QUOTE (seamus @ Sep 16 2008, 23:07)

If John Reid wanted to increase his popularity among the clubs support he should ban the Huns from Celtic Park and declare his intention to stop any future joint sponsorship deals.
I thought after Manchester it was the time to do it but the public image of a Hun just gets worse.
There has never been a better time to do it until their next shameful act.
Very true - good point.
I don't understand why they don't make all Old Firm games "home supporters only" - it'd save a fortune in Polis costs, you could get a load more punters through the gates (given the empty seats needed to "segregate" fans) etc.
I can understand why advertisers are keep for joint sponsorship deals (to avoid alienating one half of the OF - e.g. I'm sure few Celtic fans were drinking McEwans in the 1990s, and not just 'cos it tasted pish!). However, if either club wants to disassociate themselves from the other (and I can understand why Celtic would want to ditch the "guilt by association" right now), then the joint sponsorship deals and collusion over 5% tickets surcharges should stop.
QUOTE (WeAreThePeople @ Sep 16 2008, 23:40)

The same goes for songs glorifying the IRA, which are sectarian,
The IRA weren't sectarian, they were happy to murder people of any (and no) religion - indescriminate bombs like in Omagh killed people of all faiths - to pretend that they were defending Catholicism whilst killing Catholics?
QUOTE (LordHawHaw @ Sep 17 2008, 09:50)

I don't think the IRA is banned....lots of Celtic songs refer to the IRA, some being people that formed part of the free state government. You'd ban all referenves to the IRA?
I hear that argument a lot - that the songs are referring to the guys of the Irish Free State and all that, rather than the murdering terrorist scumbags? In which case, can someone explain whether it's the fledgling politicians/ rebels of the 1920s or the Provos who it's hoped will kill Nacho Novo in his sleep?