Jump to content

My book "KERBY", rated 5-stars


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 386
  • Created
  • Last Reply

:lol:

It doesn't take "determination" to get published this way. So long as it's not breaking any laws, Amazon will "publish" any old shite this way - the cut they get from any sales more than justifies the site space used & whatever print-on-demand copies are sold.

It's the old Citron Press scam on an industrial scale:-

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2000/aug/16/books.booksnews

Any one of you out there could get the free software and do this yourself with any old rubbish. Go on, try it. Amazon doesn't care so long as you follow their guidelines, the cut they take from the meagre sales made (& their size of operations) more than justifies any expense from the limited downloads or pay to print.

At least this one frees the authors from falling for the vanity press trap of paying for their own printing (in that respect for once good luck to Amazon). If it stopped Deadasdillinger from potentially being conned out of thousands of pounds, three cheers, but please don't be naive enough to think it's any big deal to get published in this manner.

But pity the poor authors when they start wondering when they're going to make any money from the fruits of their labours, & discover the hard way Amazon aren't doing it because they want to "revolutionise the printing industry". It's because if there's a sucker to rip off, they're happy to help them on their way.

For example: http://www.takepermission.com/hidden-fee-self-publishing-amazon/

But jealous of a vanity press ebook which - from what little the author has deemed fit to actually show - reads little better than if he'd cut and paste the routine nostalgia circle jerk threads which can be read on P&B daily & everywhere else on the net for free? Please, spare us all the display of faux outrage: if the same post had been made first by any of the usual suspects you brown nose on here 24/7, you would have merrily joined in:

Jesus, who shat in your cornflakes?

Are you off out after this to tell some bairns that Santa isn't real?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A mere "tbf, publishing through Amazon doesn't necessarily mean that it would meet the regular standards which most publishers require" would have sufficed.

I see WTM's point but you can't just assume it's shite because of the route he's gone down. Even if it does happen to be shite, it still takes a lot of commitment to write the whole thing. I know fine well I'd have got to chapter 2 and just got fed up of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:

It doesn't take "determination" to get published this way. So long as it's not breaking any laws, Amazon will "publish" any old shite this way - the cut they get from any sales more than justifies the site space used & whatever print-on-demand copies are sold.

It's the old Citron Press scam on an industrial scale:-

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2000/aug/16/books.booksnews

Any one of you out there could get the free software and do this yourself with any old rubbish. Go on, try it. Amazon doesn't care so long as you follow their guidelines, the cut they take from the meagre sales made (& their size of operations) more than justifies any expense from the limited downloads or pay to print.

At least this one frees the authors from falling for the vanity press trap of paying for their own printing (in that respect for once good luck to Amazon). If it stopped Deadasdillinger from potentially being conned out of thousands of pounds, three cheers, but please don't be naive enough to think it's any big deal to get published in this manner.

But pity the poor authors when they start wondering when they're going to make any money from the fruits of their labours, & discover the hard way Amazon aren't doing it because they want to "revolutionise the printing industry". It's because if there's a sucker to rip off, they're happy to help them on their way.

For example: http://www.takepermission.com/hidden-fee-self-publishing-amazon/

But jealous of a vanity press ebook which - from what little the author has deemed fit to actually show - reads little better than if he'd cut and paste the routine nostalgia circle jerk threads which can be read on P&B daily & everywhere else on the net for free? Please, spare us all the display of faux outrage: if the same post had been made first by any of the usual suspects you brown nose on here 24/7, you would have merrily joined in:

See Spike and Chester? See Chester? That's you three - devoid of either original thoughts or a spine.

Hi mate,

Can you provide a link to the albums you've published, songs you've written, football teams you've played for & managed, books you've written, restaurants you've cooked for, cars you've built... and just about anything else you've ever held an opinion on but have never done yourself?

See where your Tu quoque fallacy takes you in turn? :smartass

Feeble even by your snot nosed standards Smurph - but that's what happens when you try playing to the crowd. Let it be a little lesson.

^^^^^ Bible John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which utter bellend calls it "cribby"?

I've got to agree with the Mr.£500.

It has always been cribby in Dundee, and WTM what is wrong with you?

The boy has written a book. Good or bad we can decide when we have read it but you are coming across as a book printing snob. For what reason? Give the guy a break, if it is brilliant then great and if not at least he has tried.

Don't get how you can get jealous of something like that.

Edited to correct the spelling of "can".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cribby sounds like the sort of thing that happens in public schools, and we all know what goes on there. A bit of a shit name by all accounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Hmmm, what shall we call this game?"

"Well, people's nicknames are often their name, or part of their name with the suffix 'y'"

"Yeah, why don't we use that basis for naming this game?"

"Well, the game is about throwing the ball with the intention of it rebounding off the corner of a kerb, why don't we call it kerby?"

"Nah, lets just go for 'cribby'"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Hmmm, what shall we call this game?"

"Well, people's nicknames are often their name, or part of their name with the suffix 'y'"

"Yeah, why don't we use that basis for naming this game?"

"Well, the game is about throwing the ball with the intention of it rebounding off the corner of a kerb, why don't we call it kerby?"

"Nah, lets just go for 'cribby'"

A kerb is a crib.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...