Tom McB Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 #jesuischarlie #jesuislesoleil 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waldo Ponce Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 @nomorepage3 on Twitter has thanked them for giving them publicity Which is a great response, having read through that timeline I'd say they are pretty classy and their argument about not wanting it in a newspaper that is accessible to all is somewhat understandable, although I guess it's whether or not you believe that to be the real reason they want it banned, not sure I buy it. Anyway I find it difficult to care either way and find those on either side who are passionate about this to be c***s in the main. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardinal Richelieu Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 http://wingsoverscotland.com/shooting-at-shadows/ Heh, good article, although not sure why they decided to name all the images "sunfatties". -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstaggies66 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 (edited) their argument about not wanting it in a newspaper that is accessible to all is somewhat understandable They're not even fully nude. You know there's, like, nudist families who raise their children completely nude at home and are completely nude around them growing up, right? Like, I would maybe understand that point if it's images of full intercourse or something, but Page 3 isn't even particularly sexualized at least today. It's literally just attractive girls standing with their breasts displayed. If we're going to "child-proof" newspapers, there's a shitload worse in there (particularly in written form, but also "expertly blurred" images of decapitated bodies and shit) that their innocent little eyes could be corrupted by. The only reason I remotely care is precedent (like I said I haven't looked at a newspaper for like 7 years, and there's countless nudist sites and/orporn to fill the void of whatever you seek in Page 3). It's just these hardline, oppressive elements of modern feminism sinking its claws further into society. And that's not a good thing at all. Did you know hardcore pornography is ILLEGAL in Iceland. You can literally go to prison for publishing adult pornography.. Like if these people were just happy to campaign and pressure for things to be removed I'd be fine, but they're the extremist sort who would see more laws made, people thrown in prison just to get them to live their lives they way they desire them to. It's frightening. Edited January 22, 2015 by ironstaggies66 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 #JeSuisCharlie21Manchester 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Mon the boobs! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 This has Inspired my new avatar 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForzaDundee Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Nicola Sturgeon though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I got a good upskirt photo of her at Caird Hall few weeks back..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I got a good upskirt photo of her at Caird Hall few weeks back..... Does she have a big cock? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Does she have a big cock? Just burst ooot laughing Couldn't see it for the humongous bush mate.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamdunk Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 I don't know, seeing as it was the times who reported it ending in the first place, it's a typically classless stunt by the sun considering the amount of people who are strongly against it. A big f**k you for having an opinion imo. Toying with people's emotions is a pretty shit thing to do, the sun are pretty good at it and have sunk even further in estimation. It's craigkillie/big Gus all over again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardinal Richelieu Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 I don't know, seeing as it was the times who reported it ending in the first place, it's a typically classless stunt by the sun considering the amount of people who are strongly against it. A big f**k you for having an opinion imo. Toying with people's emotions is a pretty shit thing to do, the sun are pretty good at it and have sunk even further in estimation. It's craigkillie/big Gus all over again. Not one for conspiracy theories, but given that the Sun and the Times are owned by the same guy, I smell shite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom McB Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 I don't know, seeing as it was the times who reported it ending in the first place, Really, proof of that? it's a typically classless stunt by the sun considering the amount of people who are strongly against it. A big f**k you for having an opinion imo. Please explain how this stopped people having an opinion. Toying with people's emotions is a pretty shit thing to do, That's what people said about the Charlie Hebdo cartoons. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamdunk Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Really, proof of that? Please explain how this stopped people having an opinion. That's what people said about the Charlie Hebdo cartoons. It's just what I heard, sorry don't have time to look into it just now. It didn't stop anyone having an opinion, I was more meaning the way they've dangled the prize in front of the campaigners and yanked it away is like a big F U to those with that opinion. Of course this may have just been a one off and they ditched it, time will tell. er....ok. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha78 Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 Anyone remember the blonde from dundee on page 3 she was fit 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 Please tell me you haven't found this forum and registered after typing "dundee page 3 girl" into google 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skerla Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 34 minutes ago, Alpha78 said: Anyone remember the blonde from dundee on page 3 she was fit Amazing first post. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 36 minutes ago, Alpha78 said: Anyone remember the blonde from dundee on page 3 she was fit It was me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 (edited) On 22/01/2015 at 23:28, Zen Archer Esq. said: Does she have a big cock? Two posts before yours, ForzaDundee posted photographic evidence of Sturgeon with a big cock. Edited November 19, 2019 by pozbaird 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.