QUOTE (cmontheloknow @ Jul 16 2008, 17:28)

There are arguments against summer football (not necessarily mine but ones I've heard nonetheless).
1. Players on holiday for key games
2. Committee on holiday for games would mean some clubs really struggling to put the match on
3. A bone dry pitch is almost unplayable and dangerous as a frozen one - most Junior pitches are very badly maintained so we can't really compare with what we see on TV in the close season
4. The bowling season would clash even more than it does already - this affects committee and supporters rather than players!
5. Unpredictable climate - what would the ideal summer football season be?
6. If the season ended in November and there was a backlog of games to be fitted in, how would that work?
7. The current competitive season runs from early August to early June (10 months) for the most successful clubs, and that includes probably, for the most successful clubs, maybe 10 midweek dates. Going back to point 6, with a pre-season to accommodate as well (4 weeks on top of the 10 months), we'd still have to play in either December or January!
Just a few to get started!
On the last point, I looked at games played in the West Region the past 5 years and it was pretty clear that the least amount of football was played in December and January.
From a supporter of Summer Football
1. Too bad. The current situation isnt great for players either. For one thing check out their wedding anniversaries - mostly late May/ early June. Ever wondered why? They would just have to adjust. Lots of bargains to be had for hols in Spain in November and January you know. And its not like holidays are as inflexible as they once were - Glasgow used to empty during the Glasgow Fair fortnight, once upon a time. Not any more.
2. See above
3. Not so sure about that - you wont slip on a bone dry pitch for one thing (and might they be watered?). Also, if the global warming boys are right, its not the frozen pitch, but the one that's either under a foot of water or covered in mud, leading to postponements (one of the reasons given for no fixture list - also see 6). More likely in the winter.
4. Come on, the bowling is on from before the current season ends and when the season starts up - not counting pre-season work. If you include pre-season, we had our last game about the end of May and have a friendly this Saturday - so about 6/7 weeks off. Then there's signing players, renegotiating contracts, pre-seasons training all during that 6/7 weeks. Bit like the Windmill Theatre - "we never close"
5. Not as bad as during the winter. I must admit the enjoyment from football kind of passes me by when I am standing watching a match with the rain being driven into my face by a high wind in a temperature high of about 4 degrees C. Cant be great for the players either
6. Fewer games would be postponed in my opinion - pitches wouldnt get the **** kicked out them with being played on when, for instance, its too wet.
7. That's repackaging my point 4 - in a lot of ways the season (not necessarily "playing") is about 12 months just now as it is. But, if fewer games were postponed then the season should finish on time.
My last point would be that if the senior game carries on at its traditional time, there might be fans of senior clubs who would come along to Junior games, just because there wasnt anything else. I think it was about the middle of May that there was a thread on one of the SFL forums here, titled "I'm bored already".