Jump to content

Catalonia


Whitburn Vale

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, welshbairn said:

Creates a precedent. It's not like the UK. Spain could end up like 16th Century Italy.

 

That's a bit of an over-reaction. :lol:

4 hours ago, paul-r-cfc said:


The Catalan Government was elected almost exclusively on a mandate to hold the vote as part of a coalition. That not enough?

 

3 hours ago, John Lambies Doos said:

 

 


Mmmmm. Sounds familiar

 

 

 

The SNP weren't almost exclusively voted on a mandate to hold another vote. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eez-eh said:

Is welshbairn seriously suggesting holding a referendum on whether to hold a referendum?

Not too sure what I meant tbh, but if you got opinion polls saying 60+% wanted a referendum just to settle the issue it would be difficult for the rest of Spain to rule it out. I think the remainers would win a legal referendum anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not too sure what I meant tbh, but if you got opinion polls saying 60+% wanted a referendum just to settle the issue it would be difficult for the rest of Spain to rule it out. I think the remainers would win a legal referendum anyway.

Not sure of the exact figures but polls have said for years that the majority favour a vote either way. Always well above the percentage of those in favour of independence
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The Catalan Generalitat absolutely have a democratic  mandate to call a referendum.  If you need to keep falling back on the illegality as your only defence to such an action, if there is no democratic route then you only leave undemocratic routes.

Whilst the Spanish state have been legally correct they are morally, democratically and intellectually wrong and completely fucking up a situation where had they just allowed the referendum No would likely have won and if they hadn't the democratic hurdles to secession were so labyrinthine to have taken years, if ever, to come to fruition. The threat of UDI is a completely empty one, A UDI Catalonia would be de jure part of Spain and everyone outside of Nagorno - Karabakh would have treated them as such.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Tibbermoresaint said:

Why are you still peddling this nonsense?

Why is it nonsense?  Do you think that France, Portugal, Germany or any other EU country will recognise Catalonia?  The nonsense here is that you are portraying an illegal vote as having some constitutional significance to anyone outside of Catalonia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, strichener said:

Why is it nonsense?  Do you think that France, Portugal, Germany or any other EU country will recognise Catalonia?  The nonsense here is that you are portraying an illegal vote as having some constitutional significance to anyone outside of Catalonia.

What do you think will happen? In a year's time will people be pretending an independent state is actually part of another state? 

Your final sentence betrays your lack of understanding. It is of no importance whether anyone outwith Catalonia considers the vote to have constitutional significance. This is a matter for Catalonia and only Catalonia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tibbermoresaint said:

What do you think will happen? In a year's time will people be pretending an independent state is actually part of another state? 

Your final sentence betrays your lack of understanding. It is of no importance whether anyone outwith Catalonia considers the vote to have constitutional significance. This is a matter for Catalonia and only Catalonia.

A state can only function with recognition.  You are a simpleton and I'm out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tibbermoresaint said:

Why are you still peddling this nonsense?

I'm not going to get into this again with you.

My dissertation was on the relationship between states and the ICC so you can disagree with my conclusions but you can rest assured I have some familiarity with public international law,  interactions between states and the both de jure and de facto functioning of multilateral agreements and institutions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, invergowrie arab said:

 

My dissertation was on the relationship between states and the ICC so you can disagree with my conclusions but you can rest assured I have some familiarity with public international law,  interactions between states and the both de jure and de facto functioning of multilateral agreements and institutions.

You'll forgive me if I regard this as fiction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...