QUOTE (Nizzy @ Dec 16 2007, 18:11)

You've got the laugh at some of the contents of that report. First of all, it was Buchanan that rounded the keeper, not Chaplain. Secondly, the writer appears to suggest that Tuffey moved off his line before the penalty had been struck - no mention of a slip there. Thirdly, this gem of a quote: "whether this was a point gained or 2 points lost can be argued." If by "two points lost" he means the penalty miss then fair enough, but if he doesn't I don't see where any argument can arise. Definitely a point gained in Dunfermline's case.
The guy who writes the match report often relies on the live text commentary. This week it happened to be me that was doing it, so the error in identifying the correct player was mine. However, it was harder at this game than most, mainly because Partick had a number of smallish dark haired players in their team, and the numbers they use are quite difficult to see much of the time, being white on yellow. If you look at that, you may well find some other errors, but as I say, I was finding it harder this week than I usually do. People moaning about misidentification of players in match reports is actually something that annoys me now.
QUOTE (partickfan @ Dec 16 2007, 21:34)

he does have a point though: will you bring 3000 to Firhill for the cup game?
No. But then Partick didn't bring 3000 last season, so I fail to see what point is being made. Also note that last season was for a quarter final, and I think you'll find that the away support at the 2004 quarter final was much the same as it was last year.
QUOTE (SmoothPar @ Dec 17 2007, 10:33)

It's very easy to say Thistle had a great support last season at East End in the cup and compare it Dunfermline's on Saturday but I could also then thrown in the 5,000 (plus the few hundred locked out) that went to Tannadice two seasons ago on the second last day of the season to see us effectively survive relegation.
Lets not be daft here, it was about 3000 that day, as that side of the ground doesn't hold much more than that.
Anyway, having got that out of the way...
Very lucky to get a point on Saturday. I thought Partick played quite well and as others have said, it was only some great saves by Gallacher that gave us a chance to get a draw. The one from the header in the first half was a genuinely good save. Again we played a team and were dominated in midfield, something that surely has to be the first thing the new manager addresses. Not really much more to add to what's been said above, except to say that I can't really be too upset with a a point given how the game went.
I'm one of the few who thought the penalty was correct. While the keeper went in, I also thought that one of the defenders, probably Archibald, got in and possibly caught Burchill as he went looked like he was just about to tap in the rebound. That was certainly my first thought, and it wasn't until 5 minutes later when someone mentioned that it was Tuffey who had been penalised that I even considerred that. It did happen quite quickly though, so it'll be interesting to see the highlights on the Partick website. My perception though was certainly that Burchill was just about to tap in from about 4 yards and was stopped from doing so.