mjw Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 My keyboard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Ruth Davidson, future Prime Minister of yon United Kingdom, handed her chunky arse, once again , by the FM. Oooft, cringe and fucking lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewDon Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Working theory: Alex Rowley is Ronald Villiers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Sannox Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Davidson and the Tories are ridiculous with their sneering, delusions of grandeur and smugness. Thankfully Surgeon is the master at serving up big servings of telt week after week. Sturgeon is so good that less and less people are voting for her and her party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-MAN Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Sturgeon is so good that less and less people are voting for her and her party. Too many stupid and lazy people who do no research and form their opinions from The Daily Heil, Express, Hootsman and Record or the cafeteria at work imho. Not to mention the bigots who base their views purely on a flag....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 1 hour ago, Glen Sannox said: Sturgeon is so good that less and less people are voting for her and her party. 1) Use grammatically correct English please, minterboy (fewer & fewer) 2) Personal results: Scottish Parliament election, 2011: Glasgow Southside: Nicola Sturgeon 12,306 votes (54%) Scottish Parliament election, 2016: Glasgow Southside: Nicola Sturgeon 15,287 votes (61.4%) 3) Party results: Scottish Parliament election 2011: SNP total constituency votes 902,915 Scottish Parliament election 2016: SNP total constituency votes 1,059,897 Scottish Parliament election 2011: SNP total regional votes 876,421 Scottish Parliament election 2016: SNP total regional votes 953,587 That's 3 major errors in 16 words. Par for the course for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 5 minutes ago, lichtgilphead said: 1) Use grammatically correct English please, minterboy (fewer & fewer) 2) Personal results: Scottish Parliament election, 2011: Glasgow Southside: Nicola Sturgeon 12,306 votes (54%) Scottish Parliament election, 2016: Glasgow Southside: Nicola Sturgeon 15,287 votes (61.4%) 3) Party results: Scottish Parliament election 2011: SNP total constituency votes 902,915 Scottish Parliament election 2016: SNP total constituency votes 1,059,897 Scottish Parliament election 2011: SNP total regional votes 876,421 Scottish Parliament election 2016: SNP total regional votes 953,587 That's 3 major errors in 16 words. Par for the course for you. He's obviously improving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 1) Use grammatically correct English please, minterboy (fewer & fewer) 2) Personal results: Scottish Parliament election, 2011: Glasgow Southside: Nicola Sturgeon 12,306 votes (54%) Scottish Parliament election, 2016: Glasgow Southside: Nicola Sturgeon 15,287 votes (61.4%) 3) Party results: Scottish Parliament election 2011: SNP total constituency votes 902,915 Scottish Parliament election 2016: SNP total constituency votes 1,059,897 Scottish Parliament election 2011: SNP total regional votes 876,421 Scottish Parliament election 2016: SNP total regional votes 953,587 That's 3 major errors in 16 words. Par for the course for you. Minter telt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 18 hours ago, lichtgilphead said: 1) Use grammatically correct English please, minterboy (fewer & fewer) 2) Personal results: Scottish Parliament election, 2011: Glasgow Southside: Nicola Sturgeon 12,306 votes (54%) Scottish Parliament election, 2016: Glasgow Southside: Nicola Sturgeon 15,287 votes (61.4%) 3) Party results: Scottish Parliament election 2011: SNP total constituency votes 902,915 Scottish Parliament election 2016: SNP total constituency votes 1,059,897 Scottish Parliament election 2011: SNP total regional votes 876,421 Scottish Parliament election 2016: SNP total regional votes 953,587 That's 3 major errors in 16 words. Par for the course for you. A tad selective there, not using the latest available results. In terms of the last election, there were indeed less people voting for the SNP, significantly less. So your 3) above would be: General Election 2015: SNP Total Votes 1,454,436 General Election 2017: SNP Total Votes 977,569 The question is really if this is a continuing trend or not but I don't think that it is disputable that the SNP are less popular than they were in the aftermath of the referendum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 A tad selective there, not using the latest available results. In terms of the last election, there were indeed less people voting for the SNP, significantly less. So your 3) above would be: General Election 2015: SNP Total Votes 1,454,436 General Election 2017: SNP Total Votes 977,569 The question is really if this is a continuing trend or not but I don't think that it is disputable that the SNP are less popular than they were in the aftermath of the referendum. An excellent point, with only one huge flaw.If you look at the context, I'm not being selective at all. The thread title is 'FMQ's' and as far as I recall, there are no FMQ's at the Westminster parliament.Even Glen Minter will understand this, as his original comment specifically related to a point about Ruth Davidson, who has never been elected to Westminster.But hey, irrelevant tosh is always part off the debate on P'n'B, especially when you're involved [emoji1] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 45 minutes ago, lichtgilphead said: An excellent point, with only one huge flaw. If you look at the context, I'm not being selective at all. The thread title is 'FMQ's' and as far as I recall, there are no FMQ's at the Westminster parliament. Even Glen Minter will understand this, as his original comment specifically related to a point about Ruth Davidson, who has never been elected to Westminster. But hey, irrelevant tosh is always part off the debate on P'n'B, especially when you're involved Yep dropping 1/2m votes in the last election = irrelevant tosh. You must be Peter Murrell if you are tended to ignore it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 3 minutes ago, strichener said: Yep dropping 1/2m votes in the last election = irrelevant tosh. You must be Peter Murrell if you are tended to ignore it. Well, who's quoting selectively now? Let's look at trends this century and put your isolated example in context: Scottish Parliament - SNP constituency vote (regional vote) 2003 - 449,476 (399659): 2007 - 644,227 (633,401): 2011 - 902,915 (876,421): 2016 - 1,059,857 (953,587) An increase on both measures election on election on election on election European Parliament - SNP total vote 2004 - 231,505: 2009 - 321,007: 2014 - 389, 503 An election on election on election increase Scottish Council SNP First Preferences (FPTP in 2003) 2003 - 451,660: 2007: 585,885: 2012 - 503,233: 2017 - 610,454 All increases again, apart from a slight drop between 2007 & 2012 (and we all know who had an overall majority in 2012) UK General Elections - SNP votes 2001 - 464,314: 2005 - 412,267: 2010 - 491,386: 2015 - 1,454,436: 2017: 977,569 And there's your 1/2m loss. Still, I'm consoled by the fact that 977,569 is effectively double the SNP vote in 2001, 2005 and 2010 Conclusion Since the turn of the century, the SNP have contested 16 Scotland-wide elections. They have increased their vote on the previous election in 13 of them. 3 decreases in 16 is a record that any other political party would be delighted with. All in all, I'm pretty happy with the overall direction of travel... Tick tock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 Well, who's quoting selectively now? Let's look at trends this century and put your isolated example in context:Scottish Parliament - SNP constituency vote (regional vote) 2003 - 449,476 (399659): 2007 - 644,227 (633,401): 2011 - 902,915 (876,421): 2016 - 1,059,857 (953,587) An increase on both measures election on election on election on electionEuropean Parliament - SNP total vote 2004 - 231,505: 2009 - 321,007: 2014 - 389, 503 An election on election on election increaseScottish Council SNP First Preferences (FPTP in 2003) 2003 - 451,660: 2007: 585,885: 2012 - 503,233: 2017 - 610,454 All increases again, apart from a slight drop between 2007 & 2012 (and we all know who had an overall majority in 2012)UK General Elections - SNP votes 2001 - 464,314: 2005 - 412,267: 2010 - 491,386: 2015 - 1,454,436: 2017: 977,569 And there's your 1/2m loss. Still, I'm consoled by the fact that 977,569 is effectively double the SNP vote in 2001, 2005 and 2010Conclusion Since the turn of the century, the SNP have contested 16 Scotland-wide elections. They have increased their vote on the previous election in 13 of them. 3 decreases in 16 is a record that any other political party would be delighted with. All in all, I'm pretty happy with the overall direction of travel... Tick tock. And a 46% survation poll. All that shite and it's still holding up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 4 hours ago, strichener said: Yep dropping 1/2m votes in the last election = irrelevant tosh. You must be Peter Murrell if you are tended to ignore it. Regression to the mean. If I shoot at a target 20 times and they are all miles away, and if my 21st shot hits the bullseye, if my 22nd shot hits just outside the bullseye but within the other 20 then my 22nd shot is not a failure - it is a success. The 22nd shot must be measured against the aggregate of the other 21 shots and not only the preceding. In a dry statistical analysis, and your post gave nothing more, the 22nd shot is a roaring success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 18 hours ago, lichtgilphead said: Well, who's quoting selectively now? Let's look at trends this century and put your isolated example in context: Scottish Parliament - SNP constituency vote (regional vote) 2003 - 449,476 (399659): 2007 - 644,227 (633,401): 2011 - 902,915 (876,421): 2016 - 1,059,857 (953,587) An increase on both measures election on election on election on election European Parliament - SNP total vote 2004 - 231,505: 2009 - 321,007: 2014 - 389, 503 An election on election on election increase Scottish Council SNP First Preferences (FPTP in 2003) 2003 - 451,660: 2007: 585,885: 2012 - 503,233: 2017 - 610,454 All increases again, apart from a slight drop between 2007 & 2012 (and we all know who had an overall majority in 2012) UK General Elections - SNP votes 2001 - 464,314: 2005 - 412,267: 2010 - 491,386: 2015 - 1,454,436: 2017: 977,569 And there's your 1/2m loss. Still, I'm consoled by the fact that 977,569 is effectively double the SNP vote in 2001, 2005 and 2010 Conclusion Since the turn of the century, the SNP have contested 16 Scotland-wide elections. They have increased their vote on the previous election in 13 of them. 3 decreases in 16 is a record that any other political party would be delighted with. All in all, I'm pretty happy with the overall direction of travel... Tick tock. I quoted based on the context of your reply. If you want to stick to your own argument then anything pre-Sturgeon is irrelevant. Regardless, I am sure the original poster will come back on and expand on his post on how he sees less people voting for Sturgeon and her party. 19 hours ago, John Lambies Doos said: And a 46% survation poll. All that shite and it's still holding up. Is this the same poll that indicates a loss of an Indy majority in Holyrood? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 Is this the same poll that indicates a loss of an Indy majority in Holyrood? Guess so; but not really my point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.