Bobby Skidmarks Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 4 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said: Many is that 4 loans and a few soft loans can see trouble ahead in the dressing room and board room with the ones under contract. I don't think this will happen at all tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 29 minutes ago, Bobby Skidmarks said: I don't think this will happen at all tbh. If you have half the first 11 only on loan its going to upset the dressing room. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Skidmarks Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 5 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said: If you have half the first 11 only on loan its going to upset the dressing room. Not buying it. I'm hardly the biggest Rangers fan on here but if they manage to start winning then I don't think it'll upset them too much. Its not like they're fucking world beaters anyway. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Bobby Skidmarks said: Not buying it. I'm hardly the biggest Rangers fan on here but if they manage to start winning then I don't think it'll upset them too much. Its not like they're fucking world beaters anyway. Players only think about two things one is how much dosh they get to play and two they want to be in the first 11, for me 1 or 2 loan players is ok but having 4 or more will cause problems with the players that are on full time contracts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 To affirm my Sevco obsession you post extracts from a Celtic blog. That's told me. Clipped from a twitter feed and forwarded on to me, I’ve no interest in following any of the anti Rangers ramblings across your club’s forums or posting on the threads of other clubs on P&B. Unless it’s match day and they’re playing us, the detailed ‘happenings’ with other teams are of no concern. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Estragon Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 Players only think about two things one is how much dosh they get to play and two they want to be in the first 11, for me 1 or 2 loan players is ok but having 4 or more will cause problems with the players that are on full time contracts. Nah, if someone's out of the first xi they're not bothered whether the guy keeping them out is permanently contracted to their club or not - the end result is the same. There has been a suggestion in recent years that certain players have been signed up on loan with the express condition that they play. This, if it's anything more than a fan's conspiracy theory, is another matter entirely - and would leave a bitter taste I'm sure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 4 hours ago, RedRob72 said: Clipped from a twitter feed and forwarded on to me, I’ve no interest in following any of the anti Rangers ramblings across your club’s forums The person who forwarded it on to you obviously thinks you do. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenlantern Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 Anti rangers [emoji1] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 14 hours ago, wastecoatwilly said: If you have half the first 11 only on loan its going to upset the dressing room. We have a fair few of the starting 11 out injured/struggling with fitness, we needed players in. A few of the loans also have the option of being permanent.... -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 2 hours ago, bennett said: A few of the loans also have the option of being permanent.... Yeah when the season ticket money comes in. Nothing to do with you then... 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 According to the sun we're bringing Hyndman back. Not too keen on this, he seemed to lose interest at times last season. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8MileBU Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 According to the sun we're bringing Hyndman back. Not too keen on this, he seemed to lose interest at times last season. I’m all for it. Get him to Ibrox and tell him to bring his maw. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 Decent signings for an also ran Scottish team. If Murty can get draw with Celtic with the likes of Danny Wilson and Jason Holt then he'll fancy getting a few wins with better players. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepundit Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 Been a good transfer window for Rangers so far. Can totally understand why Rangers are negotiating loan signings rather than permanent ones. After all, whats the point in spending money in January only for someone to replace Murty and decide to offload them on the cheap in the summer? I think enough money has already been wasted this season! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightswoodBear Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, bennett said: According to the sun we're bringing Hyndman back. Not too keen on this, he seemed to lose interest at times last season. I liked Hyndman when he was here last time, but I think he was made to look better by the utter dross round about him. We're heading towards being top heavy on midfielders and I don't think he's a massive step up from what we currently have. Edited January 17, 2018 by KnightswoodBear 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 11 hours ago, RedRob72 said: Unless it’s match day and they’re playing us, the detailed ‘happenings’ with other teams are of no concern. All rather narrow minded Rob. Some of us are more concerned with the wider game. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gannonball Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 10 hours ago, Estragon said: Nah, if someone's out of the first xi they're not bothered whether the guy keeping them out is permanently contracted to their club or not - the end result is the same. There has been a suggestion in recent years that certain players have been signed up on loan with the express condition that they play. This, if it's anything more than a fan's conspiracy theory, is another matter entirely - and would leave a bitter taste I'm sure. I have heard of parent clubs writing in to a loan contract that should the player not play the club has to pay a larger contribution. Cant see that being too standard though. Strangely we were linked with Hyndman towards the end of last season after he got injured, think it was papers just stirring it though 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 59 minutes ago, Cerberus said: Decent signings for an also ran Scottish team. If Murty can get draw with Celtic with the likes of Danny Wilson and Jason Holt then he'll fancy getting a few wins with better players. He can fancy it all he wants. It aint happening. This’ll be the third Sevco team to try... and fail. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 17, 2018 Author Share Posted January 17, 2018 1 hour ago, bennett said: According to the sun we're bringing Hyndman back. Not too keen on this, he seemed to lose interest at times last season. I can't see it and I'm not sure he'd offer much. His maw's welcome in High Wycombe anytime, though. 48 minutes ago, thepundit said: Been a good transfer window for Rangers so far. Can totally understand why Rangers are negotiating loan signings rather than permanent ones. After all, whats the point in spending money in January only for someone to replace Murty and decide to offload them on the cheap in the summer? I think enough money has already been wasted this season! I'd still like wee Docherty but, even without him, it has been not only a good window but a good winter break. Playing with flair and elan on the world stage was highly creditable as evidenced by the number of posters on here sharing links and praising us. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gannonball Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 When did Sevco sign Harvey? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.