Cerberus Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 As much as it was a c**t of a thing to do, 4 years in the jail is a bit much. Harry Clarke is a far worse human being. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Blades Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Is this a serious post? Just not sure if serious? It’s a reference to exchanges earlier in the thread Granny Danger I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 2 hours ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said: Is this a serious post? Just not sure if serious? No, see below. 5 minutes ago, Brother Blades said: It’s a reference to exchanges earlier in the thread Granny Danger I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Blades Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 On 1/3/2018 at 18:37, Granny Danger said: Anyone who doesn’t intimately know this guys circumstances shouldn’t judge. I have no idea what I’d do if I was unfortunate enough to be in his position. I am just very grateful that I am not. No, I think it refers to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Can't help you on this without some evidence. Or links. Did it even happen? You ghoul. Screen shot the story from the bbc app - Not sure what on Earth went on there and it’s pretty scarce information on the matter. How the hell did he find someone who would want to buy something like that? As much as it was a c**t of a thing to do, 4 years in the jail is a bit much. Harry Clarke is a far worse human being. I don’t think it’s a hard sentencing at all given the circumstances. The tramp will be happy he is off the streets though and probably won’t want to get out of prison. Can’t really compare his situation to that of Harry Clarke either as they are two totally different cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 33 minutes ago, throbber said: I don’t think it’s a hard sentencing at all given the circumstances. The tramp will be happy he is off the streets though and probably won’t get out of prison. Can’t really compare his situation to that of Harry Clarke either as their two totally different cases. You can, in that they are two thoroughly despicable characters but one is still at liberty to do whatever the f**k he likes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gannonball Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 Six meals a day...where do I sign up? Weightwatchers I would suggest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch Stanton Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 13 hours ago, gannonball said: Weightwatchers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 On 31/01/2018 at 06:34, throbber said: Not sure what on Earth went on there and it’s pretty scarce information on the matter. How the hell did he find someone who would want to buy something like that? I don’t think it’s a hard sentencing at all given the circumstances. The tramp will be happy he is off the streets though and probably won’t want to get out of prison. Can’t really compare his situation to that of Harry Clarke either as they are two totally different cases. It's not that much of a stretch to think that someone would be willing to pay for photos like that. When you consider that child porn and things like beheadings are rife on the internet then pictures of people lying dying isn't too wild. News agencies could even be interested in them, even if they print them censored. I've not really followed this is great detail but is this perhaps how he was caught out? Trying to sell photos to media who then recognise he was the "hero homeless man"? He may well be happy to be off the streets but I'm not sure what your alternative is here - he deserves jail. I'm also not convinced other prisoners will give him a warm welcome when he's been sent down for stealing from/taking pictures of dying people after a terror attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Blades Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 It's not that much of a stretch to think that someone would be willing to pay for photos like that. When you consider that child porn and things like beheadings are rife on the internet then pictures of people lying dying isn't too wild. News agencies could even be interested in them, even if they print them censored. I've not really followed this is great detail but is this perhaps how he was caught out? Trying to sell photos to media who then recognise he was the "hero homeless man"? He may well be happy to be off the streets but I'm not sure what your alternative is here - he deserves jail. I'm also not convinced other prisoners will give him a warm welcome when he's been sent down for stealing from/taking pictures of dying people after a terror attack. Do you intimately know his circumstances? Unless you do, you are in no position to judge the lowlife scumbag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 21 minutes ago, Brother Blades said: Do you intimately know his circumstances? Unless you do, you are in no position to judge the lowlife scumbag. Wot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honest_Man#1 Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 Just now, The Moonster said: Wot See link to previous Granny Danger quotes from near the top of the page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 2 minutes ago, Honest_Man#1 said: See link to previous Granny Danger quotes from near the top of the page. Ah, apologies to Brother Blades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 Ah, apologies to Brother Blades. I’m not sure why he decided to bring GD’s nonsense up again but it derailed from your good point about how it may have been how the tramp got caught.He probably didn’t have a bank account so must have sold the pics for cash, or maybe he accepted card payment to the stolen card. The BBC report glossed over how he sold the pictures for £100 but it is a big missing piece of the story here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 18 hours ago, throbber said: I’m not sure why he decided to bring GD’s nonsense up again but it derailed from your good point about how it may have been how the tramp got caught. He probably didn’t have a bank account so must have sold the pics for cash, or maybe he accepted card payment to the stolen card. The BBC report glossed over how he sold the pictures for £100 but it is a big missing piece of the story here. Just as likely his purchase at MacDonalds was captured by CCTV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.