BallochSonsFan Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 Theres a whole website dedicated to cats that look like Hitler. They're known as Kitlers. I doubt that he's an anti-Semite. I strongly suspect he's an attention-seeking cockwomble who deserves to have every facial piercing removed by force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaviliunas Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 When he started shouting sieg heil and the dog started saluting it was funny as f**k tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgecutter Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 What exactly has he been charged with? Posting offensive material under the Communications Act 2003. So one of the comments claims anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 While whether or not police should be wasting time on him if you post anything online for the world to see involving making light of gassing Jews you are likely going get yourself in trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Man Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 I used to work beside a thick as f**k Rangers supporting fork lift driver who taught his Alsatian to go into attack mode whenever he pointed at someone and said "catholic". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 I used to work beside a thick as f**k Rangers supporting fork lift driver who taught his Alsatian to go into attack mode whenever he pointed at someone and said "catholic".Manchester Police used similar training for their dogs when the **** were down for the uefa cup final. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 Christ almighty, the YouTube comments Any news of a follow-up video? Surely the money shot for this will be the girlfriend finding out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizfit Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 What does Romeo think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generalissimo Trump Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 No such thing as free speech any more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgecutter Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 No such thing as free speech any more. I guess this isn't America where you can easily get a permit to march down the street with big protest banners telling the Jews to disappear. Stupid considering their gun laws there, but entirely legal to do so regardless of the seethe it would inevitably cause. Not a freedom I'd want in the UK tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generalissimo Trump Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 I guess this isn't America where you can easily get a permit to march down the street with big protest banners telling the Jews to disappear. Stupid considering their gun laws there, but entirely legal to do so regardless of the seethe it would inevitably cause. Not a freedom I'd want in the UK tbh. No, you'd prefer unfreedom and the government being able to control what opinions are permissable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BallochSonsFan Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 No such thing as free speech any more. In fairness, free speech should never be a default justification for somebody behaving like a complete bell end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 How many posts will The Donald make it to before his freedoms are infringed upon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generalissimo Trump Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 In fairness, free speech should never be a default justification for somebody behaving like a complete bell end.It should be a justification for not being arrested in any free society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogmc Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 horse.jpg A couple of years ago I took a picture of this horse, which was over the wall from Whitehill Welfare's ground. Remind you of anyone....? Its di cotton from line of duty!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Mein Kat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 It should be a justification for not being arrested in any free society. Within reason, perhaps. Citing "Freedom of speech" does not mean you do not have the responsibilities that go with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generalissimo Trump Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Within reason, perhaps. Citing "Freedom of speech" does not mean you do not have the responsibilities that go with it. Who defines what counts as "reasonable"? The government? The EU? Of course people have responsibility to not say stupid things. Doesn't mean you should be arrested for not being responsible though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Who defines what counts as "reasonable"? The government? The EU? Of course people have responsibility to not say stupid things. Doesn't mean you should be arrested for not being responsible though. I think that quite often these days people believe they have the right not to be offended. I think that is bollocks. I also think that in some cases, the person doing the offending should quite rightly get his arse felt by the authorities. I don't see the point in splitting hairs or going into deep conversations about the manufacturing of consent within context of wider society. Most people know where the line is and when to cross it or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generalissimo Trump Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 I think that quite often these days people believe they have the right not to be offended. I think that is bollocks. I also think that in some cases, the person doing the offending should quite rightly get his arse felt by the authorities. I don't see the point in splitting hairs or going into deep conversations about the manufacturing of consent within context of wider society. Most people know where the line is and when to cross it or not. Again - who decides what is illegal or not and why do you trust them so much to chuck away our liberty for the "right" reasons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.