DeeTillEhDeh Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Until they say "Edinburgh" properly I don't give a toss Not as bad as the Yanks with Edinburrow. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 18 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: Not as bad as the Yanks with Edinburrow. Although the ones in Edinburgh (pronounced "Edinburg") Indiana can call their one what they like 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassnahalf Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 On 06/10/2017 at 14:45, DeeTillEhDeh said: Not as bad as the Yanks with Edinburrow. I couldn't give a toss if they said it as EDINBURROW or EDINBRO or even that or place, that midden GLASCOW. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheProgressiveLiberal Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 Edinburrow Glassgo -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 Good to see the "silent majority" raise their profile.Too much of the loudest trying to get their own way.No respect for democracy these people.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
git-intae-thum Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 29 minutes ago, Loondave1 said: Good to see the "silent majority" raise their profile.Too much of the loudest trying to get their own way.No respect for democracy these people.. "Silent majority" my arse. Thats classic beeb fork tongue stuff. No way of knowing for sure who the "majority" are chief. Not unless they have referendum.....oh wait... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crossbill Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 34 minutes ago, Loondave1 said: Good to see the "silent majority" raise their profile.Too much of the loudest trying to get their own way.No respect for democracy these people.. Also interesting to see so many of them raise their hands in salute. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 "Silent majority" my arse. Thats classic beeb fork tongue stuff. No way of knowing for sure who the "majority" are chief. Not unless they have referendum.....oh wait... I trust you are not referring to the "cowboy" referendum the separatists held amongst themselves and claimed victory in true banana republic style. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jethro Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 Freedom for Catalonia, California and Basque area Justice for LBGTQ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
git-intae-thum Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 18 minutes ago, Loondave1 said: I trust you are not referring to the "cowboy" referendum the separatists held amongst themselves and claimed victory in true banana republic style. No. I was making comment on the completely dictatorial and undemocratic decision to block a referendum. This is not the actions of those who feel they carry the "silent majority" I would suggest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 Aahh the self proclaimed troll is in here aswell 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 Anyway speech at 5pm our time from the president of catalonia 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crossbill Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 8 minutes ago, doulikefish said: Anyway speech at 5pm our time from the president of catalonia Let's see if the threat of execution by the Spanish state has softened his resolve. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 what was the turnout in the referendum? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 The self confessed troll gets less and less bites every week. Everyone must be realising what a tragic mess he is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 what was the turnout in the referendum? 42% apparently Which means 38% voted yes, 4% voted no and 58% didn't vote argument seems to be polarised on whether the existence of that 58% can be simply ignored or whether every one of them should be considered as additional no voters because they were obviously boycotting it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 27 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: 42% apparently Which means 38% voted yes, 4% voted no and 58% didn't vote argument seems to be polarised on whether the existence of that 58% can be simply ignored or whether every one of them should be considered as additional no voters because they were obviously boycotting it. Would make sense if it was an unofficial referendum in many respects. Why would you bother otherwise? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 Would make sense if it was an unofficial referendum in many respects. Why would you bother otherwise? In many respects? It was an unofficial referendum in all respects. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Savage Henry said: In many respects? It was an unofficial referendum in all respects. I wasn't doubting that respect. Peoples motives for not bothering to vote however....... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 (edited) 59 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: argument seems to be polarised on whether the existence of that 58% can be simply ignored or whether every one of them should be considered as additional no voters because they were obviously boycotting it. I should probably point out that I wasn't suggesting that either interpretation of events was reasonable Edited October 10, 2017 by topcat(The most tip top) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.