Denniston Afc Posted May 13, 2017 Share Posted May 13, 2017 It's something that's been going on for a while a sort of loophole that needs changed.....when teams with more than one team I.e glasgow uni,Cambria etc can use all the players whenever needed,the reasoning is they are signed to club not league.....today for example one of these clubs second teams game was off....while first team were struggling with numbers so they just put them straight into first team squad,it's unfair and needs looked at..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sctv Posted May 13, 2017 Share Posted May 13, 2017 What do you suggest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denniston Afc Posted May 14, 2017 Author Share Posted May 14, 2017 Simple if your signed with first team u can only play for first team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CD 1972 Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 It's the club u sign with though, regardless of whether they have 1-2 teams or not. It's not been looked at because 99.9% of clubs only have one team and we had no need for such a rule but having said that I defo agree with u, they shouldn't be able to just pull players from the other squad to fill the squad that's struggling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Kennedy Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 9 hours ago, Denniston Afc said: It's something that's been going on for a while a sort of loophole that needs changed.....when teams with more than one team I.e glasgow uni,Cambria etc can use all the players whenever needed,the reasoning is they are signed to club not league.....today for example one of these clubs second teams game was off....while first team were struggling with numbers so they just put them straight into first team squad,it's unfair and needs looked at..... I totally agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muller Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 9 hours ago, sctv said: What do you suggest You ask as if it's a real head scratcher of a question Just have them signed to one or the other f**k sake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sctv Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 Don't be a dick muller, I ask to get people putting suggestions up, sometimes someone will come up with a cracker from nowhereOn top of that surely if someone reckons a rule change is needed it would be better to add in what it should be changed to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr lector Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 It's a no brainier when the player signs it's either one or the other Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CD 1972 Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 It is a no bariner but unfortunately the rule makers don't see it that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muller Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 22 minutes ago, sctv said: Don't be a dick muller, I ask to get people putting suggestions up, sometimes someone will come up with a cracker from nowhere On top of that surely if someone reckons a rule change is needed it would be better to add in what it should be changed to Mate it's not something that requires "suggestions" " or a cracker from nowhere" it's pretty much a cut and dry answer to the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sctv Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 Put a proposal in then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Kennedy Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 I remember getting beat by Queens Park in the quarter final of the Scottish. They had a couple of players in the side that would normally have been in the first team but were returning from I injury. I always felt that was unfair. I know that issue has now been resolved. Not that I'm bitter lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muller Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 28 minutes ago, sctv said: Put a proposal in then You're taking this bad. I don't really care about it am just pointing out there's an easy solution to it. Baffling this rule applies in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sctv Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 Lol aye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunner Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 I don't see the huge problem with it. Clubs that can support 2 teams are generally well run and do things properly, otherwise they wouldn't see enough players sign to have 2 teams. I think it's great that 1 club can get that much commitment when some teams are struggling for 16. If I could get a 'b' team which could be used for developing players not quite ready for 'a' team football then I would love it. It's a credit to the club to have that available. Normally i see clubs complain about the potential for 'b' teams to play 'a' team players on occasion - but this rarely happens... and is normally when bringing someone injured back to fitness - again, another brilliant luxury for any club to have. Fair Play to any team which can deliver this.. I'd go so far as to say teams with 20+ man squads, and teams who have always got more players available than can be named would actually benefit from bringing in more bodies and introducing a 'b' team rather than having guys not getting a game every odd weekend. Allow them to play with the club still - at least with a chance to stay fit, sharp and improve to a level where they'd be in the 'a' team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham3179 Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 It is a no bariner but unfortunately the rule makers don't see it that way. Every year clubs are asked for proposals for rule changes and every year there are very few or zero proposals. And then clubs complain about the rules.The rules are made and amended by the clubs, so the clubs are the "rule makers"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heeders Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 What do the association do then do they not want to make any decisions that's a blatantly stupid rule surely it doesn't need clubs to complain before someone in power uses a couple of brain cells? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
active8 Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 A goalkeeper can be signed at anytime,is this so? What's to stop signing a goalkeeper and playing him outfield.How is this policed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
active8 Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 Sorry meant to say signed after deadline day.In today's climate with teams folding ,even well established clubs, I think it's phenomenal that clubs can sustain two or more teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mouth Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 I don't see a massive problem with it from a players point of view. If it came down to it and I was playing one of these " clubs with b teams " I would much rather they pulled players in from the b team so I could play football rather than taking the 3 points by default. Players want to play imo. Well at least I do! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.