calum_gers Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Anyway, my mate has been asking about the video transfer and magazine shop in the background, is it still open? Probably not, it's almost 10 at night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Just now, calum_gers said: Probably not, it's almost 10 at night. I'll pass that on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said: Anyway, my mate has been asking about the video transfer and magazine shop in the background, is it still open? Is it a movie of your's and Eva's nuptials? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Ffs it took Mags four years to learn how to post pics and all you lot can do is criticize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Jagsfan Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Back on topic, the judge asked the jury if any of them had ever been shareholders in Rangers, and could be excused. None were. Would an ex (old Rangers) shareholder be more inclined to think Craig was innocent or guilty? Would an existing Sevco shareholder (through one of the supporters organisations or otherwise) be more inclined to think he was innocent or guilty? Would a juror with the name Partick O'Donnell (for example) from east Glasgow be more inclined to think he was innocent or guilty? Could you reasonably expect to get 15 people from Glasgow who didn't have an existing view on this matter before hearing any evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 10 minutes ago, Jimbo Jagsfan said: Back on topic, the judge asked the jury if any of them had ever been shareholders in Rangers, and could be excused. None were. Would an ex (old Rangers) shareholder be more inclined to think Craig was innocent or guilty? Would an existing Sevco shareholder (through one of the supporters organisations or otherwise) be more inclined to think he was innocent or guilty? Would a juror with the name Partick O'Donnell (for example) from east Glasgow be more inclined to think he was innocent or guilty? Could you reasonably expect to get 15 people from Glasgow who didn't have an existing view on this matter before hearing any evidence? I am none of these things and could be completely impartial. As an aside can the jury award him damages and the freedom of the city? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muirkirk nil Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 James Doleman @jamesdolemanFirst witness of the day, former Rangers manager Walter SmithSmith tells the court he is 69 years old and gives his occupation as "retired"Smith asked to give a "brief history of Rangers" says "they are one of the major clubs in Scottish football" Smith asked "where does the revenue for a football club come from?" Answers owners, season tickets and sale of players Smith confirms that champions league revenue can greatly boost a teams earningsSmith confirms season ticket money provides "working capital" for football clubs at the start of the season"When you are involved in the management finance issues are not something you are too involved with" Smith tells the courtSmith says David Murray stepped down as chairman in 2009 to be replaced by Alistair Johnson.Smith agrees Dave King and Paul Murray were on the board at Rangers in 2010. Agrees he was "focussed on the playing squad" Smith on finances of club: "Never really burdened by overall matter but obviously aware of them."Smith says David Murray said "he was quite willing to sell the club" in 2008 or 2009Smith said he was not surprised Murray wanted to sell the club as had been in place "for a long time"Smith says in March 2011 Murray asked him to come to Edinburgh and told him he was "in the throes" of selling the clubSmith says he first met Craig Whyte in an office in Glasgow before the takeover, not sure whose office it wasSmith says meeting with Whyte was also attended by Matin Bain. Whyte was interested in the financial state of the clubSmith says he told Whyte the team needed Investment to "introduce an element of freshness" to the team.Smith asked if he was aware of a tax case involving Rangers, replies "it was general public knowledge" also aware of "overdraft with bank"Smith says bank overdraft reduced over the 4 years he was there, from £30m to around £16mSmith says he was only manager for 4 days after Whyte took over Advocate depute ends his questions. Defence counsel, Donald Findlay QC rises to cross-examineSmith confirms that as well being manager he was also a director of the clubFindlay suggests "football clubs are also businesses" Smith agrees and confirms as a director he had "fiduciary duties"Findlay suggests most football clubs have a "clash" between what players the support would want and the financial constraintsSmith agrees that any club "is always looking for better players"Findlay asks what % of the turnover of a football club is spent on 1st teamSmith says he "couldn't hazard a guess"Findlay suggests "unless you are going to run a club into the ground there has to be some relationship between turnover and expenditure"Smith agrees that if he asked for £89m for a player "it would be a short conversation" adds "you know the parameters in which you work"Smith says budget for players was: "effectively managed by David Murray and Martin Bain"Findlay suggests that it's up to a player if "he wants to move from Monte Carlo to Govan"Smith agrees transfer fees are often paid in installments, example £1.5m up front with further fees given number of games played etcSmith says "these days as a manager we don't deal with agents on the financial side" Smith says he would be asked "if the fee they [Murray and Bain] were considering for a player was a fair one"Findlay asks Smith if he had been given £5m for players in 2011 "what would you get"?Smith references Jelavic transfer for £3mSmith says Jelavic cost Rangers £3.5m Smith "you hope every player you sign works out for you..but it's not an exact science"Findlay suggests that in 2011 £5m was not a lot of money for transfers"It's not the high end of the market" Smith replies Smith says that a £5m player can help a club get to the Champions League hence justifying the transfer fee Findlay asks if "prudent clubs will budget for being knocked out in the first round of a cup competition""I was never overly-burdened by the financial issues" Smith repliesSmith says: "for the Champions league especially you can look for your club to be making money over the season" Findlay "If you are knocked out in a preliminary round the Champions league money is gone" Smith agrees. Findlay asks Smith if a manager would know that being knocked out of Europe would have a financial impact on a club?"Yes" he repliesSmith asked about managers contract notice period. Replies "both times I was sacked I didn't get any notice"Smith agrees there would usually be an financial agreement in a managers contract if he was sacked Smith agrees sacking a manager could have financial implications for a club, esp as new manager would bring in his own staffCourt adjourns for it's morning break.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Will Donald Findlay be singing during the morning break? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Wait, Donald Findlay is DEFENDING Craig Whyte? Am I reading that right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONisSheep Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 18 minutes ago, Rugster said: Wait, Donald Findlay is DEFENDING Craig Whyte? Am I reading that right? That is correct. Now that Shull is helping out guarding the walls, he's got a bit of spare time. Yours aDONis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 31 minutes ago, Rugster said: Wait, Donald Findlay is DEFENDING Craig Whyte? Am I reading that right? Yup, lawyer in putting money before principles shocker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONisSheep Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 1 hour ago, muirkirk nil said: James Doleman @jamesdolemanFirst witness of the day, former Rangers manager Walter SmithSmith asked "where does the revenue for a football club come from?" Answers owners, season tickets and sale of players Jesus Christ Smith you doddery auld knvt! That's not the right answer! The correct answer is "It's got fvk-all to do with the club, going for 55, nae surrender, the big hoose ya bass"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Quote Findlay suggests "football clubs are also businesses" Smith agrees and confirms as a director he had "fiduciary duties" Is he suggesting that they are one entity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Seems DFQC is not as STAUNCH as the ***s would like us to believe then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kneal Down Caster Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Has Donald Findlay EVER won a case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, Kneal Down Caster said: Has Donald Findlay EVER won a case? Not many. He spends most of his time trying to defend c***s. Deja vu! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muirkirk nil Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Break over, proceedings to resume with further cross-examination of former Rangers' manager Walter SmithFindlay asks Smith if a football club's wage structure includes "bonus" for success on the field He replies yes, for players and managementSmith says his last period in charge was a successful period for the club including reaching a European finalFindlay now asking about Champions League qualifiers, Smith confirms there were three rounds.Smith says his recollection was that in 2011 Rangers went directly to second round of qualifiers for Champions LeagueSmith asked if he can recollect how Rangers did in 2011 Champions league?"Says he cannot remember exactly as was "on holiday at the time"Smith agrees not qualifying for Europe would be a "significant financial blow" to Rangers Smith asked if he knows when decided Ally McCoist would replace him? Says not sure but "was hopeful that would be the case""I thought Mr McCoist was due the opportunity.. he did an excellent job for me" Smith tells the court Alistair Johnson was chairman during Smith's second period at the club minute of understanding confirmsSmith confirms that while chairmanJohnson was resident in the USA so not always "physically present"Smith says that club was run on a day to day basis by chief executive Martin BainFindlay asks Smith: "who called the shots, who was the boss"?Smith says he reported to Martin Bain but did speak to David Murray tooSmith asked if he ever discussed the sake of the club with David MurrayHe says they did talk about it."I don't know the mechanisations of how you put a club up for sale." Smith tells the court Smith says Murray had "made it quite well known" he was willing to sell his Rangers' shares. Agrees it was an "open secret"Findlay suggests that in a police statement Smith said he told Murray: "you would stay until the club was sold"Smith agreesFindlay "there wasn't exactly a stampede of people wanting to buy Rangers was there"? Adds " no wealthy Russian oligarchs"?Findlay suggests that Whyte was only serious bidder for Rangers. Smith agreesFindlay suggests to Whyte "there was a tremendous financial burden on Rangers" Smith says "the banks allow it to happen" Findlay suggests one way the debt could have been managed was to "cut costs" of playing budget Smith says he would "point out the consequences of that action" ie, less success on the fieldSmith says success on the field gives the club a chance to bring in other sources of finance"Findlay suggests "speculating to accumulate is a dangerous business in football" Asks what happens if expensive player gets injuredFindlay says Leeds United "tried to buy success" and are now in the Championship in England"They had successful seasons" Smith replies"Throwing money at it doesn't guarantee success" Findlay suggests "it's a stupid idea" he adds "It's a gamble" Smith replies Findlay to Smith "In 2011 did you know financially how bad things were at Rangers "Not exactly" he replies.Findlay asks if Smith knew the banks were "about to pull the plug on Rangers" witness says he was aware bank had placed person on boardSmith agrees a "Donald Muir" was on the board but did not know who appointed him. Agrees debt to bank was around £18m in 2011.Findlay wants to show a document to the witness but Crown say not immediately available.Lady Stacey says as nearly lunchtime it would make sense to adjourn now while document located and copied.Court rises until 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudder Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Looks like the **** have been well briefed, lying b*****ds Minutes state "Mr Smith says the prospect of administration would be a shambles" Witness says no recollection of discussion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 James Doleman had asda smart price cheese slices pieces and a fruit shoot for lunch, court back in session. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Skidmarks Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Lovely humour from Bennett there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.