TheMessiah Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Henderson to deliver ..... said: Part 2 of 'H*n or not a H*n' H*n Not a H*n H*n Not a H*n I've run out of greeniesfor the day, otherwise the "*** or not a ***" series would be getting showered. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 16, 2018 Author Share Posted May 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, TheMessiah said: What McQuade was so eloquently referring to was what has been discribed earlier in this thread as "**** without the bus fair" Such pathetic evasion. Really. You asked for just one example of *** = Protestant and you got it. Quick summary: The diddies of here agree that '***' doesn't equal Rangers fans. They asked for 'one single example' where *** = Proddy and the got it. I fully expect them to cling to their favourite sectarian term of abuse until they see sense...which may take some time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMessiah Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: Such pathetic evasion. Really. You asked for just one example of *** = Protestant and you got it. Quick summary: The diddies of here agree that '***' doesn't equal Rangers fans. They asked for 'one single example' where *** = Proddy and the got it. I fully expect them to cling to their favourite sectarian term of abuse until they see sense...which may take some time. Decent WUM that fair play. Now since you're clearly going to backpedal and throw up straw men about this issue. How do you feel about your club ignoring the victim of child abuse you alcoholic bigoted h*n c**t? Edited May 16, 2018 by TheMessiah 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xj2011 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: Such pathetic evasion. Really. You asked for just one example of *** = Protestant and you got it. Quick summary: The diddies of here agree that '***' doesn't equal Rangers fans. They asked for 'one single example' where *** = Proddy and the got it. I fully expect them to cling to their favourite sectarian term of abuse until they see sense...which may take some time. because one or two ill informed people on a football forum think that it is a religious term doesn't hold up as any sort of credible evidence, and I think you know that 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 6 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: Such pathetic evasion. Really. You asked for just one example of *** = Protestant and you got it. Quick summary: The diddies of here agree that '***' doesn't equal Rangers fans. They asked for 'one single example' where *** = Proddy and the got it. I fully expect them to cling to their favourite sectarian term of abuse until they see sense...which may take some time. Except it's not an example of that at all. He said Protestant fans of The Rangers are ***s and he's right. So are ALL other fans of The Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Angelo Barksdale Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 There's a reason that Hearts fans (and to a lesser extent Killie and a couple of others) get upset when you call them diet **** or **** without the bus fare. It's got absolutely nothing to do with religion. It's got everything to do with being in anyway associated with Rangers. 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 I love calling Rangers fans ****.Love it.Even better when they think it’s sectarian and it cuts that bit deeper.It’s not even close as bad as them deflecting away from the David stuff though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 16, 2018 Author Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 hour ago, TheMessiah said: Please provide me a single example of the word *** being used towards someone exclusively because they are protestant rather than because they support Rangers. 5 minutes ago, xj2011 said: because one or two ill informed people on a football forum think that it is a religious term doesn't hold up as any sort of credible evidence, and I think you know that You have to remember the context. See above. I was asked for, " single example of the word *** being used towards someone exclusively because they are protestant" and I did. Whether what I posted is representative or not is immaterial. I met the brief. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMessiah Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: You have to remember the context. See above. I was asked for, " single example of the word *** being used towards someone exclusively because they are protestant" and I did. Whether what I posted is representative or not is immaterial. I met the brief. We've moved on from that neebs. 10 minutes ago, TheMessiah said: How do you feel about your club ignoring the victim of child abuse you alcoholic bigoted h*n c**t? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Disappointing to see so many fall for such a blatant attempt to change the subject. A Rangers fan saw the opportunity to turn this around and go on the offensive, and goodness me he didn't half to that. Eighteen posts that basically amount to "LOOK, A SQUIRREL!!!" Some people will turn a blind eye to anything their side does. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xj2011 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: You have to remember the context. See above. I was asked for, " single example of the word *** being used towards someone exclusively because they are protestant" and I did. Whether what I posted is representative or not is immaterial. I met the brief. I would suspect the "single example" requested was meaning from a reputable objective and reliable source, and not a "because someone down the pub said it was" kind of example that you threw up. You met the brief yes, well done, but I would give you a D- for missing the point and general lack of effort 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, GordonS said: Disappointing to see so many fall for such a blatant attempt to change the subject. A Rangers fan saw the opportunity to turn this around and go on the offensive, and goodness me he didn't half to that. Eighteen posts that basically amount to "LOOK, A SQUIRREL!!!" Some people will turn a blind eye to anything their side does. Fair dos. Back on topic. Gordon Neely was a very very sick ***. Edited May 16, 2018 by BawWatchin 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 16, 2018 Author Share Posted May 16, 2018 2 hours ago, The_Kincardine said: As for 'David'? I'd really like to know the detail of what happened between the bloke's lawyers and our lawyers two years ago. I'd like a clear, cant-free and thoroughly honest brief from Ibrox explaining what transpired. If we did, actually, pass the buck back to the liquidators then that is a dreadful dereliction and one I am ashamed of. If the report linked to is correct than I have to agree with this quote: "My issue's always been that they may be a …different legal entity, but they're still the same club. And although they don't have the same maybe liability legally, certainly morally they're still the same club." We have to be accountable for what happened and to deal with it in a humane and compassionate way. 3 minutes ago, TheMessiah said: We've moved on from that neebs. 3 minutes ago, GordonS said: Disappointing to see so many fall for such a blatant attempt to change the subject. A Rangers fan saw the opportunity to turn this around and go on the offensive, and goodness me he didn't half to that. Eighteen posts that basically amount to "LOOK, A SQUIRREL!!!" I replied to a post that vaunted The H word. I certainly didn't initiate it. I also made it clear that I deprecate the "Deal with the liquidators" stance and stated we have a moral responsibility here. I derided the 'pass the buck' attitude. That posters think either, a. I glided over the issue with the possible abuse and b. initiated the H Word discussion is laughable but not unusual. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xj2011 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, BawWatchin said: Fair dos. Back on topic. Gordon Neely is a very very sick ***. I don't think his name deserves a mention to be honest... what probably does deserve a mention is the years and years of hypocrisy displayed by rangers fans taking a sick and twisted delight in this sort of abuse committed by others, yet not saying a single word about it when it is revealed some of their own were also guilty of it Edited May 16, 2018 by xj2011 change of wording 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMessiah Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: I replied to a post that vaunted The H word. I certainly didn't initiate it. I also made it clear that I deprecate the "Deal with the liquidators" stance and stated we have a moral responsibility here. I derided the 'pass the buck' attitude. That posters think either, a. I glided over the issue with the possible abuse and b. initiated the H Word discussion is laughable but not unusual. You're correct, not unusual at all for you to try to glide over your club shaming itself and scottish football yet again with whataboutery and pointless oneupmanship. I assume from these sentiments that you unreservedly condemn your club(both oldco and newco)'s actions in this whole situation? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 7 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: I replied to a post that vaunted The H word. I certainly didn't initiate it. I also made it clear that I deprecate the "Deal with the liquidators" stance and stated we have a moral responsibility here. I derided the 'pass the buck' attitude. That posters think either, a. I glided over the issue with the possible abuse and b. initiated the H Word discussion is laughable but not unusual. Just so you know, I won't be debating it and this'll be my only reply to you. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 From the record, tho Scoops probably no where near the mark. Steven Gerrard aims to make West Ham’s Reece Burke his next Rangers signing. The new Ibrox boss landed Scott Arfield from Burnley last week. Record Sportrevealed on Tuesday night Gerrard is also eyeing Brighton defender Connor Goldson. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 *Sweep Sweep Sweep* 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 16, 2018 Author Share Posted May 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, TheMessiah said: You're correct, not unusual at all for you to try to glide over your club shaming itself and scottish football yet again with whataboutery and pointless oneupmanship. Again, I did not initiate the H Word discussion. Again, I stated unreservedly, that, "If we did, actually, pass the buck back to the liquidators then that is a dreadful dereliction and one I am ashamed of. " That you and a phalanx of diddies sought to defend a sectarian term is really down to you. I deprecate what seems to be our actions here and denounce an unacceptable slur. You seem to prefer to ignore the former and justify the latter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMessiah Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: Again, I did not initiate the H Word discussion. Again, I stated unreservedly, that, "If we did, actually, pass the buck back to the liquidators then that is a dreadful dereliction and one I am ashamed of. " That you and a phalanx of diddies sought to defend a sectarian term is really down to you. I deprecate what seems to be our actions here and denounce an unacceptable slur. You seem to prefer to ignore the former and justify the latter. Because the latter is a slur, yes, but wholly acceptable as it is unreservedly aimed a Rangers fans. Please see Hendo's helpful "H*n or not h*n" posts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.