Daz80 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Amarillo after the goals. Sweet Maria, is this still happening? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 42 minutes ago, Yoss said: So, firstly, there's clearly no suggestion of any physical contact between Houston and the ref. I expect Houston was just being an aggressive and argumentative shit - which is default mode for him but it's not okay. I know I generally back referees but I'm not particularly convinced with his handling of the Benedictus incident. Refs can wait "a few seconds" before going back for a free kick if no advantage develops: there were, at most, four seconds elapsed between Benedictus's bookable foul and the ball being run out of play - even if you accept the ref's assessment of that last bit, that's still within a time period when I'd want the original foul, if I were Falkirk. Anyway, great result, didn't see that coming. Loved our third goal. Yes there is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbornbairn Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 54 minutes ago, Zen Archer said: Yes there is. Not as I recall and not from the pictures on Raith tv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L. Brilliant Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Barry Cook eh, crap ref but a slamming bolognese etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 7 minutes ago, NewBornBairn said: Not as I recall and not from the pictures on Raith tv When the ref was talking to Locke, Houston got frustrated and went over and pushed him away from Locke and onto the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbornbairn Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, Zen Archer said: When the ref was talking to Locke, Houston got frustrated and went over and pushed him away from Locke and onto the pitch. Not what he got sent to the stand though so the ref didn't mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Just now, NewBornBairn said: Not what he got sent to the stand though so the ref didn't mind. I'm sure the ref was using the totting up rule and sent him off for being a pushy wee c**t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbornbairn Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Aye the disgrace of it, telling a ref to do his job. Houstie should have waited ten seconds for him to change his mind and send Locke off instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dudu Dahan pal Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Houston in being a bad loser shock. Bet he still wakes up in a rage thinking about stubbsy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BountyBairn Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 17 minutes ago, Hibeesbounce75 said: Houston in being a bad loser shock. Bet he still wakes up in a rage thinking about stubbsy Aye Houston will be well raging that he has a job and Stubbs is on the dole! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liam_barnett Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dudu Dahan pal Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Aye Houston will be well raging that he has a job and Stubbs is on the dole! I doubt he will be on the dole, m8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 2 hours ago, Daz80 said: Amarillo after the goals. Sweet Maria, is this still happening? Marie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrDust Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Hibeesbounce75 said: Houston in being a bad loser shock. Bet he still wakes up in a rage thinking about stubbsy What part of the hungrier team won do you not understand ? I'm sure Houstie laughed like rest of us at Stubbsy failure again. 3 hours ago, Yoss said: So, firstly, there's clearly no suggestion of any physical contact between Houston and the ref. I expect Houston was just being an aggressive and argumentative shit - which is default mode for him but it's not okay. I know I generally back referees but I'm not particularly convinced with his handling of the Benedictus incident. Refs can wait "a few seconds" before going back for a free kick if no advantage develops: there were, at most, four seconds elapsed between Benedictus's bookable foul and the ball being run out of play - even if you accept the ref's assessment of that last bit, that's still within a time period when I'd want the original foul, if I were Falkirk. The ref was obviously over at Locke for being aggressive and questioning more than one decision, one of them being a decision you feel Raith got away with. Houstie was angry that the game was stopped to a nothing situation as Locke started questioning other decisions, it's a no brainer as you can't get back into the game when play is stopped for a nothing incident. He was sent to stand as his back was turned and obviously aggrieved that play was stopped, I'd understand if he was in his face, swearing and wouldn't let it go but no as he was walking back to the dug out still annoyed the game was stopped and not disagreeing about a decision(s). The ref for me got the decision right, Sibbald had full control of the ball, faced up to the next defender and lost the ball taking the wrong option, if he struggled on his feet after the challenge then obviously the advantage is lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dudu Dahan pal Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 The ref was obviously over at Locke for being aggressive and questioning more than one decision, one of them being a decision you feel Raith got away with. Houstie was angry that the game was stopped to a nothing situation as Locke started questioning other decisions, it's a no brainer as you can't get back into the game when play is stopped for a nothing incident. He was sent to stand as his back was turned and obviously aggrieved that play was stopped, I'd understand if he was in his face, swearing and wouldn't let it go but no as he was walking back to the dug out still annoyed the game was stopped and not disagreeing about a decision(s). The ref for me got the decision right, Sibbald had full control of the ball, faced up to the next defender and lost the ball taking the wrong option, if he struggled on his feet after the challenge then obviously the advantage is lost Did he fail in May, m88? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rover the Moon Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Kerr [emoji23] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raith25 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 That miss though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broken Algorithms Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Just noticed that this game actually had a higher attendance than the St Johnstone v Dundee game. Fair play to Falkirk for keeping their attendances up. Still delighted we won having seen us lose on various occasions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daz80 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Rugster said: Marie The Bain of my life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senator Frimpton Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 2 hours ago, Daz80 said: The Bain of my life. Curie's what ails you though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.