roman_bairn Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Why would there be a vandetta against Shiels? Because he dared to be mocked and the ref heard it? Falkirk fans understand that Shiels didn't decide the punishment right? And that he didn't cite the players? If the Ref heard it, why did he not send Ohara off at the time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believe The Hype Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Fucking west coast bias strikes again against Falkirk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parslad Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 13 minutes ago, Bairnardo said: This reeks of the well known anti-Falkirk conspiracy. We absolutely have to get something organised like a boycott of the Jan 2nd game. We have to make our voice heard. I have started to knock up a statement whixh I intend to release on COYB facebook. Any contributions welcome and il need a proof reader Fuckin brilliant levels of old firm paranoia. At least you're taking it well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Sticks and stones won’t break my bones, but words will always hurt me.Dunfermline’s new club motto.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 1 minute ago, roman_bairn said: Sticks and stones won’t break my bones, but words will always hurt me. Dunfermline’s new club motto.... What's the old motto? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbornbairn Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, DA Baracus said: What's the old motto? You're not getting what we owe you so f**k off In Latin obv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyBlueArmy1876 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Sheils does deserve abuse for his ridiculous tackle on McKee though. Both for the nature of it and for being the first opposition player ever to unsuccessfully injure him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyBlueArmy1876 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 This feels like 2003 all over again. #justiceforffc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ka202 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Fuckin brilliant levels of old firm paranoia. At least you're taking it well. massive whoosh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poet of the Macabre Posted November 9, 2017 Author Share Posted November 9, 2017 Unsure why Falkirk fans think continuing to mock Shiels' missing eye is funny or useful? I'd be trying to forget the whole thing happened if one of our players stooped so low. The idea that the lenient 8-game ban will make people angry at Shiels makes about as much sense as Celtic fans booing Shay Logan for being racially abused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, Poet of the Macabre said: Unsure why Falkirk fans think continuing to mock Shiels' missing eye is funny or useful? I'd be trying to forget the whole thing happened if one of our players stooped so low. Whenever you're unsure of Falkirk fans behaviour, just remember it's Falkirk fans. That should explain everything pretty well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Unsure why Falkirk fans think continuing to mock Shiels' missing eye is funny or useful? I'd be trying to forget the whole thing happened if one of our players stooped so low. The idea that the lenient 8-game ban will make people angry at Shiels makes about as much sense as Celtic fans booing Shay Logan for being racially abused. Maybe they should give him a 50 game ban on appeal and we should just accept it too?I agree with a ban but the levels of crazed political correctness being delivered here is totally baffling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Condemning slagging someone based on disability is crazed political correctness now. This is genuinely OF level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poet of the Macabre Posted November 9, 2017 Author Share Posted November 9, 2017 6 minutes ago, roman_bairn said: Maybe they should give him a 50 game ban on appeal and we should just accept it too? I agree with a ban but the levels of crazed political correctness being delivered here is totally baffling. Please explain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Condemning slagging someone based on disability is crazed political correctness now. This is genuinely OF level. Can you not read?An 8 game ban for the alleged offence is definitely PC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMessiah Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Falkirk fans have put themselves in a pretty awkward position because they are all aware that mocking a disability is a pathetically low c**t's trick, but almost every one of them was giving it large in the challenge cup thread. Falkirk players and fans in being degenerate scum shocker. Fair fucks to the few who have rightfully condemned the despicable behaviour of the shitebag players and fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young gun Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 It's perfectly acceptable for such a disgusting incident, and I'd hope the same would be done for any other discrimination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Please explain. The ban is disproportionate to the offence. Doh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMessiah Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 1 minute ago, roman_bairn said: The ban is disproportionate to the offence. Doh! Please explain, in detail, what you think the offence was, how severe you feel that is and what you think the punishment should have been. Please give reason why for all thanks x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.