Poet of the Macabre Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 We've gave Clark no service on Saturday and he had little/no impact on the game. That's a shocker. He's proven over and over that if you give him decent openings in the penalty area, he'll find the back of the net. It's like when people got on Andy Kirk's back because he "didn't track back". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMessiah Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Dunfermline have a large number of absolute fucking zoomers in the support, Clark is a top quality striker, if you give him service, he'll giv you goals, if you don't, he won't. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Smith and Clark have had poor games but I've never seen McManus have a poor one yet. Even against Falkirk away out wide he was decent. Clark appears lazy compared to the hard working Smith and McManus but I think he's the best finisher at the club. It's a difficult situation but if McManus has been dropped then Clark definitely should be given a rest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMessiah Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 On 10/28/2017 at 17:13, Stoo61 said: Does Clark do enough to be playing 90 mins? This has to be the single most painfully cliched question for a great finisher. Yes is the simple answer, if he's not scoring it is because someone else isn't doing their job right. If he was missing loads of chances then fair enough, but he's not, because he's had no service. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsforlife Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Smith and Clark have had poor games but I've never seen McManus have a poor one yet. Even against Falkirk away out wide he was decent. He wasn't decent out wide, which is why he swapped with smith(who did a far better job of it) the following week at qots.We have quality up front regardless of which 2 are picked. It's not the area of the pitch we should be worried about, even if that means the 2 not playing are going to be frustrated.We all know what Clark is best at, unfortunately he's not getting the opportunity it at the moment. We can change him and get better hold up play or more pressure on defenders but ultimately that isn't going to bring goals to the side, only creating more chances will. Quite why as the leagues top scorers people are worried about our goalscoring i have no idea. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelheart Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Pars still doing braw, you guys would've been ecstatic being up there at start of season in a league where anyone can beat anyone so plenty encouragement for the guys that have got you up there in order not jeers me thinks 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoo61 Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 On 02/11/2017 at 11:50, TheMessiah said: This has to be the single most painfully cliched question for a great finisher. Yes is the simple answer, if he's not scoring it is because someone else isn't doing their job right. If he was missing loads of chances then fair enough, but he's not, because he's had no service. Lightweight, not particularly good on the ball, not quick. A head on legs in the 6 yard box. Prefer to see McManus start. Personally. SO PAINFUL. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parfecto Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 To describe Clark as lightweight and not good on the ball is just nonsense. As has been said by a few people talking sense, if there are absolutely zero chances being created then Clark isn’t going to score. Smith is doing well for a young lad and has lots of potential but I’d have much rather had Clark running through on goal one on one with the Inverness keeper last week.As has been pointed out, Clark is the new scapegoat. He was getting dogs abuse up at Inverness. He, by far, wasn’t the worst player on Saturday but he was the focal point for abuse. At Inverness I was stuck next to an absolute bell end dressed like Liam Gallagher who genuinely seemed like he doesn’t go to many games at all. If Clark didn’t control the ball on a sixpence every time it went near him he was foaming at the mouth. Apparently the team not trying hard enough either meant they were all homosexuals(or some word along those lines he used to describe them). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellaboz Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 Sounds like a total dickhead. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
planbiffy Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 On 26/10/2017 at 13:44, Adam101 said: Quite possibly but I don’t really see Ashcroft or Morris being moved on or getting much of a better deal else where so he’s unlikely to play much for us or would it be better for him to play league one or bottom end of championship next season than sit about out bench half the time he isn't even on the bench he's up in the stand with his hood up looking like something out of assassin's creed 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poet of the Macabre Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 On 11/4/2017 at 08:12, parfecto said: To describe Clark as lightweight and not good on the ball is just nonsense. As has been said by a few people talking sense, if there are absolutely zero chances being created then Clark isn’t going to score. Smith is doing well for a young lad and has lots of potential but I’d have much rather had Clark running through on goal one on one with the Inverness keeper last week. As has been pointed out, Clark is the new scapegoat. He was getting dogs abuse up at Inverness. He, by far, wasn’t the worst player on Saturday but he was the focal point for abuse. At Inverness I was stuck next to an absolute bell end dressed like Liam Gallagher who genuinely seemed like he doesn’t go to many games at all. If Clark didn’t control the ball on a sixpence every time it went near him he was foaming at the mouth. Apparently the team not trying hard enough either meant they were all homosexuals(or some word along those lines he used to describe them). The flogging of Clark was insane yesterday. Some were genuinely at risk of a heart attack they were getting so worked up about him. Pissed myself when they all thought he was getting subbed but he was just getting a drink. Anyone who ironically cheers a sub is a c**t. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parfecto Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 The flogging of Clark was insane yesterday. Some were genuinely at risk of a heart attack they were getting so worked up about him. Pissed myself when they all thought he was getting subbed but he was just getting a drink. Anyone who ironically cheers a sub is a c**t. Yeah saw that too. Ignore the other players who have been poor for weeks because Clark hasn’t scored lately. It’s all his fault because his dad’s the assistant manager. Doesn’t help that absolutely nothing is being created from midfield. Some of the supporters yesterday were complete simpletons. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsforlife Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 There was a guy behind me utterly seething that we weren't pushing for the winner. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 One game bans for Higgy and Declan? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsforlife Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Should be, think they'll be served vs Morton 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 6 hours ago, parsforlife said: Should be, think they'll be served vs Morton Does it have to be a league game? Can it not be in the cup? Genuinely unsure 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsforlife Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Does it have to be a league game? Can it not be in the cup? Genuinely unsure 99% sure any red cards for two yellows are served in the following game in the same competition.Think it's the same for straight reds if it's for denying a clear goalscoring opportunityFor violent conduct/serious foul play it's 1 game in the same competition and 1 game in the next game. Less sure about this one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salvo Montalbano Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Next league game fo'sho. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poet of the Macabre Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 If they're suspended for Morton and not Queen's Park then both should definitely start at Hampden. I'd partner Smith and Ryan in that game as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 12 hours ago, Salvo Montalbano said: Next league game fo'sho. Cool lingo m8 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.