bennett Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 32 minutes ago, hellbhoy said: You are getting closer and closer to having the title as being the worst poster on P&B. That would be terrible, really terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 5 hours ago, bennett said: It's #addthetitles now, you lot had her chance.. I thought you'd said that there hadn't been a chance, due to the rules? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: I thought you'd said that there hadn't been a chance, due to the rules? Chance to campaign for...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, bennett said: Chance to campaign for...... And yet you roundly mocked any such tentative efforts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 53 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: And yet you roundly mocked any such tentative efforts. Doesn't sound like something that I'd do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40951947 surely no need to actually have your players properly registered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 39 minutes ago, Insaintee said: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40951947 surely no need to actually have your players properly registered I saw this earlier. Now the argument will be that while this guy is apparently ineligible, the Rangers players were deemed not to be. Why is the Albion Rovers player ineligible? Does anyone know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 2 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: I saw this earlier. Now the argument will be that while this guy is apparently ineligible, the Rangers players were deemed not to be. Why is the Albion Rovers player ineligible? Does anyone know? No but that won't stop the sevco'ing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 1 minute ago, bennett said: No but that won't stop the sevco'ing. It does again highlight how such questions are traditionally addressed though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 4 hours ago, Monkey Tennis said: It does again highlight how such questions are traditionally addressed though. My understanding is that Rangers could not be punished because they were not caught at the time. So some "statute of limitation," exists. What is the length of that period; a day, an hour, before the game is over, a week, a month?, and when did the SFA actually know that the players were not registered correctly given that the head of the SFA was in on the scam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 8 hours ago, Insaintee said: My understanding is that Rangers could not be punished because they were not caught at the time. So some "statute of limitation," exists. What is the length of that period; a day, an hour, before the game is over, a week, a month?, and when did the SFA actually know that the players were not registered correctly given that the head of the SFA was in on the scam. All good questions, none of which I know the answer to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 35 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: All good questions, none of which I know the answers to. Quess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 What sporting advantage did Albion Rovers gaine by having an improperly registered player on the bench? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenconner Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 11 minutes ago, Insaintee said: What sporting advantage did Albion Rovers gaine by having an improperly registered player on the bench? None, just made them look like diddies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 On 16/08/2017 at 23:44, Insaintee said: My understanding is that Rangers could not be punished because they were not caught at the time. So some "statute of limitation," exists. What is the length of that period; a day, an hour, before the game is over, a week, a month?, and when did the SFA actually know that the players were not registered correctly given that the head of the SFA was in on the scam. Neither was the Albion Rovers player. It was after the match and therefore cannot be dealt with retrospectively. To be consistent, he should have been prevented from playing in the first place or when the teams took to the pitch, someone from the authorities should have ensured that he was removed from the subs bench. No point in trying to now seek redress retrospectively (there may be actually be a point but it will also require redefining the word retrospectively.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 56 minutes ago, strichener said: Neither was the Albion Rovers player. It was after the match and therefore cannot be dealt with retrospectively. To be consistent, he should have been prevented from playing in the first place or when the teams took to the pitch, someone from the authorities should have ensured that he was removed from the subs bench. No point in trying to now seek redress retrospectively (there may be actually be a point but it will also require redefining the word retrospectively.) It's a point I know exists, but genuinely don't understand. Because nothing was done at the time, the Rangers players who were misleadingly registered, couldn't be deemed ineligible long afterwards. I honestly don't know how this works. If there's a time limit, I've not seen it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 12 hours ago, Insaintee said: What sporting advantage did Albion Rovers gaine by having an improperly registered player on the bench? Indeed. That's the point that renders all the stuff about whether a sporting advantage was sought or gained, or whether players would have signed for Rangers anyway, utterly redundant. Those clinging to such rubbish are absolutely missing the point, sometimes deliberately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Move on. Helicopter Sunday was exciting and we (sic) need to get back to days like that..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 3 hours ago, Monkey Tennis said: Indeed. That's the point that renders all the stuff about whether a sporting advantage was sought or gained, or whether players would have signed for Rangers anyway, utterly redundant. Those clinging to such rubbish are absolutely missing the point, sometimes deliberately. Anyway, I do accept LNS's verdict, in that in law, it stands. I simply must accept it and therefore do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Just now, bennett said: Anyway, I do accept LNS's verdict, in that in law, it stands. I simply must accept it and therefore do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.