McSpreader Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 20 minutes ago, Wee Willie said: I apologise for the delay. I’ve had second thoughts. You spout your spiel then I spout mine, then you, then me ad nauseam. What’s the point? Have a nice day You spout your spiel then I spout mine, then you, then me ad nauseam. What’s the point? Have a nice day You spout spiel and I put you right..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edinabear Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Is this 'Yes' thing still going on? Have they found that extra 400,000 votes to win yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakedee Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Is this 'Yes' thing still going on? Have they found that extra 400,000 votes to win yet? Nope,they're back in their box,now's not the time.Democracy for you.[emoji16]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 On 19/04/2017 at 21:47, The Chlamydia Kid said: Who said nationalism was divisive? Once again, says the weapon with the Union Jack as his avatar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 1 hour ago, edinabear said: Is this 'Yes' thing still going on? Have they found that extra 400,000 votes to win yet? Aye, it's really all rather simple ..... 200,000 voters from other European who will en masse transform themselves to good guys. That, plus 1, is all that is required. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 10 minutes ago, sophia said: Aye, it's really all rather simple ..... 200,000 voters from other European who will en masse transform themselves to good guys. That, plus 1, is all that is required. My thoughts exactly. To Edinabear, a swing is something in his back garden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edinabear Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 36 minutes ago, Fide said: My thoughts exactly. To Edinabear, a swing is something in his back garden. Very good. Freeeedom. Its our oil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, edinabear said: Very good. Freeeedom. Its our oil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Is this 'Yes' thing still going on? Have they found that extra 400,000 votes to win yet? Very good. Freeeedom. Its our oil ^^didnt read the thread title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moses1924 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 I have to agree with Skyline Drifter regarding the fact that just because some MP's represent a constituency in a different part of the country does that mean they have no right in a say in what effects where I live? Using that logic I should be outraged that more MSP's from Glasgow get a vote in the Scottish parliament than MSP's from Stirling, Stirling is a smaller part of Scotland than Glasgow therefore it is entirely reasonable that it has less representation in parliament. The same is true of Scotland within the United Kingdom. I realize that there are many who would say Scotland is a country not a region therefore this argument does not stand up which is fair enough, however, to me Scotland is part of the UK therefore there is no problem with it having an appropriate number of representatives commensurate to its size within the UK parliament. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anonapersona Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 13 minutes ago, moses1924 said: I have to agree with Skyline Drifter regarding the fact that just because some MP's represent a constituency in a different part of the country does that mean they have no right in a say in what effects where I live? Using that logic I should be outraged that more MSP's from Glasgow get a vote in the Scottish parliament than MSP's from Stirling, Stirling is a smaller part of Scotland than Glasgow therefore it is entirely reasonable that it has less representation in parliament. The same is true of Scotland within the United Kingdom. I realize that there are many who would say Scotland is a country not a region therefore this argument does not stand up which is fair enough, however, to me Scotland is part of the UK therefore there is no problem with it having an appropriate number of representatives commensurate to its size within the UK parliament. There was a time when it wasn't a problem but Scotland and England are drifting apart politically. Just saying 'part of the UK' isn't going to solve anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.