QUOTE (ConanTheLibrarian @ Jun 12 2008, 17:31)

Last season,after Christmas,we had 2 main strikers plus Stewart to replace one of them after 60 mins and John O'Niell as a back up for a midfielder or forward.Now we've lost those 2 and only have Kean so surely we need at least one more striker.We're going to have a minimum of 2 extra games at the start of the season so we need as big a squad as is financially possible.Adding strikers in my opinion is a neccessity,not a sign that Dobbie is leaving.
I'm going to have to disagree with you I'm afraid.
In Dobbie and O'Connor we do have one of, if not the best strike partnership at this level, as the OP mentioned. Only a forward in very specific circumstances would want to join us knowing that without even getting a chance to impress he is going to be third choice right away. Due to this I was extremely surprised when we signed Kean because he does have a decent reputation at this level, and I'm sure had other options. Obviously he will be pushing for a start but at the moment he is third choice. This would leave any further signing fourth choice. Who is going to want to join knowing that, other than perhaps a young SPL loanee?
I am also a bit concerned by the part you have highlighted in bold. You think we need at least one more striker. That takes our total number of strikers to 4, but suggests you think we need more than that! IMO with a squad of 20 players that is more than excessive.
You also state that signing more strikers is a neccessity. At present we have 3 very capable strikers, at this level, signed up, and no goalkeepers. I think my take on the word neccessity is slightly different to yours!
Unfortunately I would tend to agree with the OP that if we were to sign another established striker it would suggest Dobbs is on the way out rather than us building a super-dooper strikerforce that is going to win us the league. It's only paper talk at the moment, and at least we can console ourselves knowing we will at least get a fee should he leave.