Doink Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Mike Ashley 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doink Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Taggart 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Bennett 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Pedro 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Just now, Jim McLean's Ghost said: The side letters were dealt with by LNS. The details of EBTs haven't been changed by any court after the FTT. There is no reason to revisit that ruling. OK Jim, now we can now move onto the crux of the matter in question. The LNS at the time dealt with Rangers FC as if the EBT scheme was being properly implemented and was being legally used. This outcome has now made the LNS commission void by proving in a court of law that Rangers FC were in fact abusing the EBT scheme left, right & centre by paying players wages through an offshore method hiding it from the SFA and SPL in order to pay them more in wages. It really is that simple. The outcome has now proved Rangers FC to have improperly registered their players for over a decade by having dual contracts, one of which was hidden from the SFA which is against association rules. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Foliage 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Dignity 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue92 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Celtic win the treble.Craig Whyte found not guilty.Rangers knocked out of Europe.Rangers found guilty of institutional tax avoidance.All this in the space of 2 months! #sometekkersaregood For a minute there I thought this was meant to be a song and was about to call you a terrible lyricist. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, Henrik's tongue said: Good lad, now finish your vodka and go and shout at parked cars. 1 minute ago, Henrik's tongue said: 'Fishal cheats 10 minutes ago, Henrik's tongue said: Dross, fluffers etc. Bwahaha cheats. The wee fanny is absolutely desperate for attention! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 What? With this final ruling by the Supreme Court the question arises Should Rangers face further punishment from the football authorities? I am arguing no because this ruling has no material change in fact that were considered under the previous investigation by the SFA, the Lord Nimmo Smith Report. If there had been a change in circumstance like ruling the EBTs a tax evasion scheme then it would have been right to re-open possible sanctions by the SFA. Absurd.There has always been the ambiguity of where the BTC would or would not come down on HMRC or Rangers favour.This coloured everything and as I said before the enormously narrow parameters set by the SFA for LNS meant that this judgement would never be fair, transparent or sufficient.As we discovered later.As it happens, I have no interest in any re-opening of procedures against Rangers, they're gone mate. Who would be in 'court' as defendant's? I know that's not the right term.All that is required is for the SFA to take all the information and void any titles won by Rangers while the DOS and EBTs operated. That's it and it's what they should have done in the first place. No judges, no QCs just "did they register these players and their wages properly?"No? Then all these shiny baubles, pots and pans go into the sea. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doink Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 David Leggat 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: The wee fanny is absolutely desperate for attention! Dross, Fluffers, Chagrin. Bwahahaha cheats and shite at fitba. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny van Axeldongen Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 St.Mirren fan Chick Young 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Just now, The_Kincardine said: Both the sentiment and grammar of the average moon-howler. Today's outcome changes nothing. When all else fails you, head straight for the grammar and shpelling errurs ffs. Today's outcome changes everything you dopey c**t. Legally your club have been officially labelled fucking cheats mate. The SFA will now be under pressure to do the right thing and resit the SPL commission with the new evidence from the SUPREME COURT that you and yer two clubs are rancid smelly drunken cheats, smell the glove pal, it's coming. Might not get the title stripping but we sure as hell won't let the likes of you fucking forget it ya smelly cheating c**t. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 (edited) Moon howlers, chagrin, dross, thickets, tropes. cheats Edited July 5, 2017 by Henrik's tongue 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mart1 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 For a minute there I thought this was meant to be a song and was about to call you a terrible lyricist. [emoji106] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: My wee fanny is absolutely desperate for attention! We know. How does it feel to be legally labelled a fucking cheat? Oh ma sides. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 6 minutes ago, hellbhoy said: OK Jim, now we can now move onto the crux of the matter in question. The LNS at the time dealt with Rangers FC as if the EBT scheme was being properly implemented and was being legally used. This outcome has now made the LNS commission void by proving in a court of law that Rangers FC were in fact abusing the EBT scheme left, right & centre by paying players wages through an offshore method hiding it from the SFA and SPL in order to pay them more in wages. It really is that simple. The outcome has now proved Rangers FC to have improperly registered their players for over a decade by having dual contracts, one of which was hidden from the SFA which is against association rules. And if you had bothered to read the Supreme Court ruling you would see that the fact EBTs are legal hasn't changed. All HMRC has done is convince the court that the establishment of an Employee Benefit Trust does not provide the employee with tax relief and should have had PAYE applied as normal income. There was no abuse of EBTs. It is stated at least twice in the judgement that EBTs were not a sham. So with those facts unchanged there is no reason to re-open the issues decided by LNS. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Leg humping my posts, chagrin, green and grey dross, pundy, boab, wee fanny Bwahahaha cheats 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Imagine having to cheat to win the Scottish league 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.