Jump to content

The Famous Aberdeen - Season 2022/23


Guest

Recommended Posts

posh confirmed contact has been made but no fees agreed.

Dons probably chanced their hand to get them for zero or nominal fee.

I'd hazard a guess a high chance we dont follow it up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frank Grimes said:

Accies wanting £500,000 compensation for Ferguson :lol:

Absolute chancers 

No chance whatsoever.

Entitled to 50% of the amount of contract they offered him plus development costs of around £10k per year for each year he has been there maximum.

Not a cat in hells chance this equates to anything remotely close to £500k.

Hamilton showing their true colours here as they were happy enough to let Docherty join THEM for buttons up front and being drip fed in the coming years.

Edited by Sheep62
Link to comment
Share on other sites

£500k what a load of balls.

Dons offer so far is probably £40k or some such and Hamilton are trying to force the issue.

i'd be very shocked if final figure is above £120k or something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

£500k what a load of balls.
Dons offer so far is probably £40k or some such and Hamilton are trying to force the issue.
i'd be very shocked if final figure is above £120k or something

Paper reporting Aberdeen offered 100K. I reckon the final offer will be about 220K.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sheep62 said:

No chance whatsoever.

Entitled to 50% of the amount of contract they offered him plus development costs of around £10k per year for each year he has been there maximum.

Not a cat in hells chance this equates to anything remotely close to £500k.

Hamilton showing their true colours here as they were happy enough to let Docherty join THEM for buttons up front and being drip fed in the coming years.

The "half of the offer" and relationship between development contribution and compensation don't quite work like that.

to get a payment of either type the previous club has to have made a new contract offer on no worse terms than the expiring contract with other conditions around refusal etc . let's assume accies did that and the debate is about the size of any payment only.

The development contribution (dc from now) is payable so long as the conditions are met and according to a tarrif. the tarrif is, as you say, 10k for years age 16-23 but 5k from 12-16.

The clubs don't have to agree this, it is payable.

Compensation is a different thing and is to be agreed between the clubs. if they can't agree it goes to tribunal. 

The new club has to make offers and report these to the spfl.  If there is a dispute which goes to tribunal, then 50% of the highest of these offers needs to be paid on account of any decision.if accies offered him a 1m salary and we offer 100k compo, we only pay 50k up front.

The tribunal takes into account actual costs incurred, including overheads, as well ad factors like alternative offers, 1st team experince etc.

The dc is a backstop for the compensation.  The dc is reduced by any compensation.

so lets say the dc is 50k, if a tribunal finds accies spent nothing, had no offers and didn't even have him on the bench and awards 40k compensation, accies get 50k.

If they take into account nigerian prince costs and barcelona made a 50m offer in january, and award 500k, accies get 500k.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apoparently on Talksport that we're interested in Cauley Woodrow from Fulham. Bit more enthusiastic about that than the Peterborough two.

If we sign them fair enough, give them a chance like everyone else, but we need to be aiming higher than 'not good enough for League One'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he starts next season with a 3 game ban. bummer.

it wont be 3 on bounce due to europa and league cup tho so you could argue we would be rotating the team slightly at that point in any event

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he starts next season with a 3 game ban. bummer.
it wont be 3 on bounce due to europa and league cup tho so you could argue we would be rotating the team slightly at that point in any event


3 game ban for over celebrating? How do they justify that?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hilarious the Dons fans seething at the reports we've asked for 500k. Nevermind the fact it's probably not true as it was the the sun that reported it , but don't we have the right to try and get as much money as we can for one of our players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Laid-back Accie said:

Hilarious the Dons fans seething at the reports we've asked for 500k. Nevermind the fact it's probably not true as it was the the sun that reported it , but don't we have the right to try and get as much money as we can for one of our players.

To an extent, but a bit unfair to ask Aberdeen to pay for you guys getting fooled by a Bank scam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...