dundeefc1783 Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 117-112 what a lot of absolute shite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Oh, well. Rematch in Glasgow? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taurus Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Cant argue with that 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch road Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Those scores lol. Boxing is a joke 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Oh, well. Rematch in Glasgow? Crolla wouldn't be interested. Never fights outside the MEN. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dundeefc1783 Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Cant argue with that What with a 117-112. No danger is that correct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chlamydia Kid Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 No it isn’t a joke at all. You could win a close fight 120-108 if you just edged each round which is what Crolla did in most rounds. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neilly Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 I do not want to see a rematch in Glasgow or anywhere. Can't really argue with the result. Burns just doesn't offer enough. Taylor would smash him to pieces. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chlamydia Kid Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Just because it was 117-112 doesn’t meant he smashed him about. Just means he edged more of the rounds. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Stubbs Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 3 minutes ago, Alan Stubbs said: Think Burns might've worked his way back into at least a draw there. So many close rounds though, worry the judges will give Crolla the benefit of the doubt. There it is. 117 man, just f**k off. I wouldn't have complained if Crolla had just edged it, annoying how predictable this pish is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMDP Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Very close fight, two nice fellas.I had crolla by one, but could've even seen it for burns. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taurus Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 What with a 117-112. No danger is that correct. It could easily been the opposite and I couldn't argue that either . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chlamydia Kid Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 . Taylor would smash him to pieces. How do you think Taylor would do against Crolla? Baroso? Perez? Or Linares? I think it’s ridiculous saying taylor would smash burns when he’s never been near anyone at that sort of level. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dundeefc1783 Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Just because it was 117-112 doesn’t meant he smashed him about. Just means he edged more of the rounds. I don't think he did. I had it a draw. Crolla may have been busier but wasn't actually connecting with much as Burns was blocking most of his shots with his arms. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neilly Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Just now, Alan Stubbs said: There it is. 117 man, just f**k off. I wouldn't have complained if Crolla had just edged it, annoying how predictable this pish is. What are you talking about? Crolla shaded most of the close rounds, certainly in my eyes. The judges have seen it that way as well. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chlamydia Kid Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Folk seemTo think 117-112 means you’ve been hammered. Burns could have smashed Crolla for 3 rounds but Crolla just get the benefit of the doubt in 8 of them, draw one and it is a 117-112. So looking at it as a whole it’s really close but round by round it looks big. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMDP Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Just because it was 117-112 doesn’t meant he smashed him about. Just means he edged more of the rounds. Have you boxed m8? -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chlamydia Kid Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Have you boxed m8? No, never swung a punch in ma puff. Would love to lace up a pair of gloves one day but... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neilly Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 1 minute ago, The Chlamydia Kid said: How do you think Taylor would do against Crolla? Baroso? Perez? Or Linares? I think it’s ridiculous saying taylor would smash burns when he’s never been near anyone at that sort of level. They are all fighting at a different weight from Taylor so not sure the relevance of that question. Burns is shot and offensively has nothing to offer. Taylor is viscious on the inside and would have too much movement for Burns. What attributes does Burns have to beat Taylor? Experience is just a word that I think loses meaning when a young, fresh skilled boxer has just too much in the locker for a shot Burns. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dundeefc1783 Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 Folk seemTo think 117-112 means you’ve been hammered. Burns could have smashed Crolla for 3 rounds but Crolla just get the benefit of the doubt in 8 of them, draw one and it is a 117-112. So looking at it as a whole it’s really close but round by round it looks big. Don't think Crolla won 8 rounds though. I could see the argument for him shading it but I certainly don't think he done enough to be given 8 rounds. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.