buddies1877 Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 If nobody had mentioned a bite, would you look at that image and think it was? I wouldn't look at any images. obviously jack has said the reason he hit out was because he was bitten until there is a video to see what exactly happened.Pics don't say 100% he did bite or 100% he didn't.Just abit of coincidence that people here that jack was bitten and then there is a pic that kinda looks that case but can't be sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilostmyself Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 Probably is blood, seen as he'd just bloodied Millers nose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC55 FFC Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 This pic *could* show Miller biting Jack Baird's right arm, but I'd agree it is inconclusive. If he did bite him it was the lower part of his right arm. Then look at this pic. What is that on Jack Baird's lower right arm? Is it blood? Lee Millers nose was heavily bled by the punch which everyone at the game saw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddie06smfc Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 Lee Millers nose was heavily bled by the punch which everyone at the game saw. Pleasing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senor Bairn Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 I just don't understand why no one at the club (st mirren) has came forward in any sort of capacity to highlight what may have been a horrible act performed on one of their players leading to his reaction and subsequent sending off and collapse of the teams performance. Unless of course it's all bullshit deflection. This 100%, it's just saints fans trying to justify their player hitting out for no reason and costing them the game. It's an absolute minter.Glad wee Baird did what he did, midden were on their way to their first win of the season until he done that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC55 FFC Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 Pleasing It was, changed the game in our favour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 But we still know Miller is a serial diver who has cheated his fellow professionals all of his career. Disgrace to our Sport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Div Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 4 minutes ago, Bairnardo said: Aye blood from Millers nose. Are you honestly now going to infer that Miller not only bit, but pierced his under armour and his skin and drew blood, and yet STILL, nothing from St Mirren? Baird would be going to hospital for tests as would anyone who got bitten and blood drawn ffs. Thats the worst of this thread so far right there. Brutal. Yes, clearly the blood from a punch to Millers nose splattered up into a tiny patch on Jack Baird shirt, right at the exact spot where Miller didn't bite him, and absolutely nowhere else on his white shirt. Suuuuuuuuuuuuure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanky_ffc Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 3 minutes ago, shull said: But we still know Miller is a serial diver who has cheated his fellow professionals all of his career. Disgrace to our Sport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Div Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 5 minutes ago, Senor Bairn said: This 100%, it's just saints fans trying to justify their player hitting out for no reason and costing them the game. It's an absolute minter. Glad wee Baird did what he did, midden were on their way to their first win of the season until he done that. Haven't seen anyone try to justify Jack Baird's actions. He shouldn't have struck Miller, regardless of what happened. You can see the photos for yourself. Falkirk fans will defend Miller to the hilt and that's fair enough, but the pictures above tell the story and up to folk to make their own minds up. Anyway, the game is over, Falkirk won, that's all that really matters. Onwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyBlueArmy1876 Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 5 minutes ago, Div said: This pic *could* show Miller biting Jack Baird's right arm, but I'd agree it is inconclusive. If he did bite him it was the lower part of his right arm. Then look at this pic. What is that on Jack Baird's lower right arm? Is it blood? So you're saying Miller bit Baird...after Baird punched Miller? Your argument is starting to get all over the shop And as others have said, it's quite clearly blood from Miller's nose, which Baird just burst. img 11 here: http://michaelschofield.photoshelter.com/gallery/Ross-Schofield-Falkirk-v-St-Mirren-3-12-2016/G0000OJIqMKkupAI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believe The Hype Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 Hahahaha Div completely clutching at straws now. As has been said, if lee 'hannibal' Miller not only bit him but managed to puncture his skin the boy Baird would have to go to hospital for a jag. Jack Ross has not come out to defend the actions of Baird one bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Scan Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 1 minute ago, Div said: Yes, clearly the blood from a punch to Millers nose splattered up into a tiny patch on Jack Baird shirt, right at the exact spot where Miller didn't bite him, and absolutely nowhere else on his white shirt. Suuuuuuuuuuuuure. Anyone would know this if they studied blood splatter Nothing to see, Miller bit him,Baird cracked Miller and cost his team the game Move on,Baird will need to kerb his temper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Div Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 2 minutes ago, NavyBlueArmy1876 said: So you're saying Miller bit Baird...after Baird punched Miller? Your argument is starting to get all over the shop And as others have said, it's quite clearly blood from Miller's nose, which Baird just burst. img 11 here: http://michaelschofield.photoshelter.com/gallery/Ross-Schofield-Falkirk-v-St-Mirren-3-12-2016/G0000OJIqMKkupAI Clearly the two players tangled on the floor, Miller has bit Baird, who has then lashed out and punched him, bursting his nose. On that pristine white shirt of Jack Baird's shirt the only blood on it is that exact spot where Miller is pictured holding his arm to his mouth. Funny that isn't it? An absolutely AMAZING coincidence that there is no blood anywhere else but there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falkirkyabass Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 Div mate give it a bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Div Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 3 minutes ago, Uncle Scan said: Anyone would know this if they studied blood splatter I've a 2:1 in Blood Splatter m'laud. The case rests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilostmyself Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 The pictures don't show anything implying a bite, you'd never come to that conclusion if it hadn't been suggested. The player doesn't protest to the ref, the manager doesn't defend the player and the club doesn't come out against Lee Miller, this is clutching at straws completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btb Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 4 minutes ago, Uncle Scan said: Anyone would know this if they studied blood splatter Nothing to see, Miller bit him,Baird cracked Miller and cost his team the game Move on,Baird will need to kerb his temper Only one man can solve this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC55 FFC Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 I suppose if someone keeps saying it was a bite, even though no one involved does, it must have been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Div Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 5 minutes ago, Believe The Hype said: Hahahaha Div completely clutching at straws now. As has been said, if lee 'hannibal' Miller not only bit him but managed to puncture his skin the boy Baird would have to go to hospital for a jag. Jack Ross has not come out to defend the actions of Baird one bit. No pun intended I hope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.