it not time that the adults who post on here lead by example instead of carrying on like schoolboys!

Some of you especially should read your posts back to yourself and then ask if your proud of your comments and if your children would be proud of you.

To me, some of those comments are fuckin` terrible and would never be made to people face to face. Maybe that`s the point....you can say whatever you like on here and think your exonerated. Whatever the reason, without naming names, some of you should be ashamed! . sad.gif
Proteus Maximus
The famine song is totally inoffensive and a mere piss take.

The SPL can't act on it and neither can the police.
Pink Freud
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 09:40) *
The famine song is totally inoffensive and a mere piss take.

The SPL can't act on it and neither can the police.


That really isn't for you to say. Bernard Manning denied to the day he died that he was a rascist. wink.gif
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (Pink Freud @ Sep 26 2008, 09:42) *
That really isn't for you to say. Bernard Manning denied to the day he died that he was a rascist. wink.gif


I think your opinion only counts if you can spell simple words.

Bernard Manning wasn't a "rascist", since there is no such term.

You are a fool, so you should cease further comment, or else I will publicly dismantle your "points" with my customary ease.
SmellTheGlove
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 09:47) *
I think your opinion only counts if you can spell simple words.

Bernard Manning wasn't a "rascist", since there is no such term.

You are a fool, so you should cease further comment, or else I will publicly dismantle your "points" with my customary ease.



http://www.pieandbovril.com/forum/index.ph...p;#entry2775154

Post no 52.

It seems you can't spell simple words. respnse. laugh.gif

Good job everyone on here knows you are a fool. A boring and sad one at that.

I await your respnse with great excitement. rolleyes.gif laugh.gif
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (SmellTheGlove @ Sep 26 2008, 10:42) *
http://www.pieandbovril.com/forum/index.ph...p;#entry2775154

Post no 52.

It seems you can't spell simple words. respnse. laugh.gif

Good job everyone on here knows you are a fool. A boring and sad one at that.

I await your respnse with great excitement. rolleyes.gif laugh.gif


There's a difference between a typo and a spelling error, you cretinous retard.

I'm surprised you can turn a computer on with such a low IQ.

Fool!
SmellTheGlove
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 10:56) *
There's a difference between a typo and a spelling error, you cretinous retard.

I'm surprised you can turn a computer on with such a low IQ.

Fool!



Pink Freuds was also obviously a typo you braindead hypocrite.

Just the respnse I expected from a lowlife clown like you.
rfcgav
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 10:56) *
There's a difference between a typo and a spelling error, you cretinous retard.

I'm surprised you can turn a computer on with such a low IQ.

Fool!


laugh.gif
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (SmellTheGlove @ Sep 26 2008, 11:56) *
Pink Freuds was also obviously a typo you braindead hypocrite.

Just the respnse I expected from a lowlife clown like you.



If it transpired that your IQ was exactly half that of myself, then I'd currently be under-rating you by a factor of six.
SmellTheGlove
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 12:12) *
If it transpired that your IQ was exactly half that of myself, then I'd currently be under-rating you by a factor of six.



Suprised you have the time to take an IQ test given your unhealthy obsession with the Scottish champions. biggrin.gif
sev
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 09:47) *
I think your opinion only counts if you can spell simple words.

Bernard Manning wasn't a "rascist", since there is no such term.

You are a fool, so you should cease further comment, or else I will publicly dismantle your "points" with my customary ease.



You had no comeback so you had to get personal. Pathetic
Cardinal Richelieu
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 12:12) *
If it transpired that your IQ was exactly half that of myself, then I'd currently be under-rating you by a factor of six.


People in glass houses....

Despite the fact that the sentence above is difficult to understand without reading it several times (and it really doesn't merit that), you should not use the word "myself" as the object of a sentence, unless you had already mentioned yourself earlier in the sentence.

The correct sentence would be:

"If it transpired that your IQ was exactly half that of my own, then I'd currently be under-rating you by a factor of six".


However, I'm afraid it still doesn't make much sense.


QUOTE
You are a fool, so you should cease further comment, or else I will publicly dismantle your "points" with my customary ease.


laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (Cardinal Richelieu @ Sep 26 2008, 13:02) *
People in glass houses....

Despite the fact that the sentence above is difficult to understand without reading it several times (and it really doesn't merit that), you should not use the word "myself" as the object of a sentence, unless you had already mentioned yourself earlier in the sentence.

The correct sentence would be:

"If it transpired that your IQ was exactly half that of my own, then I'd currently be under-rating you by a factor of six".


However, I'm afraid it still doesn't make much sense.




laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

No. The original wording was correct. Your "improved version" denotes a comparison of "the IQ of my IQ"! rolleyes.gif

Your inability to comprehend the original sentence doesn't entail a flaw in the wording- quite the contrary!

laugh.gif
Cardinal Richelieu
Well that's your fault for not making your original sentence clearer.

laugh.gif
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (Cardinal Richelieu @ Sep 26 2008, 13:16) *
Well that's your fault for not making your original sentence clearer.

laugh.gif



I'm in no way responsible for the limitations of either your cerebral faculties or your education.
Centre Stand Hero
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 13:22) *
I'm in no way responsible for the limitations of either your cerebral faculties or your education.


f**k off you boring hun p***k. Get your cerebral faculties round that.
fitbin
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 09:47) *
Bernard Manning wasn't a "rascist", since there is no such term


From the guy who claims "Hun" is Sectarian?

Stop showing yourself up, son wink.gif

QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 10:56) *
There's a difference between a typo and a spelling error, you cretinous retard.


laugh.gif
LordHawHaw
QUOTE (Centre Stand Hero @ Sep 26 2008, 13:28) *
f**k off you boring hun p***k. Get your cerebral faculties round that.



Succinct and to the point smile.gif
The Hun's Ghost
As the original poster I have to mention the following 17 posts have clearly illustrated my point.

Ask yourself, what are you really arguing about! sad.gif
fitbin
QUOTE (The Hun's Ghost @ Sep 26 2008, 13:42) *
As the original poster I have to mention the following 17 posts have clearly illustrated my point.

Ask yourself, what are you really arguing about! sad.gif


You were funnier as "Angela" wink.gif
The Hun's Ghost
QUOTE (My Garden Shed @ Sep 26 2008, 13:46) *
You were funnier as "Angela" wink.gif


smile.gif

I think we all know who I was before and it certainly wasn't Angela although I do admire for having the guts to stand up against the bigotry.

What makes me laugh is most of you wouldn`t say boo to each other if you were face to face!

Arguing about issues is all very well if you have a common goal for the good but point scoring is a bit weak!

Personally, I think sectarianism is getting worse again between Old Firm supporters which is a shame considering the efforts being made to teach children the ills involved with this type of feeling! sad.gif
S. Carter
QUOTE (Centre Stand Hero @ Sep 26 2008, 13:28) *
f**k off you boring hun p***k. Get your cerebral faculties round that.



Let me say that
smile.gif

Fuck off you boring Hun prick. Get your cerebral faculties round that.

I quite agree
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (My Garden Shed @ Sep 26 2008, 13:32) *
From the guy who claims "Hun" is Sectarian?

Stop showing yourself up, son wink.gif



laugh.gif



You prove you are a sectarian bigot with every word.

Resorting to insults merely proves your inability to even challenge me in debate.
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (The Hun's Ghost @ Sep 26 2008, 14:04) *
smile.gif

I think we all know who I was before and it certainly wasn't Angela although I do admire for having the guts to stand up against the bigotry.

What makes me laugh is most of you wouldn`t say boo to each other if you were face to face!

Arguing about issues is all very well if you have a common goal for the good but point scoring is a bit weak!

Personally, I think sectarianism is getting worse again between Old Firm supporters which is a shame considering the efforts being made to teach children the ills involved with this type of feeling! sad.gif

I actually think you're right and I'll tell you why and who is to blame.

Sectarianism was dying out and people were moving on. However, when Martin O'Neill, a notoriously bad loser and purveyor of frenzied trackside antics, took over at Celtic, he introduced a sectarian anti-Protestant agenda in which every word of the Rangers fan related not just to the relevant context of an Old Firm match, but whatever misperceived delusional social problem that O'Neill deemed fit to be attached to it.

When Celtic lost to Rangers, it wasn't a football match with terracing banter, it was part of some delusional anti-Catholic conspiracy theory in which referees helped "the proddies". His autobiography highlighted this bitterness in him from an early age. Being a bigot, O'Neill was blind to this. He made bizarre, illiterate accusations or racism. He stoked up the hatred and even said this at UEFA press conference when they were beaten by Barcelona.

At the same time, the Celtic fans were using the internet to try to improve their image after the scandal of their actions against Mark Walters, Hugh Dallas and Fergus McCann's failed "cleaning up" of the Parkhead song sheet. O'Neill's words gave them fresh impetus.

Graham Spiers, also at this time, had fallen out with Murray because he lost out on a few signing scoops and went into a huff, attacking Murray rather than his previous lauding of him. He befriended O'Neill and through his own pettiness and bitterness, he gave O'Neill's bigoted sectarian agenda, despite contradicting his own earlier words on the subject of offensive chanting at Old Firm games.

Now exposed as a hypocrite, Spiers lost all his early credibility and had to pander to his remaining sole constituency of the Celtic minded bigot and also befriended UEFA match delegate, Gerhard Kapl, ironically known as the "Pope of Rules" who thought it was him being derided in song.

This aggregate of demented fools, childish minds and sectarian bigots have peddled an agenda that says if you sing words which can be interpreted in any way or even distorted as sectarian in any context, regardless of that very context, then you are an anti-Catholic bigot.

Throughout all this, Celtic fans continued to sing anti-British, racist by their own standards, and sectarian songs. More sinisterly, the IRA stuff continued and still does, but now Rangers fans have noticed it and realised that the playing field isn't level, so they must now counter and perhpas mirror that strategy.
Fizzy Gillespie
Postius Bollocksus

SmellTheGlove
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 14:58) *
I actually think you're right and I'll tell you why and who is to blame.

Sectarianism was dying out and people were moving on. However, when Martin O'Neill, a notoriously bad loser and purveyor of frenzied trackside antics, took over at Celtic, he introduced a sectarian anti-Protestant agenda in which every word of the Rangers fan related not just to the relevant context of an Old Firm match, but whatever misperceived delusional social problem that O'Neill deemed fit to be attached to it.

When Celtic lost to Rangers, it wasn't a football match with terracing banter, it was part of some delusional anti-Catholic conspiracy theory in which referees helped "the proddies". His autobiography highlighted this bitterness in him from an early age. Being a bigot, O'Neill was blind to this. He made bizarre, illiterate accusations or racism. He stoked up the hatred and even said this at UEFA press conference when they were beaten by Barcelona.

At the same time, the Celtic fans were using the internet to try to improve their image after the scandal of their actions against Mark Walters, Hugh Dallas and Fergus McCann's failed "cleaning up" of the Parkhead song sheet. O'Neill's words gave them fresh impetus.

Graham Spiers, also at this time, had fallen out with Murray because he lost out on a few signing scoops and went into a huff, attacking Murray rather than his previous lauding of him. He befriended O'Neill and through his own pettiness and bitterness, he gave O'Neill's bigoted sectarian agenda, despite contradicting his own earlier words on the subject of offensive chanting at Old Firm games.

Now exposed as a hypocrite, Spiers lost all his early credibility and had to pander to his remaining sole constituency of the Celtic minded bigot and also befriended UEFA match delegate, Gerhard Kapl, ironically known as the "Pope of Rules" who thought it was him being derided in song.

This aggregate of demented fools, childish minds and sectarian bigots have peddled an agenda that says if you sing words which can be interpreted in any way or even distorted as sectarian in any context, regardless of that very context, then you are an anti-Catholic bigot.

Throughout all this, Celtic fans continued to sing anti-British, racist by their own standards, and sectarian songs. More sinisterly, the IRA stuff continued and still does, but now Rangers fans have noticed it and realised that the playing field isn't level, so they must now counter and perhpas mirror that strategy.



The sad thing is this poor chap actually believes this. sad.gif

Another spelling error from maximus. ohmy.gif

Not a good week for a man of you're fabricated intellect. Can't even spell response or perhaps. laugh.gif

What was it you said to Pink Freud for not being able to spell racist? rolleyes.gif
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (SmellTheGlove @ Sep 26 2008, 15:19) *
The sad thing is this poor chap actually believes this. sad.gif

Another spelling error from maximus. ohmy.gif

Not a good week for a man of you're fabricated intellect. Can't even spell response or perhaps. laugh.gif

What was it you said to Pink Freud for not being able to spell racist? rolleyes.gif


rolleyes.gif

I rest my case.
SmellTheGlove
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 15:32) *
rolleyes.gif

I rest my case.



What your case? You like to ridicule people for not being able to spell the simplest of words yet you don't even have the brain capacity to spell perhaps or response.

What a plonker. laugh.gif
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (SmellTheGlove @ Sep 26 2008, 15:42) *
What your case? You like to ridicule people for not being able to spell the simplest of words yet you don't even have the brain capacity to spell perhaps or response.

What a plonker. laugh.gif


Do you always make an arse of yourself in the presence of others, or do you do it on your own too?
SmellTheGlove
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 15:51) *
Do you always make an arse of yourself in the presence of others, or do you do it on your own two?



Do you often sidestep question you are asked or maybe it was to difficult for you to understand?

Perhps you would like to give me a respnse. laugh.gif laugh.gif
Beyemystic
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 14:58) *
I actually think you're right and I'll tell you why and who is to blame.

Sectarianism was dying out and people were moving on. However, when Martin O'Neill, a notoriously bad loser and purveyor of frenzied trackside antics, took over at Celtic, he introduced a sectarian anti-Protestant agenda in which every word of the Rangers fan related not just to the relevant context of an Old Firm match, but whatever misperceived delusional social problem that O'Neill deemed fit to be attached to it.

When Celtic lost to Rangers, it wasn't a football match with terracing banter, it was part of some delusional anti-Catholic conspiracy theory in which referees helped "the proddies". His autobiography highlighted this bitterness in him from an early age. Being a bigot, O'Neill was blind to this. He made bizarre, illiterate accusations or racism. He stoked up the hatred and even said this at UEFA press conference when they were beaten by Barcelona.

At the same time, the Celtic fans were using the internet to try to improve their image after the scandal of their actions against Mark Walters, Hugh Dallas and Fergus McCann's failed "cleaning up" of the Parkhead song sheet. O'Neill's words gave them fresh impetus.

Graham Spiers, also at this time, had fallen out with Murray because he lost out on a few signing scoops and went into a huff, attacking Murray rather than his previous lauding of him. He befriended O'Neill and through his own pettiness and bitterness, he gave O'Neill's bigoted sectarian agenda, despite contradicting his own earlier words on the subject of offensive chanting at Old Firm games.

Now exposed as a hypocrite, Spiers lost all his early credibility and had to pander to his remaining sole constituency of the Celtic minded bigot and also befriended UEFA match delegate, Gerhard Kapl, ironically known as the "Pope of Rules" who thought it was him being derided in song.

This aggregate of demented fools, childish minds and sectarian bigots have peddled an agenda that says if you sing words which can be interpreted in any way or even distorted as sectarian in any context, regardless of that very context, then you are an anti-Catholic bigot.

Throughout all this, Celtic fans continued to sing anti-British, racist by their own standards, and sectarian songs. More sinisterly, the IRA stuff continued and still does, but now Rangers fans have noticed it and realised that the playing field isn't level, so they must now counter and perhpas mirror that strategy.


laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

Read all this in Martin O'Neill's (non-existent) autobiography have you?
Steve1954
QUOTE (The Hun's Ghost @ Sep 26 2008, 08:18) *
I have just had a good read at some of the threads displayed on here for the first time in a while and I have to admit that quite a few comments and arguments are embarrassing and it is no wonder that some supporters from the provincial clubs keep posting their FTOF thread.

The same bigoted arguments over and over is discussed with humour only fit for an imbecile.

Look at what you write and think to yourself.

If you are religious and following the catholic or protestant faith then you should know you are all Christians together. If you are not religious then why even give time to the religious comments at all unless of course, you are mocking the idiots trying to divide each other by faith!

Football wise, a number of my fellow Rangers supporters are embarrassing with this silly song about a famine where people died.

Plus we have the usual suspects on the green and white side bleating about the pride of terrorism.

It really is embarrassing and how some of you can then switch off your computer and go and step out your door while pretending your credible people is beyond me!

Is it not time that the adults who post on here lead by example instead of carrying on like schoolboys!

Some of you especially should read your posts back to yourself and then ask if your proud of your comments and if your children would be proud of you.

To me, some of those comments are fuckin` terrible and would never be made to people face to face. Maybe that`s the point....you can say whatever you like on here and think your exonerated. Whatever the reason, without naming names, some of you should be ashamed! . sad.gif



1OO% CORRECT,,,,, I only read above, as I am sure some halfwits will be starting thier shite

3 posts in . ENJOY THE GAME , and the banter, but dont cross the line!
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (SmellTheGlove @ Sep 26 2008, 16:07) *
Do you often sidestep question you are asked or maybe it was to difficult for you to understand?

Perhps you would like to give me a respnse.


What a tit! Your spelling is atrocious.
Centre Stand Hero
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 17:30) *
What a tit! Your spelling is atrocious.


What a tit, you're respnses are atrocious.
fitbin
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 15:51) *
Do you always make an arse of yourself in the presence of others, or do you do it on your own two?


rolleyes.gif
Proteus Maximus
QUOTE (My Garden Shed @ Sep 26 2008, 18:20) *
rolleyes.gif



Retrospective editing doesn't make you cool.
Eönwë
What I'd like to know is: just how exactly did Martin O'Neill make racism? unsure.gif
Fizzy Gillespie
QUOTE (Eärendil @ Sep 27 2008, 10:15) *
What I'd like to know is: just how exactly did Martin O'Neill make racism? unsure.gif


Recipe

1. Take a pinch of white man
2. Wrap him up in black skin
3. Add a touch of blue blood
4. And a little bitty bit of red indian boy
5. Oh like a curly latin kinkies
6. Oh lordy, lordy, mixed with yellow chinkees
SmellTheGlove
QUOTE (Centre Stand Hero @ Sep 26 2008, 17:58) *
What a tit, you're respnses are atrocious.



His respnses get worse with each passing thread. Pehaps he could think of some new patter?

laugh.gif rolleyes.gif
Steve1954
You people need to take a powder,, you lot are not right sad.gif sad.gif sad.gif


sad human beings sad.gif sad.gif may your god help you f.f.s.
The Hun's Ghost
QUOTE (Steve1954 @ Sep 28 2008, 21:09) *
You people need to take a powder,, you lot are not right sad.gif sad.gif sad.gif


sad human beings sad.gif sad.gif may your god help you f.f.s.


You make a good point Steve.

Unfortunately, we live today in a society where the bigot seeks easy targets and is encouraged with sympathy from fellow hypocrites.

Thankfully some of the usual suspects on here are not part of the significant demographics in society for even though they like to lash their sectarian tongue with venom on here, the majority of them will rarely be heard outside their own front door.

They are but mouth pieces on the web lacking in courage to bring us their ills face to face!

What I find very disappointing is that the great name of Glasgow Rangers Football Club get`s caught up in these dregs who through jealousy of our success, try to condemn the club at every turn. The club is not responsible for the bigots actions and the club should be exonerated for they have already asked our own fans to represent Rangers properly.

If however our fans are goaded and drawn into a debate by the sectarian element of other clubs fans, I would rather they turned the other cheek and showed they were bigger than those deliberately antagonising them.

We are Rangers, we should never forget we are above those who look to bring us down.
Millfield Marksman
QUOTE (The Hun's Ghost @ Sep 29 2008, 13:32) *
I would rather they turned the other cheek and showed they were bigger than those deliberately antagonising them.

That would indeed be the classy thing to do. It will, therefore, be impossible for the hard-nosed bigots amongst your support to manage

QUOTE
We are Rangers, we should never forget we are above those who look to bring us down.

The Rangers fans' repuation is decided solely by Rangers fans' behaviour. You know it, I know it, we all know it.
rocksie67
QUOTE (The Hun's Ghost @ Sep 29 2008, 13:32) *
You make a good point Steve.

Unfortunately, we live today in a society where the bigot seeks easy targets and is encouraged with sympathy from fellow hypocrites.

Thankfully some of the usual suspects on here are not part of the significant demographics in society for even though they like to lash their sectarian tongue with venom on here, the majority of them will rarely be heard outside their own front door.

They are but mouth pieces on the web lacking in courage to bring us their ills face to face!

What I find very disappointing is that the great name of Glasgow Rangers Football Club get`s caught up in these dregs who through jealousy of our success, try to condemn the club at every turn. The club is not responsible for the bigots actions and the club should be exonerated for they have already asked our own fans to represent Rangers properly.

If however our fans are goaded and drawn into a debate by the sectarian element of other clubs fans, I would rather they turned the other cheek and showed they were bigger than those deliberately antagonising them.

We are Rangers, we should never forget we are above those who look to bring us down.



The Dignity tongue.gif
WeAreThePeople
QUOTE (Centre Stand Hero @ Sep 26 2008, 17:58) *
What a tit, you're respnses are atrocious.


You got yourself into it as well, I like to just ignore him the most of the time

"oh you miss-hit a key and hence miss-spelled a word, I must try to make fun of you and hope it makes me look big ON THE INTERNET"

Got to laugh at him at times, although some of his stuff is true (but with the amount he puts on here, some of it has to be true I guess. laugh.gif
The Dog
QUOTE (Proteus Maximus @ Sep 26 2008, 09:40) *
The famine song is totally inoffensive and a mere piss take.

The SPL can't act on it and neither can the police.


If it's a piss take to the "Plastic Paddies at Parkhead" then why do you sing it at every ground?
WeAreThePeople
QUOTE (The Dog @ Sep 29 2008, 22:32) *
If it's a piss take to the "Plastic Paddies at Parkhead" then why do you sing it at every ground?


To show our defiance against your mob and getting it stopped.
The Dog
QUOTE (WeAreThePeople @ Sep 29 2008, 23:01) *
To show our defiance against your mob and getting it stopped.


No it's not, you've been at it long before any complaint was made.


This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.