HaikuHibee Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Those peddling the theory are a bunch of f*cking lunatics. Better? I agree a bit. McColm's still a massive dick. Do you really care? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Losing your shit over a children's author's twitter account. How do you explain that to non Scottish people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Shut up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Losing your shit over a children's author's twitter account. How do you explain that to non Scottish people? I'm sure people living in incorporated countries that have just shit themselves at the prospect of becoming sovereign states would geddit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkoRaj Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Losing your shit over a children's author's twitter account. How do you explain that to non Scottish people? Yeh it's such a Scottish thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nowthennowthen Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 BT's fine was widely reported, even by the biased BBC. The electoral commission accepted they was no skull-duggery, although one of BT's high profile geezers used be Chancellor of the Exchequer, so personally, I would have expected better. A lack of knowledge of what is required to be reported was a common stumbling block for campaigners. BT used probably the most esteemed accountancy practice in the country which doesn't really fit with a biscuit tin mentality. On the general topic, JK Rowling being conceited on twitter has no real relevance to the polices forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaikuHibee Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Losing your shit over a children's author's twitter account. How do you explain that to non Scottish people? My Team:Rangers That's brilliant mate. How do you explain this pic? "Harry Potter fans"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Cool. I might pinch 'over-elaborate, jargon-based pishtalk ' for future use. It's especially useful when conversing with management consultants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 The whole 'Spanner is McColm' thing is tragicomic übernat groupthink at its finest. Or it's one of those clear cases of 'in the know' as it turns out to be him. The evidence looked pretty substantial to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenconner Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 That's brilliant mate. How do you explain this pic? "Harry Potter fans"? Teddy bears maybe??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rational Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 That's brilliant mate. How do you explain this pic? "Harry Potter fans"? Is that some group chat picture off Grindr? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaikuHibee Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Is that some group chat picture off Grindr? .. or Rowling's Twitter? They're both are a den of filth.... or so I've been told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 .. or Rowling's Twitter? They're both are a den of filth.... or so I've been told. Her lawyers will be seeing you offline ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 BT's fine was widely reported, even by the biased BBC. The electoral commission accepted they was no skull-duggery, although one of BT's high profile geezers used be Chancellor of the Exchequer, so personally, I would have expected better. A lack of knowledge of what is required to be reported was a common stumbling block for campaigners. BT used probably the most esteemed accountancy practice in the country which doesn't really fit with a biscuit tin mentality. On the general topic, JK Rowling being conceited on twitter has no real relevance to the polices forum. There's no such thing as an esteemed accountancy practice, they're all crooks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nizzy Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 The evidence looked pretty substantial to me. Does it, aye? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Does it, aye?Er, aye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nizzy Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 What evidence is that, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Or it's one of those clear cases of 'in the know' as it turns out to be him. The evidence looked pretty substantial to me. THEY SHARED THE SAME PHOTO ON TWITTER A COUPLE OF TIMES. LOOKS LIKE AN OPEN AND SHUT CASE EH? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Oaft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rational Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Ahh, light shines on yonder window. Rowling has said that there's 11 wizard schools dotted throughout the world, it is to do with her website and I think there's possibly a new book coming out to match the 'creatures' film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.